With barbs and bluster, Trump barges into 2016 White House race

[cadaverdog]

That guy doesn't like Trump because he hasn't mastered the art of the combover as well as Trump has.

[PETE'S BROTHER]

Am I the only one with an average intelligence around here?

I'm a dumbass.

dummy

[FORD]

Well... since Mike Malloy was dragged into this thread, for whatever reason, might as well get his input on the topic....

[FORD]

Or last week. That's what I'm saying. FROD picks on the EASY targets & STILL he has to make shit up.

What's the deal with that?

Cheers!

What did I make up? Did I take Doc Brown's DeLorean back to 1927 and plant a story in the New York Times??

[DONNIEP]

What did I make up? Did I take Doc Brown's DeLorean back to 1927 and plant a story in the New York Times??

If it was even remotely possible - you would.

[Little Texan]

What did I make up? Did I take Doc Brown's DeLorean back to 1927 and plant a story in the New York Times??

Uh, this part right here...

Named alongside Trump are John E Kapp and John Marcy (charged with felonious assault in the attack on Patrolman William O'Neill and Sgt. William Lockyear), Fred Lyons, Thomas Caroll, Thomas Erwin, and Harry J Free. They were arraigned in Jamaica, N.Y. All seven were represented by the same lawyers, according to the article.

Point out the portion of this newspaper article where it says this. I've gone back over it a few times and I can't find it anywhere. Either I'm blind or you're seeing stuff that isn't there. Believe it or not, we are capable of reading here.

[FORD]

If it was even remotely possible - you would.

If I took a time machine back to the 1920s, I'd be too busy tracking down the BCE before they could fund Hitler (and cause the Great Depression) to worry about anything else)

[FORD]

Uh, this part right here...

Named alongside Trump are John E Kapp and John Marcy (charged with felonious assault in the attack on Patrolman William O'Neill and Sgt. William Lockyear), Fred Lyons, Thomas Caroll, Thomas Erwin, and Harry J Free. They were arraigned in Jamaica, N.Y. All seven were represented by the same lawyers, according to the article.

Point out the portion of this newspaper article where it says this. I've gone back over it a few times and I can't find it anywhere. Either I'm blind or you're seeing stuff that isn't there. Believe it or not, we are capable of reading here.

Apparently you need new glasses then. The highlighted portion at the bottom of the second column refers to the arraignment and the fact that all 7 of these KKK fucksticks were represented by the same lawyers. The third column says what the charges were, and mentions the name of those arrested, and what the charges were. Daddy Trump was "discharged" but he was still very much a participant in the Klan rally, including wearing a sheet. Since there were 1,000 cross burning Klan fucksticks present, but only 7 of them arrested, this was not a case of mass arrest just because cops didn't like the Klan. So the logical conclusion is that Daddy Trump, along with the 6 others arrested must have been involved in the assault on the officers, though they could only make the charges stick against two of the cross burning Klan fucksticks.

[PETE'S BROTHER]

So the logical conclusion is that Daddy Trump, along with the 6 others arrested must have been involved in the assault on the officers, though they could only make the charges stick against two of the cross burning Klan fucksticks.

a conclusion you made....up? :P

[cadaverdog]

a conclusion you made....up? :P

He didn't make that up. The guy that brainwashed him did. He's no longer capable of forming independant thoughts. Isn't it obvious?

[cadaverdog]

Daddy Trump was "discharged" but he was still very much a participant in the Klan rally, including wearing a sheet. Since there were 1,000 cross burning Klan fucksticks present, but only 7 of them arrested, this was not a case of mass arrest just because cops didn't like the Klan. So the logical conclusion is that Daddy Trump, along with the 6 others arrested must have been involved in the assault on the officers, though they could only make the charges stick against two of the cross burning Klan fucksticks.

The logical conclusion I got from reading that is you're full of shit. I think most of the rest of the people telling you you're full of shit feel the same way.

[cadaverdog]

If I took a time machine back to the 1920s, I'd be too busy tracking down the BCE before they could fund Hitler (and cause the Great Depression) to worry about anything else)

And I bet you've got the same amount of proof of this you have of Fred Trump being a member of the KKK. None.

[Seshmeister]

You have to admit that if Papa Trump was just an innocent bystander caught up by accident in the incident it would be a strange decision for him to use the Klan lawyer to plead his case.

It's still just a little bit of trivia, what about the stories of Donald having racist policies towards casino staff in the 80s. Or harrassing people out of their apartments in the 1970s/80s using people with mob connections. Or constantly using campaign contributions to buy favors with politicians to then get big state subsidies on his buildings and on and on it goes.

[Little Texan]

Apparently you need new glasses then. The highlighted portion at the bottom of the second column refers to the arraignment and the fact that all 7 of these KKK fucksticks were represented by the same lawyers. The third column says what the charges were, and mentions the name of those arrested, and what the charges were. Daddy Trump was "discharged" but he was still very much a participant in the Klan rally, including wearing a sheet. Since there were 1,000 cross burning Klan fucksticks present, but only 7 of them arrested, this was not a case of mass arrest just because cops didn't like the Klan. So the logical conclusion is that Daddy Trump, along with the 6 others arrested must have been involved in the assault on the officers, though they could only make the charges stick against two of the cross burning Klan fucksticks.

I don't need glasses. Tell us where in the article it says this:

Named alongside Trump are John E Kapp and John Marcy (charged with felonious assault in the attack on Patrolman William O'Neill and Sgt. William Lockyear), Fred Lyons, Thomas Caroll, Thomas Erwin, and Harry J Free. They were arraigned in Jamaica, N.Y. All seven were represented by the same lawyers, according to the article.

Sure you can make the assumption that if he was discharged he must have been arrested, but it's just that, an assumption. I don't see anywhere in the article where it says in print that he was arrested. Assumptions and speculation are not the same thing as facts. Before you say I'm some Trump fan, I think the guy is a full of hot air idiot that's in love with himself. I've never seen him as a serious candidate and I'm certain he'll fade from the Rep field soon enough.

[cadaverdog]

You have to admit that if Papa Trump was just an innocent bystander caught up by accident in the incident it would be a strange decision for him to use the Klan lawyer to plead his case.

Maybe the lawyer offered him his services at a reduced rate since he was already defending the other six people. The real point is this. It only mentions that Fred Trump was discharged which makes it logical he was arrested but it doesn't say why he was arrested or why he was discharged which I assume means he wasn't being prosecuted. Nowhere does it say Fred Trump was a member of the klan, wearing a robe, burning crosses or fighting with the police.