You'll never guess who the Stalin-funded treasonous Kochs are endorsing for President

[Kristy]

Doesn't mean they are "funding" her you pseudo-leftist asshole. Hilary has been a Koch-sucker all along. Now more than ever. Why? Because of her preparation to shift sharply to the right for the god damn November general election which she will win. All master Bernie is doing is sticking his withered cock up her ass because he can and he's a bitter Jew who hates to lose. Even the Democratic Party is warning master Bernie to knock this shit off by dick-pegging Clinton’s Wall Street ties and telling him to get the fuck out. For fuck's sake, even Harry Reid is fed-the-fuck-up with master Bernie's “negative campaign,” while Big Dick with a Bigger Dick Durbin the No. 2 Senate Democrat, called on master Bernie to help “unify our party and stand behind Hillary Clinton.” And the Koch Brothers is suddenly "news" to you?

[Satan]

No, the Koch Brothers OPENLY ADMITTING they support that rancid cunt is "news" to me.

It wasn't that long ago that they tried to hide their funding of the Clinton founded fake "democrats" in the DLC behind the false name "the Georgia Pacific Foundation" (even though it's not exactly a state secret that Koch Industries is the parent company of Georgia Pacific)

[Kristy]

No, the Koch Brothers OPENLY ADMITTING they support that rancid cunt is "news" to me.

It wasn't that long ago that they tried to hide their funding of the Clinton founded fake "democrats" in the DLC behind the false name "the Georgia Pacific Foundation" (even though it's not exactly a state secret that Koch Industries is the parent company of Georgia Pacific)

Seriously, what in the fuck is wrong with you? The Kochs are a small minority in Hilary's little war plans. Here's read this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/magazine/how-hillary-clinton-became-a-hawk.html?_r=0

Oh right, fuck me with an already fucked Jesus popsicle stick you can't read because it's not written by some old white guy so allow moi to lay out the premise for you.

Mark Landler did not wrote an expose, but a sympathetic account of Clinton’s war credentials from a newspaper that has endorsed her and done everything it its power to ensure her with a proper ass fucking to the Oval Office effective January 2017. Now I know it's a bit of a lengthy article for your pseudo-leftist autistic mind to comprehend so the piece stoking the widespread anti-war sentiment in that state and negatively impacting Clinton’s vote. The Times piece states Clinton as the consistent war hawk within the Obama administration (which she was) often butt fucking Obamie because her Steve Tyler Season Of Withered pussy didn't get wet enough with killing innocent with numerous drone strikes. Anyhoo, it f goes on to say how Hillary “backed General Stanley McChrystal’s recommendation to send 40,000 more troops to Afghanistan [in 2009] before endorsing a fallback proposal of 30,000”; she “supported the Pentagon’s plan to leave behind a residual force of 10,000 to 20,000 American troops in Iraq”; and she “pressed for the United States to funnel arms to the rebels in Syria’s civil war.”

God damn. And you're only concern is Kochs giving her some sort of an endorsement?

Hillary will lay waste to America more than any Teddy Boy Cruz's masturbatory military fantasy ever could. Oh, but what do the Kochs think. That's all of what is important to you and your pseudo-left wool-pulling angry white guys. Clinton, says Landler) has worked for fucking decades to develop close relationships with the military. She has also been seeking out ties with “not just civilian leaders like Gates, but also its high-ranking commanders, the men with medals.”

But fuck that. It's what the Koch Brothers say.