Donald Trump makes 'extreme right' Stephen Bannon his chief strategist

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nickdfresh
    replied
    Or how many opiods and how much scotch does Rick Perry indulge in?

    Leave a comment:


  • FORD
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Nitro Express
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Nitro Express
    replied


    Apparently Putin is the man if you are a dictator who needs to get out of Dodge.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nitro Express
    replied
    As far as Russia goes we can keep them in line with economic warfare. They are a oil economy. Their eggs are in one basket. We can keep them pinned that way but again, China is more of a greater potential future problem than Russia is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nitro Express
    replied
    Originally posted by cadaverdog
    The communistic party (in Russia) ceased to exist when the USSR dissolved into 15 post Soviet states on the December 25th 1991. Russia became a Constitutional Republic after that. They still lean towards socialism but then again so does your hero, Bernie Sanders.
    No there is still a communist party in Russia. Actually they are Putin's main political competition. I found Moscow to be quite capitalistic. It's kind of like New York City now where there are shops open at 2:00AM. You probably have more freedom in Putin's Russia than you do in Singapore actually. Singapore is actually a dictatorship with lots of rules and regulations and you can get in big trouble if you violate them. Since China is flexing it's muscle and has a lot of attitude I think geopolitically you are going to see the US side with Russia as a hedge against China. Basically do what Nixon did with China against the Soviet Union but in reverse this time. Then of course it was the oligarchs like Bush who sold us out to China and built them up. So all this get's complicated and if you are looking for cut and clear good guys and bad guys you are going to have a hard time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nitro Express
    replied
    Originally posted by FORD
    Just hearing now that the Cheeto faced nazi dipshit has appointed some climate change denying oil company shit for brains as the head of the EPA???

    Apparently the words "Environmental" and "Protection" mean something else in Oompa Loompa land
    If Cheeto is a Nazi he certainly isn't going to get along with Putin. Putin kind of had some family members wiped out by the Nazis and they sort of made his home town of Leningrad a living hell during the war. As far as the EPA pick goes, could it be possible Tricky Dick Nixon (the father of the EPA) is rolling in his grave?

    Leave a comment:


  • FORD
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • FORD
    replied
    Cheeto nominates his BANKRUPTCY LAWYER as Ambassador to Israel

    .....and of course, he's an extremist Likud wackjob

    Trump Chooses Hard-Liner as Ambassador to Israel

    Matthew Rosenberg
    NY Times
    12/15/16

    WASHINGTON — President-elect Donald J. Trump on Thursday named David M. Friedman, a bankruptcy lawyer aligned with the Israeli far right, as his nominee for ambassador to Israel, elevating a campaign adviser who has questioned the need for a two-state solution and has likened left-leaning Jews in America to the Jews who aided the Nazis in the Holocaust.

    Mr. Friedman, whose outspoken views stand in stark contrast to decades of American policy toward Israel, did not wait long on Thursday to signal his intention to upend the American approach. In a statement from the Trump transition team announcing his nomination, he said he looked forward to doing the job “from the U.S. embassy in Israel’s eternal capital, Jerusalem.”

    Through decades of Republican and Democratic administrations, the embassy has been in Tel Aviv, as the State Department insists that the status of Jerusalem — which both Israel and the Palestinians see as their rightful capital — can be determined only through negotiations as part of an overall peace deal.

    Mr. Friedman, who has no diplomatic experience, has said that he does not believe it would be illegal for Israel to annex the occupied West Bank and he supports building new settlements there, which Washington has long condemned as illegitimate and an obstacle to peace.

    The Trump transition team’s statement focused on Mr. Friedman’s long history with Israel, portraying him as a friendly supporter of the country whose views were in line with the United States’ position toward it.

    “The two nations have enjoyed a special relationship based on mutual respect and a dedication to freedom and democracy,” it said. “With Mr. Friedman’s nomination, President-elect Trump expressed his commitment to further enhancing the U.S.-Israel relationship and ensuring there will be extraordinary strategic, technological, military and intelligence cooperation between the two countries.” The statement said that Mr. Friedman was a fluent speaker of Hebrew and “a lifelong student of Israel’s history.”

    Mr. Friedman’s appointment was quickly praised by the Republican Jewish Coalition, whose executive director, Matt Brooks, called it “a powerful signal to the Jewish community.”

    But beyond Republicans, there were deep concerns over the choice of Mr. Friedman. J Street, a dovish lobbying organization that has been critical of some Israeli policies, said in a statement that it was “vehemently opposed to the nomination.”

    “As someone who has been a leading American friend of the settlement movement, who lacks any diplomatic or policy credentials,” it said, “Friedman should be beyond the pale.”

    Mr. Friedman has made clear his disdain for those American Jews — especially those connected to J Street — who support a two-state solution for the Israelis and the Palestinians. Writing in June on the website of Arutz Sheva, an Israeli media organization, Mr. Friedman compared J Street supporters to “kapos,” the Jews who cooperated with the Nazis during the Holocaust.

    “The kapos faced extraordinary cruelty,” he wrote. “But J Street? They are just smug advocates of Israel’s destruction delivered from the comfort of their secure American sofas — it’s hard to imagine anyone worse.”

    At a private session this month at the Saban Forum, an annual gathering of Israeli and American foreign policy figures, Mr. Friedman declined to disavow the comments and even intensified the sentiment.

    Questioned by Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor in chief of the Atlantic, Mr. Friedman was asked if he would meet with various groups, including J Street. Mr. Friedman said he would probably meet with individuals but not with the group, according to several people who attended.

    Mr. Goldberg then raised the kapos comparison and asked if he stood by it. Mr. Friedman did not back away. “They’re not Jewish, and they’re not pro-Israel,” he said, according to the people in the room.

    Daniel Levy, a left-leaning former Israeli peace negotiator, said that in naming an ambassador with the hard-line views of Mr. Friedman, Mr. Trump could end up undercutting the security of Israel and the United States and condemn “the Palestinians to further disenfranchisement and dispossession.”

    “If an American ambassador stakes out positions that further embolden an already triumphalist settler elite, then that is likely to cause headaches for American national security interests across the region and even for Israel’s own security establishment,” Mr. Levy said. “Especially an ambassador committed to the ill-advised relocation of the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.”

    In its statement, the Trump team noted that Mr. Friedman had held his bar mitzvah 45 years ago in Jerusalem at the Western Wall. The wall, the holiest place where Jews can pray, is a remnant of the retaining wall that surrounded the ancient Temple Mount, the most sacred site in Judaism.

    The site today houses the Al Aqsa Mosque compound, the third holiest site in Islam. Control over the site has been a persistent source of friction between Israel and the Palestinians, and has sparked violence between the two sides.

    More recently, the Western Wall itself has been a source of tension and clashes between the Orthodox authorities who control the site and more liberal Jews, many of whom are from North America and oppose the restrictions there on prayer by women.

    Leave a comment:


  • FORD
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • cadaverdog
    replied
    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    Why do I get the impression c-dog has no idea who we're talking about? :D
    We? You haven't posted anything about who "we" are talking about. This is your first post since the person "we" started talking about (Alexander Hamilton) become part of the conversation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nickdfresh
    replied
    Why do I get the impression c-dog has no idea who we're talking about? :D

    Leave a comment:


  • cadaverdog
    replied
    Originally posted by Seshmeister
    I hear he was actually a bit of a cunt in real life.
    Of course he was. He thought his opinion meant more than the average citizen's opinion. I cut and copied this from an earlier post you made: Hamilton and the other founders did not trust the population to make the right choice.
    If that's true why bother having elections at all? Hamilton was a shit talker. He talked so much shit somebody finally got their fill of it and shot the sumbitch.

    Leave a comment:


  • vandeleur
    replied
    Originally posted by Seshmeister
    I hear he was actually a bit of a cunt in real life.
    To much is made of this real life

    Leave a comment:


  • Seshmeister
    replied
    Originally posted by vandeleur
    That Hamilton sure could sing
    I hear he was actually a bit of a cunt in real life.

    Leave a comment:

Working...