Part of my thinking is along the lines of Trump should have the same access to as wide a variety people with experience in government as any other president would.
As to Huntsman working for Trump now when [Huntsman] was seen as too conventional a candidate himself in 2012, I can't recall Huntsman saying anything specifically about Trump one way or the other in the 2016 campaign. I mean, he may well have, but I haven't even so much as seen Huntsman on tv since 2012. So, for me Huntsman working/shilling for Trump doesn't have QUITE the same hypocritical ring that it does for someone like Romney or Cruz.
I mean, who cares who the official US Ambassador to Russia is, anyway? It's not as if Trump has a lack of available means to contact Putin and his cronies outside of the normal State Department channels.
As to Huntsman working for Trump now when [Huntsman] was seen as too conventional a candidate himself in 2012, I can't recall Huntsman saying anything specifically about Trump one way or the other in the 2016 campaign. I mean, he may well have, but I haven't even so much as seen Huntsman on tv since 2012. So, for me Huntsman working/shilling for Trump doesn't have QUITE the same hypocritical ring that it does for someone like Romney or Cruz.
I mean, who cares who the official US Ambassador to Russia is, anyway? It's not as if Trump has a lack of available means to contact Putin and his cronies outside of the normal State Department channels.
Comment