Hypocrite Kerry 'Couldn't Think' for 40 Minutes on 9/11

[lucky wilbury]

Originally posted by FORD
It wasn't Haig's position to be in control of shit. By your own admission, with Reagan shot and Poppy conveniently in Texas establishing his alibi, the guy in charge should have been Tip O Neill, the Speaker of the House.

but still you know you be right there saying you were in charge just to see if anyone would listen. i think tip was technacally in charge there for a little bit when they couldn't find bush

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by John Ashcroft
Face it, Kerry's a panty-waste.

He's not going to win because he's a damn waffler and hypocrite. Not to mention he's condescending and arrogant. There's about oh, 25% of the hard-left that will vote for anyone but Bush, but that certainly leaves a whole bunch of voters to make up. And Kerry's not capable of doing it.

No one who doesn't hate Bush is excited for Kerry, period.

I don't know who's doing your polling for you Johnnie, but I'd fire their ass if I were you.

"He's not gong to win because he's a damn waffler"?

Are you kidding me?

Take that quote with you to the voting booth come November for me, will ya?

You have a "war president", who 4 months before the election is neck and neck with the challenger, facing an economy that is less than expected / promised, who is surrounded by scandal, leaks, infighting, and a far right "base" that frankly isnt that thrilled with him.

Please, by all means, take your "he wont win waffler" stance and stand pat. You have nothing to worry about. It's a lock.

How's the view with your head that far up your ass?

This race is far from won by you guys Johnnie. But I like it when you get over confident.

Re-Defeat Bush

[Ally_Kat]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Leave it to a neo con dolt to post "panty-waste"

iT'S PANTY WAIST

As in the ENTIRE Dubya administration is full of draft dodging panty waists

A Panty -waste, is when YOU throw away YOUR underwear due to skid marks from improper wiping.

no, no. A panty waste is what the kiddies around here say when we refer to someone being a waste of what their father put in their mom's panties. Panty Waste. Very common in the colleges where I go to.


I love how Kerry demands Bush to show all his record, yet won't release the papers on why he got his purple hearts.

Has he released them? the medi tended to drop that one but hounded Bush's

[BigBadBrian]

Originally posted by distortion9
I thought he was behind 9/11?....The obvious next question would be, why does he need missles to protect himself?

Touche'

[Viking]

Oh, The Souffle thinks quite a bit. Unfortunately, it's always about how he can advance his career. And if it means shooting a wounded 12-year-old Vietnamese kid in a loincloth in the back to do it, then so be it, in his world.

Talk all the shit you want about Bush - Kerry is an elitest, cowardly, aggrandizing, psychotic menace to everything this country ever stood for. This fucker almost (almost) makes me wish Klinton was back in office. At least we knew what sort of deluded, amoral, tax-jacking buffoon we were dealing with, and could head him off. Kerry will get us killed.

[Big Train]

Posted by Ford:

Notice I said potentially. Just as he made potential targets out of his own family at Citibank last weekend. Which means **IF** Al Qaeda is a real orginization of terrorists who are NOT on the BCE/CIA payroll, then the kids in Florida were targets, as were Pickles and the twins last week. And one who knowingly subjects women and children to risk of violence can not be described as an effective leader.

On the other hand, if Al Qaeda is either a figment of Bush's imagination OR on the the BCE payroll, then that makes Bush a lying, manipulating, murderous bastard. And that can also not be described as an effective leader. Or at least not the kind I want in this country.

I feel like both of those paragraphs represent the yin and yang of your paranoia..

[ELVIS]

That's what I was saying...

[diamondD]

At least he's starting to bring some doubt into his own theories for a change instead of blustering how the fringe are the only people that know the truth about everything.

[knuckleboner]

Originally posted by John Ashcroft
Leadership, or natural leaders don't need to be in positions of power to illustrate their abilities in this area.

For instance, Junior enlisted show leadership qualities all of the time, and they have essentially no authority.

I'm talking about the quality of leadership, not how you act in a position of power when situations dictate leadership. Kerry showed nothing that would validate his criticism of the President. And remember, the criticism came from Kerry (via that bloated idiot Michael Moore). This was not a response to anything the President said about Kerry's behavior on 9/11.

So, essentially what I'm saying is that if you're gonna throw down, be able to back it up with examples of your own behavior.

And saying "I would've done X, Y, and of course Z" doesn't count.

i hear you. but kerry, in particular SHOULDN'T have shown leadership qualities on 9/11. it would've only hurt. now, somebody wants to say that in OTHER areas, kerry has never shown leadership, so he shouldn't criticize bush on his own, fine. but this particular article says that since kerry didn't show leadership on 9/11 (when he SHOULDN'T have) that he can't criticize bush on 9/11. poor argument. that's all i'm saying.

[John Ashcroft]

I still think you're missing my point KB...

So let me ask, did Massachussets as a state (under authority of it's two Senators) show anything remotely unique even after 9/11?

I'm not saying that John Kerry should've donned a flight suit and taken off in an F-16 moments after the first jet hit. What I'm saying is that his anecdote on what "he'd have done on 9/11" falls on deaf ears. He's supplied absolutely no evidence or support of his leadership abilities for anyone to take him seriously. If he had a record of stepping up to the plate in difficult situations, then at least the public could say "well, maybe he'd have handled it better". But he offers none. And those who've been analyzing his past as a leader realize that he's so full of shit it hurts! He isn't a leader, period. He's pretty much voted lock step with the "Senior Senator from Massachussets" since he's been a Senator. He's a Ted Kennedy sheep. Period.

So, he's asking the American public to believe that he'd have responded better on 9/11. But what has he shown that would make anyone believe him? Not just on 9/11, but througout his entire public life? OK, so he led a bunch of Vietnam protestors to Washington. So it this is what he's basing his leadership qualities on, why not say so? He could simply say, "I wasn't President on 9/11, but I'd have handled it much like I've handle the organization of protestors during Vietnam." "I'd have a "smarter" plan, where our allies (Germany and France) wouldn't have been isolated from our coalition. I'd have rallied them much like I rallied all those hippies back in the '60's and '70's" to protest Vietnam!"

At least there'd been something to base his "leadership" qualities on...

[Igosplut]

JA, that reminds me of the slogan from years ago...

Teddy Kennedy can do for Massachusetts what he did for Mary Jo.....

Anybody own a gun??? You wont if Kerry gets in.....

[FORD]

Originally posted by Igosplut


Anybody own a gun??? You wont if Kerry gets in.....

Bullshit. The NRA, KKK, and CIA spin that tired lie against every Democratic candidate. NONE of them, not even Kucinich or Nader, ever called for taking away anybody's guns.

Bottom line. criminals and psychotics have no business owning guns, so gun shows and any other seller that doesn't do background checks needs to be put out of business for good. I also don't see why anybody needs an assault rifle. Other than those common sense laws, I see nothing wrong with law abiding sane adults owning a reasonable number of firearms.

And that's MY position, not that of the Democratic party or Kerry. But I doubt theirs is that much different.

BTW, you really think the BCE WON'T confiscate your guns?? They're following the Hitler playbook pretty well so far.......

[BigBadBrian]

Originally posted by FORD
Bullshit. The NRA, KKK, and CIA spin that tired lie against every Democratic candidate. NONE of them, not even Kucinich or Nader, ever called for taking away anybody's guns.

Bottom line. criminals and psychotics have no business owning guns, so gun shows and any other seller that doesn't do background checks needs to be put out of business for good. I also don't see why anybody needs an assault rifle. Other than those common sense laws, I see nothing wrong with law abiding sane adults owning a reasonable number of firearms.

In California, guns can be confiscated merely by how they LOOK, not by how they operate. Yes, they can be confiscated if they fit a certain description, even if they are single shot.

[FORD]

Then talk to Herr Gropenator about it. Not the Democrats

[BigBadBrian]

Originally posted by FORD
Then talk to Herr Gropenator about it. Not the Democrats

I don't believe he was the Governor that passed those bills or signed them into law.