Tweet
Originally posted by Thorman
That's almost funny...not quite though...!! You need to get ed u ma cated bit time dude.....VH has sold well to the masses post 1986 not the other way around...Sure the band was successful prior to 1984 but not the way they were after 1986...The music post 1986 sucks? Dude, same writer, same guitar player..same good tunes (though the synths suck)..Your just all chocked up cause u hate Sammy...get over it dude, roth sucks by himself and is nothing without the brothers...talk radio?? please!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's almost funny...not quite though...!! You need to get ed u ma cated bit time dude.....VH has sold well to the masses post 1986 not the other way around...Sure the band was successful prior to 1984 but not the way they were after 1986...The music post 1986 sucks? Dude, same writer, same guitar player..same good tunes (though the synths suck)..Your just all chocked up cause u hate Sammy...get over it dude, roth sucks by himself and is nothing without the brothers...talk radio?? please!!!!!!!!!!!!
2. Roth's solo material is often times more Van Halen than Van Halen. Nothing sucks about that.
3. Hagar sucks by himself. Roth has talk radio, yeah. And an EMT career. No profit in that for him. Sam? Maybe you'll buy his tickets, his T Shirts, his videos, his watered down tequila, his BBQ sauce, and all the other bullshit he throws at people these days, but he's STILL not putting asses in the seats or selling records. So you tell me who's doing better - and who's got the more in the way of personal integrity.
Hagar is a whore who will do anything for cash and ride anybody's coattails to whatever realms of success he thinks it'll take him - evidenced by his going back to Van Halen last summer in the first place.
Roth is a class act, cradle to the grave.
And there's the truth.
Comment