Now, there have been a number of different versions of Dave, but who is better?
In no particular order, except chronological, we have Dave. He was a young, inexperienced yet vibrant frontman in the late seventies/early eighties. We also have Dave, the experienced rock frontman of the late 80's. Then, there is Dave, a solo artist that does rock music, as well as Dave, who does pop music. Then, we have Dave, he had vocal problems, yet was still better than Hagar. Then, we had Dave, the man who was on 2 compilations in 2 years, Mr. Nostalgia. Then, Dave, a man who released fast-moving hard rock albums. Today, there is Dave, he is getting back to his roots.
Personally, I prefer Dave to Dave, although Dave was good. However, even he wasn't as good as Dave. And Dave, he's good as well.
What do you think?
In no particular order, except chronological, we have Dave. He was a young, inexperienced yet vibrant frontman in the late seventies/early eighties. We also have Dave, the experienced rock frontman of the late 80's. Then, there is Dave, a solo artist that does rock music, as well as Dave, who does pop music. Then, we have Dave, he had vocal problems, yet was still better than Hagar. Then, we had Dave, the man who was on 2 compilations in 2 years, Mr. Nostalgia. Then, Dave, a man who released fast-moving hard rock albums. Today, there is Dave, he is getting back to his roots.
Personally, I prefer Dave to Dave, although Dave was good. However, even he wasn't as good as Dave. And Dave, he's good as well.
What do you think?











Comment