Should DLR even be mentioned in the same sentence as Sammy

[Golden AWe]

welcome to the dump, mein freund

[RogueHorseman]

Originally posted by EbDawson
"That statement is not only illogical but also unworthy of refutation."

Isn't THAT the truth, and nothing but.

OT: Thought of you last week my old friend when I first heard the news... Although, we should all be so lucky to live to be 99.

[EbDawson]

Originally posted by RogueHorseman


OT: Thought of you last week my old friend when I first heard the news... Although, we should all be so lucky to live to be 99.

Thanks for the thought amigo.

RIP Eddie.

[rockvanhalen66]

Re: Should DLR even be mentioned in the same sentence as Sammy

Originally posted by dysfunction
Honestly, Sammy resurrected Van Halen when they were a tribute band. He took them from the bottom to the biggest band since Zeppelin. Now there is no doubt in anyone's mind that Van Hagar deserves to be mention in the same league as Zeppelin. But does Roth really deserve to be mentioned in the same league as Hagar. I believe that is what has tarnished the Van Halen legacy, even more than VHIII. The fact the people keep talking about Roth pisses people off and therefore Sammy has to deal with being the second best frontman next to Plant, because of Dave's unwilliingness to let it go and realize Sammy is the fucking man. Everytime Van hagar does something great (5150, OU812, F.U.C.K., Balance, Learning to See, Up For Breakfast) someone brings up Roth and tarnishes Hagar's legacy because Roth and his fans still think although he never was that great.

sam did his job but i would say things could be ass kicking if they could get dave back. seen the two front men both of them have something going. but dave put the big show on when with vh... hall of fame let sam do a set and dave close .....