Originally posted by Calderone
No,this tatoo was made post 2002
CFTH is 1997
here its a 1999 video and no tatoo
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oQViCrM-nBs"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oQViCrM-nBs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
No,this tatoo was made post 2002
CFTH is 1997
here its a 1999 video and no tatoo
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oQViCrM-nBs"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oQViCrM-nBs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
lol, you may be rite .
Well crap, I am mentaly divergent.lol
I could swear I saw a hint of some tats on his back in 2001/live, then, I
thought, I had seen reff to these in the book.Like I knew that!!! why should it surprise me.
Plus when I look at these they look old.They do fade fast.
I truly do wish I had a better recall, but such is life. I am usually rite but I always loose the bet on time placement/ timing.
But if I spend days researching every answer. I wouldn't post in a relevant time anyway ,so be it.
Since he has shown them some interviewer will ask and Dave may let us know the stories behind them.
Then I will be able to tie it all together.
I am still going to say they were placed before 2000.
Would Dave wear body make-up to hide them ?
I always thought that was why he wore a shirt?
I thought they were done in the eighties.?
Like most things if you don't hear it from the person being discussed it is probaly BS.
My Bad.
We will see .
Roth on.
Comment