Tweet
I have been waiting -Several Months- now ,for one of the wordsmiths around here, (University or at least High School graduated ).
To -Confligrate- the -Comparisons- to this -Sceensceen- time related discussion.
I never post in -The Main- cause ,most of what popps thru my Brain is BS.
OK ...
In the year 1984 Van Halen had a certain look and sound it was as it had allways been, Dave, Ed, Alex, Mike,and the extras that make things happen.
There were -Fans- galore and much smiling of the masses.
Then Dave left or was asked to fukk off, who really knows.
The band was split up.People were unhappy because -Things- were not as they should be.... or as -Normal- as to not disturb the wants of so many.
Dave went on to his Gig and VH had Spamuel Gror Raybar as a New Singer.
There was a big split in the fan base also.
Some said,( read this sentence well),"Fukk it, it is still Van Halen ."
That is when the big discussion began -Who is Vah Halen-," is it still a vialble VH."
With Sam.
Then Spam was out and Dave was back. (fukk all the in-between).
Is this Incanation of VH the exact same thing to so many.As the 84 split was to -ALL-
CVH is still locked in 1984 but they have a new bassplayer.
It's like the last twenty years never happend....or did it...?
Dave never left what happend was a new bassplayer was hired this is what we have now.
Would the -FAN SPLIT-(a world wide talking point of historically recorded magnitude) have been as """"Important to Music History""" as the loss of, THE FRONT MAN.
There are Haggis fans who say this is not VH because of thier Want of how it should be.
There are CVH fans who say this is not VH without MA.
Is this the healing of the original wound or is this just another Dave fronted band.?
What I am unable to relate to you is -This Wound- that was created in the fan base in 84 in anyway over?
It will never be CVH in CBGb's in 77 or Max's KC or at the US Fest.
We had (2) TWO camps in 85 do we still have 2 camps or -Are- thier a even more diverse complication of VH fans now.?
CVH ...........VHagar..........VanCherone.......VHWOLF Mode....?
Is -This Incarnation- of the band that Roth Fronted in 84 in anyway even close to what we wanted back.?
Is the SPLIT in the fans here at this board even half as Rabbid as the
Split of 84........?
Is this -ENOUGH CVH- to be called Classic Vah Halen is BACK?
This thread is not about Van Halen it's about the people who went off with Van Hagar and just brushed Roth fronted VH off.
Are the fans who say Roth was VH Happy without Mike?
If Mike was replaced in 84 and Roth -NEVER LEFT VH- would there have ever been -The Great Van Halen Controversy-.
One of the most important Musical talking points in the history of music.
Or would the ones of us who went- Violently with PASION- with Roth have simply said what most CVH fans said, Vah halen with Sam is still VH.
Are WE the ones who say Dave is back and without Mike is still VH.
Are we those guys who stayed with VH and Sam exactly the same as them .
If we are all for this -Band-are we 2007 version of the Fukk Dave crowd of 1984?
To -Confligrate- the -Comparisons- to this -Sceensceen- time related discussion.
I never post in -The Main- cause ,most of what popps thru my Brain is BS.
OK ...
In the year 1984 Van Halen had a certain look and sound it was as it had allways been, Dave, Ed, Alex, Mike,and the extras that make things happen.
There were -Fans- galore and much smiling of the masses.
Then Dave left or was asked to fukk off, who really knows.
The band was split up.People were unhappy because -Things- were not as they should be.... or as -Normal- as to not disturb the wants of so many.
Dave went on to his Gig and VH had Spamuel Gror Raybar as a New Singer.
There was a big split in the fan base also.
Some said,( read this sentence well),"Fukk it, it is still Van Halen ."
That is when the big discussion began -Who is Vah Halen-," is it still a vialble VH."
With Sam.
Then Spam was out and Dave was back. (fukk all the in-between).
Is this Incanation of VH the exact same thing to so many.As the 84 split was to -ALL-
CVH is still locked in 1984 but they have a new bassplayer.
It's like the last twenty years never happend....or did it...?
Dave never left what happend was a new bassplayer was hired this is what we have now.
Would the -FAN SPLIT-(a world wide talking point of historically recorded magnitude) have been as """"Important to Music History""" as the loss of, THE FRONT MAN.
There are Haggis fans who say this is not VH because of thier Want of how it should be.
There are CVH fans who say this is not VH without MA.
Is this the healing of the original wound or is this just another Dave fronted band.?
What I am unable to relate to you is -This Wound- that was created in the fan base in 84 in anyway over?
It will never be CVH in CBGb's in 77 or Max's KC or at the US Fest.
We had (2) TWO camps in 85 do we still have 2 camps or -Are- thier a even more diverse complication of VH fans now.?
CVH ...........VHagar..........VanCherone.......VHWOLF Mode....?
Is -This Incarnation- of the band that Roth Fronted in 84 in anyway even close to what we wanted back.?
Is the SPLIT in the fans here at this board even half as Rabbid as the
Split of 84........?
Is this -ENOUGH CVH- to be called Classic Vah Halen is BACK?
This thread is not about Van Halen it's about the people who went off with Van Hagar and just brushed Roth fronted VH off.
Are the fans who say Roth was VH Happy without Mike?
If Mike was replaced in 84 and Roth -NEVER LEFT VH- would there have ever been -The Great Van Halen Controversy-.
One of the most important Musical talking points in the history of music.
Or would the ones of us who went- Violently with PASION- with Roth have simply said what most CVH fans said, Vah halen with Sam is still VH.
Are WE the ones who say Dave is back and without Mike is still VH.
Are we those guys who stayed with VH and Sam exactly the same as them .
If we are all for this -Band-are we 2007 version of the Fukk Dave crowd of 1984?
Comment