Dave and John 5 recording

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vaijuju
    Sniper
    • Jan 2008
    • 830

    #16
    Originally posted by chefcraig
    I wouldn't hold that against MOJODOJO, as he's been around for nearly a decade over there and isn't given to posting nonsense. He is a working musician and generally comes off as an honest, decent guy.

    Now, how he happened to interpret the remarks made by Lowery are another thing, as is how much truth was behind Lowery's comments in the first place. It wouldn't be the first time that a musician (John 5) has exaggerated the truth in order to put himself into a better light.
    right! and John 5 has an album coming soon
    The official John 5 website
    http://vhfrance.activebb.net/ (1 er Site Francophone sur Van Halen)

    http://www.youtube.com/user/VHFranceVideos (Our new Channel)

    Comment

    • UK ROCKER
      Banned
      • Oct 2009
      • 259

      #17
      Originally posted by Vinnie Velvet
      Yeah its a rumour and something posted by a linker as well.

      But it is interesting.

      There are a few of scenarios that can result from this:

      1) --as someone already stated--Dave could be recording demos with John 5 for a new VH album. Unlikely though because he's never done that before (with VH anyway).

      2) He is actually recording new material with John 5 for a new DLR solo album --- but will still tour with VH.

      3) He is just recording a few songs as a guest on John 5's own solo record.

      I would say number 2 is a possibility but 3 seems more likely.

      Dave, as we know, is not one to just sit around and do nothing (which Ed likes to do these days) -- so he needs an outlet.
      Can't see Dave doing any of the above ,not this far in the game.

      VH product or nothing at this stage,

      Dave won't fuck that up for anything.

      Although Ed may well use this as an excuse so he dosen't have to come up with new product, It was all Dave's fault ec etc....

      Comment

      • hambon4lif
        Crazy Ass Mofo
        • Jun 2004
        • 2810

        #18
        Originally posted by VAiN
        Maybe Dave is doing a guest spot on an upcoming John5 album?
        That's a possibilty. There is a John 5 disc coming out, and Billy Sheehan also has a guest spot on it.

        .....I bet that's one motherfukker of a disc.

        Comment

        • hambon4lif
          Crazy Ass Mofo
          • Jun 2004
          • 2810

          #19
          Originally posted by DaveTheScott
          We all know how much of a fan the Sisters are of bandmates working on outside projects...stand the fuck by...

          On the other hand, is it really an issue?

          It just seems so pissy-assed and petty at this point in the game that they would throw a tantrum about a bandmate doing a 'guest spot' on someone elses album.
          It would also show that they didn't learn their lesson the first time around.

          So Dave is doing the howls in some flick or kicking in on somebody elses disc....Big Fuckin' Deal! He can't just sit and do nothing while waiting for his bassplayer to get through puberty.

          Comment

          • standin
            Veteran
            • Apr 2009
            • 2274

            #20
            You know, for ya'll to be all sexually wild and everything
            It sure is up tight about doing what you want, when you want, and how you want around here. And it is not even about sexy time~ go figure.
            I'll take Afghanistan for the win, Dave.
            To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
            MICHAEL G. MULLEN

            Comment

            • chefcraig
              DIAMOND STATUS
              • Apr 2004
              • 12172

              #21
              Eh?









              “The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”
              ― Stephen Hawking

              Comment

              • kwame k
                TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                • Feb 2008
                • 11302

                #22
                Originally posted by chefcraig
                Eh?
                Exactly.........
                Originally posted by vandeleur
                E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place :D

                Comment

                • Anonymous
                  Banned
                  • May 2004
                  • 12749

                  #23
                  Originally posted by standin
                  You know, for ya'll to be all sexually wild and everything
                  It sure is up tight about doing what you want, when you want, and how you want around here. And it is not even about sexy time~ go figure.
                  I'll take Afghanistan for the win, Dave.
                  If I ask you nicely, will you post your boobies?

                  Then maybe it's sexy time?

                  Cheers! :bottle:

                  Comment

                  • hankster
                    Roadie
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 164

                    #24
                    I think that Dave isn't dumb enough to be doing something that would piss off the VH contingent, besides if he is then there goes the forthcoming VH album
                    The Hankster Cometh

                    Comment

                    • kwame k
                      TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 11302

                      #25
                      Didn't Eddie go on a rant about how it's not worth recording anything, anyways because his fans would; A) Just steal it and not buy it, and B) since we didn't love the awesome new tunes he did with Spammy on the '04 abortion tour.......we are not worthy of hearing anymore of his genius.

                      I can't blame Dave if he did record a new solo record and just do the oldies set with VH. At least that way he is giving the fans what they want.....new music.
                      Originally posted by vandeleur
                      E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place :D

                      Comment

                      • UK ROCKER
                        Banned
                        • Oct 2009
                        • 259

                        #26
                        Originally posted by kwame k

                        I can't blame Dave if he did record a new solo record and just do the oldies set with VH. At least that way he is giving the fans what they want.....new music.

                        That would be great if that happened, but Dave would have to give interviews to promote his album, but all the press would ask about is VH, And the gag order may still be in place so that would put Dave in a tricky position.

                        I still thnk he will hold out for a VH album, knowing that it may shift a lot of copies.

                        Fingers crossed.

                        Comment

                        • kwame k
                          TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 11302

                          #27
                          Originally posted by UK ROCKER
                          That would be great if that happened, but Dave would have to give interviews to promote his album, but all the press would ask about is VH, And the gag order may still be in place so that would put Dave in a tricky position.

                          I still thnk he will hold out for a VH album, knowing that it may shift a lot of copies.

                          Fingers crossed.
                          Yeah, that's a great point.....from everything I have read about the last recording with Spammy, it was a nightmare even getting those lame ass songs together.

                          Can Eddie work with a producer and Dave in a creative environment? He seems pretty bitter that the VH fans blew off VHIII and the BS spammy '04 songs. Maybe he's lost his confidence in himself, maybe he's just a bitter little kunt, but that Guitar Player interview really puts the KO on new music. Kinda hard to misunderstand what he says in that interview.......but with everything in VH land, what is said today is contradicted tomorrow.

                          I hear ya, fingers are crossed here, too.
                          Originally posted by vandeleur
                          E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place :D

                          Comment

                          • heartbreaker
                            Groupie
                            • Feb 2004
                            • 52

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Vinnie Velvet
                            ......and he also said that Dave is still with VH.

                            http://www.vhlinks.com/vbforums/john...ng-t49400.html
                            I believe this IS all true, but the big question is... which year of NAMM are we talking about? I could see this being relevent for 1998, 2001, 2009, etc.

                            Comment

                            • kwame k
                              TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                              • Feb 2008
                              • 11302

                              #29
                              Well since the post in question was from 1/18/2010. I'd have to say this weekends NAMM.
                              Originally posted by vandeleur
                              E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place :D

                              Comment

                              • standin
                                Veteran
                                • Apr 2009
                                • 2274

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Imapus_Sylicker
                                If I ask you nicely, will you post your boobies?

                                Then maybe it's sexy time?

                                Cheers! :bottle:


                                Church Redbrook's photo

                                <object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/G0XVX_wUGKU&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x006699&color2=0 x54abd6&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/G0XVX_wUGKU&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x006699&color2=0 x54abd6&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="340" height="285"></embed></object>
                                To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
                                MICHAEL G. MULLEN

                                Comment

                                Working...