Guess the name of the new LP?

[Mr Walker]

Poopy

[chefcraig]

I pasted the "source" where I read the info. The link is the source. The guy who posted this didn't post a link to any other article. Take it for what it's worth.

That's not the point. With all of the misinformation that is coming down the pike (tour dates, youtube links with Nuno guitar riffs used to fake people into believing it's new VH, album titles, the new single, ect.) it's hard enough to keep a handle on what's real and what's outright bullshit. If you notice, the fellow wrote "Saw this on-line. WTF?" but couldn't be bothered to name any source for it. Simply posting a link to where you happened to read it doesn't clear things up or even give it one bit validity.

I mean come on...people are getting pissed over show dates that have not been verified, complaining about album cover art when the damned album hasn't even been issued and even whining that the first single MIGHT be called "Tattoo." Rather than a bunch of speculation (which just may have been pulled straight out of somebody's ass) what we need are concrete facts. Naturally, the Van Halen PR machine happens to move at a glacier's pace, but soon enough we'll have the truth.

[Va Beach VH Fan]

We're just going to have to start deleting posts CC, we're not going turn this place into one big rumor mill.....

If they list a source, it can stay....

[Sensible Shoes]

I'm not pissed, I'm worried and bored. THe worst combination I suppose. Trying to participate and not really having anything constructive to add.

[chefcraig]

We're just going to have to start deleting posts CC, we're not going turn this place into one big rumor mill.....

If they list a source, it can stay....

I despise having to delete anything, unless it's by the poster's request. But to tell ya the truth, I really don't see any other way around it without someone else having to scour the internet to verify some random tidbit (that may or may not be factual) because another poster felt like mentioning it.

[FORD]

Whatever happened to verification anyway? I mean it might be difficult to find "three independent sources" anymore, but at least ONE reliable source shouldn't be too much to ask.

And no, "some guy at VH Links" or "That douchebag radio station in Ontario that started the Coverdale rumor" doesn't count as a reliable source.

[chefcraig]

Yeah, it's the basic "TMZ/All News, All The Time - Just Not Necessarily Accurate" way of dispersing information in a hurry these days. Why bother with facts at all when you can get people's attention (and charge more to advertise) without them?

[kwame k]

I despise having to delete anything, unless it's by the poster's request. But to tell ya the truth, I really don't see any other way around it without someone else having to scour the internet to verify some random tidbit (that may or may not be factual) because another poster felt like mentioning it.

[Jagermeister]

We're just going to have to start deleting posts CC, we're not going turn this place into one big rumor mill.....

If they list a source, it can stay....

If WE of all people can't disect fact from fiction then we are fucked IMO. I have been doing it for years from FORD and jhale. I am an expert at it.

[kwame k]

[Roth & Roll]

Here's a suggestion:

[smorgdonkey]

WARF is rounding into mid-season form....

100% agreement!!

[bantonelli]

Bette's weeping

[binnie]

I just hope that Pitbull doesn't 'feature' on this record....

[SNIPER]

"Better Late Than Never"