If they do bring Mike back for some type of 40th year deal, my hope would be that Dave would understand the moment and step up his game accordingly, like he did in 2007. It's been mentioned before, but I think 75-80% of Dave's vocal issues are the same bad choices being made over and over again. The remaining percentage is due to the ravages of time, although all the smoking Dave has done certainly hasn't helped. If he prepared like he did in '07 and simply SANG THE SONGS AS THEY WERE WRITTEN, I think he'd be fine.
As for Samburglar pushing the co-lead singer deal, I'm not sure what to make of it. Is it as simple as he thinks it would be a cool thing to do? Does he think that's the only way he could be part of VH again? Would he still consider the dual lead singer thing if one of the conditions was Mike not being involved? I don't know. What I do know is that I personally have zero interest in a dual lead singer arrangement. Hell, I'm doubtful that even the current iteration of VH will be doing anything next year.
We'll see, but we all know the deal with these guys- don't believe anything about a new album until you're actually listening to it and don't believe anything about another tour until the band is literally standing onstage in front of you.
As for Samburglar pushing the co-lead singer deal, I'm not sure what to make of it. Is it as simple as he thinks it would be a cool thing to do? Does he think that's the only way he could be part of VH again? Would he still consider the dual lead singer thing if one of the conditions was Mike not being involved? I don't know. What I do know is that I personally have zero interest in a dual lead singer arrangement. Hell, I'm doubtful that even the current iteration of VH will be doing anything next year.
We'll see, but we all know the deal with these guys- don't believe anything about a new album until you're actually listening to it and don't believe anything about another tour until the band is literally standing onstage in front of you.
Comment