Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition & 'Inside

[Satan]

Originally posted by Warham
Oh, please!

Everybody knows Satan was behind the attacks...

A ridiculous accusation....

While I certainly am an expert when it comes to fire and destruction, there's just one serious flaw in your theory.

I hate skyscrapers! I can't stand being that high off the ground.

Because it makes me homesick......

[Guitar Shark]

Hey Satan, quit holding back on us! Next time Dave goes running with you, let us know.

[Keeyth]

Originally posted by FORD

So if the majority of the jet fuel had burned within that short of a time span, how exactly would there be a means of keeping the steel frame hot enough to soften and twist over an hour later when the towers "collapsed"?

And if the majority of the jet fuel never went into the second tower at all, how is it even possible that its frame would melt first?

It simply does not add up.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by FORD

This is what I have been saying since 9/11. There is no way those two planes could have brought those buildings down.

Think about this: One of the pilots was so confident the buildings would come down, that he chose to hit the building only 25 floors from the top, even though he had a relatively clear shot at hitting the building almost down to the waterline.

Ownership of the WTC changed hands 11 weeks before the attacks, and that's how they were able to put the charges in place necessary to bring the buildings down.

Another telling point is the Israeli company that had offices on the lower floors of the WTC BROKE THEIR LEASE and moved out of the WTC 3 weeks before the attacks, after Israel repeatedly warned the US about the impending attacks.

The whole thing stinks. Bush knew he needed a Pearl Harbor in order for him to gain America's support to go over and finish Daddy's war, and he gave it to us. Worse yet, America fell for it.

[Nickdfresh]

Those "pilots" never thought they were going to bring the whole building down.

Bin LADEN indicated afterward that they only calculated collapsing the top floors, not the entire building.

[Nickdfresh]

:D

[Keeyth]

Bin Laden never indicated anything. Or do you speak Saudi now? I don't buy that crappy back room tape for starters. We are being sold another diversion by Bush in that one.

However, you are right, NO ONE thought those buildings would come down, because those buildings were built specifically to withstand a plane hitting them. After that plane hit the Empire state building way back when, that was a priority when building the tallest (at the time) buildings in the world in '73. In a high wind, those buildings swayed less than three feet at the very top. A bomb went off in the basement in '93 and did NOTHING. You are gullible if you believe the bill of goods Bush sold you on 9-11. period.

[scamper]

I read that the government planted an infestation of super termites into the jets that were flown into the buildings. After the explosion these little creatures (who thrive on thousand degree temperatures) multiplied and ate their way through the steel beams, bringing down the towers. It was on the internet so it must be true.

[Sammy Hata]

All it took for the twin towers to collapse is the steels integrety to be compromised on 1 floor. When this happened, the weight of all the other floors above caused a major domino effect. Since all of the floors were designed almost exactly the same from the 2nd floor to the 110th this is why the buildings collapsed quickly and neatly and straight down.

[Sammy Hata]

Originally posted by Keeyth
Bin Laden never indicated anything. Or do you speak Saudi now? I don't buy that crappy back room tape for starters. We are being sold another diversion by Bush in that one.

However, you are right, NO ONE thought those buildings would come down, because those buildings were built specifically to withstand a plane hitting them. After that plane hit the Empire state building way back when, that was a priority when building the tallest (at the time) buildings in the world in '73. In a high wind, those buildings swayed less than three feet at the very top. A bomb went off in the basement in '93 and did NOTHING. You are gullible if you believe the bill of goods Bush sold you on 9-11. period.

Actually, the bomb desrtroyed 3 stories in the parking structure located in the basement of that building.It killed 6 and injured over 1,000 people with a bad fire.It didn't bring the building down, but it was far from nothing.

http://wwwrobinsdrumworks.com

[Keeyth]

Originally posted by Sammy Hata
Actually, the bomb desrtroyed 3 stories in the parking structure located in the basement of that building.It killed 6 and injured over 1,000 people with a bad fire.It didn't bring the building down, but it was far from nothing.


http://wwwrobinsdrumworks.com

Good point. It TOOK OUT THREE FLOORS and the building didn't come down. Even though it had the wieght of ALL of the rest of the tower on it, Three floors blown out did not make it fall!! Are you hearing yourself make my point for me?? There is NO WAY HAVING A COUPLE OF FLOORS THAT HIGH UP BLOWN OUT WOULD HAVE MADE THE BUILDINGS COLLAPSE.

[Keeyth]

Originally posted by Sammy Hata
All it took for the twin towers to collapse is the steels integrety to be compromised on 1 floor. When this happened, the weight of all the other floors above caused a major domino effect. Since all of the floors were designed almost exactly the same from the 2nd floor to the 110th this is why the buildings collapsed quickly and neatly and straight down.

Dude, those "other floors" had been holding up the weight of the building for over thirty years. Get a clue, buy a vowel, do something, but stop trying to sell that crap.

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by Keeyth
Bin Laden never indicated anything. Or do you speak Saudi now? I don't buy that crappy back room tape for starters. We are being sold another diversion by Bush in that one.

However, you are right, NO ONE thought those buildings would come down, because those buildings were built specifically to withstand a plane hitting them. After that plane hit the Empire state building way back when, that was a priority when building the tallest (at the time) buildings in the world in '73. In a high wind, those buildings swayed less than three feet at the very top. A bomb went off in the basement in '93 and did NOTHING. You are gullible if you believe the bill of goods Bush sold you on 9-11. period.

Wrong, there was a tape made a few months after the attacks purportedly of BIN LADEN speaking to a SAUDI asshole cleric about how the attacks surpassed every expectation.

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by Keeyth
Dude, those "other floors" had been holding up the weight of the building for over thirty years. Get a clue, buy a vowel, do something, but stop trying to sell that crap.

And if you bothered to have read the pbs.org (hardly a BUSH/FOX source), you'd of noticed that the fire caused the steel to buckle as it lost 80% of it's strength at about 1500 degrees F. This then caused a "pancake effect."

[Guitar Shark]

Not to mention the fact that the first collapse occurred at about 2/3rds of the way up the building -- Keeyth are you suggesting that the floor immediately below the collapse should have been able to support the weight of 1/3 of the building falling onto it? Absurd.

Stop trying to paint us as gullible sheep for believing what science has proven, just because you are looking for some government conspiracy that doesn't exist. I hate Bush too, but I'm still able to maintain a grasp of reality.

[Nickdfresh]

The truth is, I can in fact be sold that THERE WAS A GOV'T CONSPIRACY, either to allow terrorists 9/11 plans to proceed or to cover up what amounted to blatant institutional incompetence, but don't tell me all these attacks were staged! Too many people would have talked by now! Ever hear of DEEP THROAT?