Truman dropped A-Bomb to iintimidate Soviet Union, not end WWII..

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hardrock69
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Feb 2005
    • 21897

    #16
    Yes, it is really a trip how real history ends up being homogenized into some kind of fucked up fairy tale.....

    Comment

    • academic punk
      Full Member Status

      • Dec 2004
      • 4437

      #17
      Originally posted by Hardrock69
      Yes, it is really a trip how real history ends up being homogenized into some kind of fucked up fairy tale.....
      I guarantee our children or our children's children will be attending "Dick Cheney Elementary School" someday.

      Comment

      • steve
        Sniper
        • Feb 2004
        • 841

        #18
        Originally posted by academic punk
        The Civil War was not really about freeing slaves.

        Just like W. uses "We did this to free the oppressed good people of Iraq!" to justify this war, Lincoln was able to use "Free the slaves" as his rallying cry.

        The reason Lincoln opposed slavery was b/c it made it difficult for lower class whites to land work. After all, employers would have to pay them far more than he'd have to pay a slave...and the slave he owns for life.
        ap...I respect most of your posts on here, but this is a blanket statement. The issue of slavery was something wrestled with since the conception of the US. The whole "3/5's" a person was in there because the issue of SLAVERY was BITTERLY contested by many at the Philadelphia conventions.

        While there is some argument to be made that the US civil war was about things other than slavery, there is overwhelming evidence that it was. And I think that goes for Lincoln as well.

        This isn't to say that northerners LOVED black people at the time or anything (or even that Lincoln did), but to say that the civil war , for lincoln, was n't about slavery is too cynical.

        It was.
        Last edited by steve; 07-22-2005, 10:19 AM.

        Comment

        • Nickdfresh
          SUPER MODERATOR

          • Oct 2004
          • 49567

          #19
          The very issue of States Rights vs. Federalism would never have come to the forefront if it were not for slavery.

          Comment

          • steve
            Sniper
            • Feb 2004
            • 841

            #20
            To say that it was merely a rallying cry ignores the political risk he took (to a great degree) in rallying behind the abolitionist movement (PRIOR to the civil war).

            My opinion .

            Comment

            • steve
              Sniper
              • Feb 2004
              • 841

              #21
              Originally posted by Nickdfresh
              The very issue of States Rights vs. Federalism would never have come to the forefront if it were not for slavery.
              Agreed.
              just ask Strom Thurmond

              Comment

              • FORD
                ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                • Jan 2004
                • 59643

                #22
                Originally posted by academic punk
                I guarantee our children or our children's children will be attending "Dick Cheney Elementary School" someday.
                There's already a "Todd Beamer" elementary school somewhere in Seattle, and we don't even know if that guy even actually existed.

                There's also a "George W. Bush" elementary in Tumwater. It's NOT named after Junior, but future generations will probably think so
                Eat Us And Smile

                Cenk For America 2024!!

                Justice Democrats


                "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                Comment

                Working...