Michael Moore Owns Haliburton Stock

[ELVIS]

Originally posted by Keeyth
Has to be. Maybe even an alias?

Newer posters haven't the slightest inclination of how sharp we can be around here...

They should at least attempt to alter their posting style when playing the alias game...

Punks...

I read somewhere the other day, millermoos claimed to be a female...

Whatever...

[Keeyth]

Originally posted by Warham
When somebody cuts and pastes here, we'd like a link. It's an unwritten rule, fool.

Not necessary when it's just a partial, fool, especially if he is saying it as part of his own arguement.

[ELVIS]

Originally posted by FORD
progressive causes

Define that for me...

Name a progressive cause or two...

[Keeyth]

Originally posted by ELVIS
Newer posters haven't the slightest inclination of how sharp we can be around here...

They should at least attempt to alter their posting style when playing the alias game...

Punks...

I read somewhere the other day, millermoos claimed to be a female...

Whatever...

I saw that too.

[Warham]

Originally posted by Keeyth
Not necessary when it's just a partial, fool, especially if he is saying it as part of his own arguement.

That wasn't a partial. That was at least a page he posted. It's necessary.

[Keeyth]

A link is only necessary if you are trying to prove something is a real article or not. He was trying to make the point of the factual written text of the constitution, which can be verified anywhere.

[Warham]

Originally posted by Keeyth
A link is only necessary if you are trying to prove something is a real article or not. He was trying to make the point of the factual written text of the constitution, which can be verified anywhere.

I want to see if HIS sources are real.

[Keeyth]

It was a valid point he made, and you can't argue with it, so you're changing the subject as usual. Geez... ...so transparent.

[FORD]

Originally posted by thome


I can guarantee you the money men in power positions in the
Mid East are controlling this insurgency for their benefit and
that Koran and religiose Jihad and hatred of America is just a Front.

Has this occurred to anyone else

Actually, it has. And you may very well have the right idea. But the wrong suspects.

Islamic radicals from other countries can't possibly benefit from having US troops in Iraq, therefore there is no incentive for them to fuel an insurgency.

However, Mossad and the Likud Zionist-fascists benefit greatly from someone else's army fighting their wars for them.

[DrMaddVibe]

Originally posted by FORD
If he's keeping the money, perhaps.

But if he's donating it to progressive causes (which would really piss off the war profiteers) then he's using an evil entity to do good.

It's my understanding that the stock is owned by a foundation, which by very definition means the money is probably passing through to charities.

Schweizer found that "for a man who by 2002 had a net worth in eight figures, he gave away a modest $36,000 through the foundation, much of it to his friends in the film business or tony cultural organizations that later provided him with venues to promote his books and film."

And you could've read this before back on Page 1!!!!!

[FORD]

BTW, I would just like to remind the Busheep again that nobody other than World Nutcase Daily and NewsHax have heard of this fucking story, so as far as I'm concerned, it's fictional until proven otherwise.

Believe me, the corporate media would be like sharks in the water if they had anything verifiable against Michael Moore.

So far, it's just the Moonie media.........

[diamondD]

Bullshit. it's all over the place. Google it and try again.

[Big Train]

Spinning plates, spinning plates.

Let's recap:

Explanation 1. He is doing research...

Explanation 2. The story isn't legit....

Whats #3 going to be, that maybe Cheney "Planted" some BCE stock in his accounts?

[Cathedral]

Originally posted by Hardrock69
And Thome, I have never said that Saddamit was a kind and decent human being.

Ever.

Taking him out was a good thing, yes.

But despite his cruelty, he had not attacked us, he had not invaded (again) another country, and there were a lot of fabrications made by Chimp & Co. to justify our current situation.

I do not criticize our soldiers.

I only criticize the reasons why they are there.

Technically speaking, Saddam was in violation of the cease fire agreement between Iraq and the US established in Gulf War I and was in black market business designed to by-pass UN Resolutions with some of our so called Allie's.
These little forgotten facts are a big deal to me, and the message of defiance Saddam put forth had to be dealt with as an example to the rest of the world.
But I as any other sensible human expected a plan to take down Baghdad, restore peace and order, then rebuild.

It seems the planning stopped just after taking down Baghdad was agreed upon because it has been a clusterfuck of the unexpected since day one after the fall.

In my opinion Bush didn't need to lie about anything because Saddam had used the weapons we accused him of having on his own people and his neighbors. It was never a question of "did" he have them, we all know he did at one time.
The problem is that the weapons we knew of most likely expired and were not replaced, then Saddam had to put up a front in order to make the world, especially his local neighboring enemies, believe he was still a viable threat.

I'm torn between two realities here,
I firmly believe we did the right thing by ending the rule of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
But on the other hand, I don't like the apparent fabrication used to bolster the case to invade the country, it wasn't necessary in my view because Saddam was already in violation of the cease fire agreement and two UN Resolutions.

[FORD]

Originally posted by diamondD
Bullshit. it's all over the place. Google it and try again.

Just because every right wing blogger in the trailer park has picked up the rumor doesn't make it any more legitimate.