BYU physics professor says WTC was a controlled demolition

[Guitar Shark]

I would love to hear how "BCE" operatives managed to load up the WTC towers with explosives sufficient to bring them down, completely undetected.

We've all seen what's required to achieve a controlled demolition. It takes weeks, if not months, of careful planning and installation of equipment. Wires everywhere. Prep work. Yet somehow, the "BCE" managed to do all of this in secret, and the thousands of tenants and visitors to the WTC never noticed.

That BCE is truly amazing!

[ELVIS]

Not to mention, when a building is demolished it is literally taken apart at the seams prior to being demolished...

Get the fuck out of here with that BULLSHIT!

[Keeyth]

Originally posted by Warham
Then why run two planes into the Towers if they weren't necessary to bring them down? Why even mess with Step A, when you could've went right to Step B, which is to push the plunger down.

I smell BS, like usual when I read these hock conspiracy theories.

I can't even believe you asked that. It's so obvious. He needed the dramatics of the planes to provide the cover (he can't just blow up buildings without the cause of the explosions being investigated)
He also needed to have the supposed reason to attack the middle east.

How could you ask such a stupid question?

[Keeyth]

Originally posted by Guitar Shark
I would love to hear how "BCE" operatives managed to load up the WTC towers with explosives sufficient to bring them down, completely undetected.

We've all seen what's required to achieve a controlled demolition. It takes weeks, if not months, of careful planning and installation of equipment. Wires everywhere. Prep work. Yet somehow, the "BCE" managed to do all of this in secret, and the thousands of tenants and visitors to the WTC never noticed.

That BCE is truly amazing!

Ownership of the WTC changed hands 11 weeks before the attacks.

[Warham]

Originally posted by Keeyth
I can't even believe you asked that. It's so obvious. He needed the dramatics of the planes to provide the cover (he can't just blow up buildings without the cause of the explosions being investigated)
He also needed to have the supposed reason to attack the middle east.

How could you ask such a stupid question?

I would think the Twin Towers going down ANY way would be dramatic enough. That still doesn't answer my question, Keeyth. Why have nineteen Islamic terrorists hijack two planes, possibly getting caught in the process, just to put on a good show?

[FORD]

It is an established fact that Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy, both of whom have ties to Mossad, acquired the lease to the WTC a few months before the attacks.

It is also a fact that Marvin Bush (Chimpy's brother and card carrying member of the BCE) was the CEO of the company providing security for the WTC during this time.

Maintenance crews installed a "new sprinkler system" in the WTC in the weeks before the attacks. It's entirely plausible that explosive charges could have been placed in the building at this time, using the sprinkler system as a cover.

Silverstein admitted in a television interview that he gave the order to "pull" WTC Building 7. "Pull" means controlled demolition. Yet the power was cut to the entire WTC complex after the second plane hit the towers. Therefore there would have been no lights in building 7 allowing demolition crews to wire the building on that day. So the only possible answer is that the building was already set up for a controlled demolition. And if this is true of Building 7, then it could just as easily be true of Buildings 1 & 2 (the towers). Some have theorized that the buildings were ALWAYS wired for a controlled demolition, in the event that something could impact the towers and cause them to topple over onto Manhattan, rather than collapse onto themselves, as was done on 9/11/01.

[Keeyth]

Originally posted by ELVIS
Not to mention, when a building is demolished it is literally taken apart at the seams prior to being demolished...

Get the fuck out of here with that BULLSHIT!

To save the salvageable items maybe, but if you don't do that, it's not going to stop the explosives from taking the building down just as effectively.

Wake up and smell the BULLSHIT you've been fed by the BCE all this time.

[ELVIS]

Oh brother...

[Keeyth]

Originally posted by Warham
I would think the Twin Towers going down ANY way would be dramatic enough. That still doesn't answer my question, Keeyth. Why have nineteen Islamic terrorists hijack two planes, possibly getting caught in the process, just to put on a good show?

Funny how NONE of the names of the nineteen hijackers appeared on the manifests of either airline, and then THE VERY NEXT DAY, the FBI has 19 NAMES AND MUGSHOTS of them, even though ALL THE EYEWITNESSES WERE DEAD!

Smelled funny then, STINKS now!

[FORD]

Originally posted by Warham
I would think the Twin Towers going down ANY way would be dramatic enough. That still doesn't answer my question, Keeyth. Why have nineteen Islamic terrorists hijack two planes, possibly getting caught in the process, just to put on a good show?

Yes. putting on the show was the entire point of the plane crashes. Especially the second hit, which was designed as THE media event. The planners of the attack (whomever you believe that to be) knew that every TV network would have a camera at the scene to film the aftermath of the first crash. And then right on cue, plane #2 slams into the other tower. It was done purely for shock value, regardless of whether or not the plane was occupied. (many eyewitnesses said it appeared to be a cargo plane with no windows)

And while an entire nation was still understandably in shock, they pulled the towers, adding to the horror, and the psychological programming.

Or in other words, doing exactly what the PNAC manifesto called for. A new "PERLE Harbor" to create public support for the coming global fascist agenda.

[Warham]

Actually, it was three days later, Keeyth.

You are batting .000 still, especially after giving faulty info.

[Warham]

Originally posted by FORD
Yes. putting on the show was the entire point of the plane crashes. Especially the second hit, which was designed as THE media event. The planners of the attack (whomever you believe that to be) knew that every TV network would have a camera at the scene to film the aftermath of the first crash. And then right on cue, plane #2 slams into the other tower. It was done purely for shock value, regardless of whether or not the plane was occupied. (many eyewitnesses said it appeared to be a cargo plane with no windows)

And while an entire nation was still understandably in shock, they pulled the towers, adding to the horror, and the psychological programming.

Or in other words, doing exactly what the PNAC manifesto called for. A new "PERLE Harbor" to create public support for the coming global fascist agenda.

What programming? 60+% of the public disagrees with George W. Bush now! He hardly has any of the support he had on 9/11.

[DrMaddVibe]

Originally posted by FORD
It is an established fact that Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy, both of whom have ties to Mossad, acquired the lease to the WTC a few months before the attacks.

It's an established "fact" that YOU didn't show how this is even a truthful run!

Originally posted by FORD
It is also a fact that Marvin Bush (Chimpy's brother and card carrying member of the BCE) was the CEO of the company providing security for the WTC during this time.

Card carrying member? I'm dying to know how one becomes a "member"!

Originally posted by FORD
Maintenance crews installed a "new sprinkler system" in the WTC in the weeks before the attacks. It's entirely plausible that explosive charges could have been placed in the building at this time, using the sprinkler system as a cover.

Another loose cannon statement after being challenged on the merits of attempting to carry out the notion of setting explosives after the 1st Twin Towers attack!

Originally posted by FORD
Silverstein admitted in a television interview that he gave the order to "pull" WTC Building 7. "Pull" means controlled demolition. Yet the power was cut to the entire WTC complex after the second plane hit the towers. Therefore there would have been no lights in building 7 allowing demolition crews to wire the building on that day. So the only possible answer is that the building was already set up for a controlled demolition. And if this is true of Building 7, then it could just as easily be true of Buildings 1 & 2 (the towers). Some have theorized that the buildings were ALWAYS wired for a controlled demolition, in the event that something could impact the towers and cause them to topple over onto Manhattan, rather than collapse onto themselves, as was done on 9/11/01.

Where is the link to him admitting this? Are you jumping to conclusions to fit what he said in to your fantasy delusion?

You guys and your Art Bell bullshit stories...put the crackpipe down.


BOO!

[BigBadBrian]

Originally posted by Keeyth
To save the salvageable items maybe, but if you don't do that, it's not going to stop the explosives from taking the building down just as effectively.

Wake up and smell the BULLSHIT you've been fed by the BCE all this time.

Keeyth, my opinion of you is nil.

You are officially a dumbass.

Congratulations.

[BigBadBrian]

Originally posted by DrMaddVibe
If you don't know what ne0-c0n means...don't use it.

Exactly. Well said. They throw around names without knowing their meanings. Typical.