Originally posted by sadaist
Watching that video, isn't Keith Olbermann excercising his 1st amendment right to free speech, which he crossed off the list as non-existent?
Watching that video, isn't Keith Olbermann excercising his 1st amendment right to free speech, which he crossed off the list as non-existent?
His comments are delivered in the context of Habeas Corpus in relation to the other items in the Bill of Rights.
Let's take a look at the trasnscript:
#######
Olbermann:
The reality is, without habeas corpus, a lot of other rights lose their meaning.
But if you look at the actual Bill of Rights — the first ten amendments to that pesky Constitution — you'll see just how many remain.
Well, ok, Number One's gone.
If you're detained without trial, you lose your freedom of religion, speech, the press and assembly. And you can't petition the government for anything.
#######
It never ceases to amaze me how casual conservatives are about the possibilities of losing our freedoms.
Are you really being fooled by the post-911 menatllity rhetoric? Or do you just take your freedom for granted?
Comment