Have The Dems Finally Found Their Nuts?

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
I actually liked the guy until his Mukasey vote.

A vote for Mukasey is like giving W, Darth, and Gonzalez "get out of jail free" cards/

Mukasey is a solid choice.

Why should he go on record about water boarding being torture. They can't get a consensus on what torture actually means. They make it sound like waterboarding is a common occurence, when it's only been used three times in five years.

[Satan]

They sure as Hell had a consensus on waterboarding after WWII, when they charged the Japanese with WAR CRIMES for using it.

And Levin (see Keith Olbermann thread) certainly had that consensus when he allowed the torture to be done to himself.

And I'm the Devil. I KNOW torture.

Mukrazy has no excuse. Schumer has no excuse. Feinstein has no excuse. There is no justification. NONE.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by WAR


. They make it sound like waterboarding is a common occurence, when it's only been used three times in five years.

How the fuck would you know??

[LoungeMachine]

He wont go on the record, because he was TOLD not to go on the record.

Bush, Cheney, and Gonzalez could be tried for WAR CRIMES.


But WARHAM knows when where, and how many times it's been used.

[DrMaddVibe]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
And I'd spot them the nu

You'd have to burp them out first!

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine


How the fuck would you know??

They can say whatever they want regarding those secret overseas CIA 'rendition' prisons, but spare me the "we rarely use it" crap...

There are Taliban fighters, who are not terrorists by any reasonable definition of the word, that HAVE been tortured at GITMO and in Afghanistan. That's not to mention the Iraqis inhumanely treated in the prison system set up there after the fall of Saddam, of which Abu Ghraib was just the tip of the iceberg.

These people working for Bush have ZERO.zero credibility when making such claims and statements...

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by WAR


They make it sound like waterboarding is a common occurence, when it's only been used three times in five years.

Seriously, I'd love WAR toactually have to back up something for once....

This sounds exactly like something you'd hear on Rush Limpdick.

How do you know this War?

What sources are you using?

What makes you think these sources know?

In a time when we are rendering people without due process all over the world, what makes you think you could possibly know this?


And while we're at it....

If it worked so well kalhid Sheik Mohammed, the supposed MASTERMIND OF 9/11

Why hasn't he been charged and brought to trial like we did with the Blind Sheik after the 1993 bombing?

You know, back when we actually arrested, tried, convicted, and jailed and/or executed terorists???

Remember those days?




This post of WAR's is the same lame bullshit like his claim he pays for the wars everyday by going to work



Care to cite your sources on "we've only used 4-5 times" ?????

[Warham]

Originally posted by Satan
They sure as Hell had a consensus on waterboarding after WWII, when they charged the Japanese with WAR CRIMES for using it.

And Levin (see Keith Olbermann thread) certainly had that consensus when he allowed the torture to be done to himself.

And I'm the Devil. I KNOW torture.

Mukrazy has no excuse. Schumer has no excuse. Feinstein has no excuse. There is no justification. NONE.

The Japanese were using it on uniformed enemy combatants. Even if I were to say that it's torture, how are Al Qaeda operatives protected by the Geneva Convention? What country do they represent?

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Bush, Cheney, and Gonzalez could be tried for WAR CRIMES.

No, they can't be tried for war crimes.

And who the hell would charge them, Lounge, even if it were possible? The UN gets their bread buttered by the United States.

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine


How the fuck would you know??

The CIA told me?

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by WAR
The CIA told me?

What are you, Agent Zimmerman now?

Please cite your sources on this, or just tell me you were talking out of your ass...

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine


What are you, Agent Zimmerman now?

Please cite your sources on this, or just tell me you were talking out of your ass...

Go to any of the major news networks. They had stories on it.

Start with the liberal ABC, and move on from there.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by WAR
Go to any of the major news networks. They had stories on it.

Start with the liberal ABC, and move on from there.

No shit?

Yeah, I've read those stories too, Rush.

NOT ONE gives a number of how many times it was used.

So I was right. You're talking out of your ass [again]

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
No shit?

Yeah, I've read those stories too, Rush.

NOT ONE gives a number of how many times it was used.

So I was right. You're talking out of your ass [again]

Really now? You didn't look hard enough. Google-Fu not good enough?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/11/exclusive-only-.html

[Warham]

Drinking again tonight?