-
-
I cut an pasted a summary of the research paper written by the guys that got your sample.
They thought it proved the opposite of what you did.
If you want to know who to trust with this shit it's quite simple.
Look for the word 'climatologist' which is what they call people who specialize in this stuff.
It's not rocket science...Comment
-
Apparently not.
Find me a climatologist that says there is no link between CO2 and climate change.
Incifuckingdently can you not see a pattern between the green line and the blue one in your graph?
You are arguing one thing whilst completely proving the opposite.
Comment
-
Seems to me you were doing the same...Comment
-
What was causing Co2 levels to peak like that thousands of years ago?Comment
-
The illuminati global jewish conspiracy alien lizards?Comment
-
Most charts have a key.Comment
-
Blah...Comment
-
Here is a off the top of my head source for your answer.
The Danish revolution, 1500-1800: an ... - Google Books
Sorry, I can't quote from it easily.
During the time period of about 1000 yeas ago would put they time line at the early 1900's. Ecology, generally, moves slower than world events. It was during that grand era that the major deforestation happened for fuel and resource reason. Furthermore, there was no reforestation ethics or mandates.
It would take the ecosystem a flip or two to level out and recover to the next point (for good or bad).MICHAEL G. MULLENTo put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.Comment
-
Those facts does not change the fact that I want to see the Antarctic ice caps gone, at least enough to see the Antarctica ground.MICHAEL G. MULLENTo put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.Comment
-
How much ground is guessed to be there?Comment
-
New housing allotment?Comment
Tweet
Comment