So is he racist?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Blackflag
    Banned
    • Apr 2006
    • 3406

    #31
    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    Nice complete mischaracterization. Yeah, the gov't wanted to get into the car business. GM wasn't for sale, it was on the brink...
    The government gave cash in exchange for a stake in the company. It happens all the time in bankruptcy. Explain what you think is 'mischaracterized?'


    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    By speeding GM out of bankruptcy in record time, forcing severe restructuring, and edging GM closer to profitability...
    ?

    It was the bankruptcy that gave the government control of the company. You can't say the bankruptcy is the government giving up control.

    As far as I know, the government hasn't done anything to relinquish control since the bankruptcy. You're arguing just for the sake of arguing. Bored?


    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    It's little different than a tax rebate give arbitrarily and in some cases almost regardless of who paid what.
    You're right...it's no different from the government arbitrarily giving out extraordinary tax rebates to random individuals...

    And when has the government ever done that again? Is there an IRS lotto that I'm not aware of??

    Comment

    • Dr. Love
      ROTH ARMY SUPREME
      • Jan 2004
      • 7833

      #32
      Originally posted by Nickdfresh
      Why so socialist?
      I've got the cure you're thinkin' of.

      http://i.imgur.com/jBw4fCu.gif

      Comment

      • LoungeMachine
        DIAMOND STATUS
        • Jul 2004
        • 32576

        #33
        Is it considered "racist" because he's depicted in "white face" ???

        Originally posted by Kristy
        Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
        Originally posted by cadaverdog
        I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

        Comment

        • bueno bob
          DIAMOND STATUS
          • Jul 2004
          • 22951

          #34
          Originally posted by LoungeMachine
          Is it considered "racist" because he's depicted in "white face" ???

          Twistin' by the pool.

          Comment

          • Fuct Jup
            Head Fluffer
            • Nov 2006
            • 236

            #35
            There was a Joker faced GW Bush as well. Was that racist?

            Anything left in that bottle?

            Comment

            • Nickdfresh
              SUPER MODERATOR

              • Oct 2004
              • 49646

              #36
              Originally posted by Blackflag
              The government gave cash in exchange for a stake in the company. It happens all the time in bankruptcy. Explain what you think is 'mischaracterized?'
              Because they didn't just buy it as a national car company like -say- France did Renault. It's not even remotely the same category...

              ?

              It was the bankruptcy that gave the government control of the company. You can't say the bankruptcy is the government giving up control.

              As far as I know, the government hasn't done anything to relinquish control since the bankruptcy. You're arguing just for the sake of arguing. Bored?
              Of course they're not. But they are going to send it back to the private sector eventually. They can't just insta-divest™...

              I'm not the one that started the "argument," Captain Semantics...

              You're right...it's no different from the government arbitrarily giving out extraordinary tax rebates to random individuals...

              And when has the government ever done that again? Is there an IRS lotto that I'm not aware of??
              They gave out the tax rebate/credit to whomever applied for it. How much really different is that? Except that actually using targeted gov't incentives and benefits such as vouchers or extending unemployment benefits tend to be far more effective in the long run...

              But carry on with your ideologue ideals of "libertarianism" that benefit foreign companies in nations with --oh!-- NATIONAL HEALTHCARE PROGRAMS that effectively serve as subsidies!

              Comment

              • Blackflag
                Banned
                • Apr 2006
                • 3406

                #37
                Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                Because they didn't just buy it as a national car company like -say- France did Renault. It's not even remotely the same category...
                Right. Not in the same category. Remind me again the difference between a government buying a company, like France and Renault...and a government exchanging cash for a majority stake in a company?


                Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                Of course they're not. But they are going to send it back to the private sector eventually. They can't just insta-divest™...
                Of course not. And the tm thing is cool. But you said they are untaking control. (Though that's not really a word.) Present tense. So what are they doing presently to "untake" control?




                Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                They gave out the tax rebate/credit to whomever applied for it. How much really different is that?
                Different than what? You said that it's "little different than a tax rebate given arbitrarily." I'm just asking when tax rebates have been given out like that before.


                Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                But carry on with your ideologue ideals of "libertarianism" that benefit foreign companies in nations with --oh!-- NATIONAL HEALTHCARE PROGRAMS that effectively serve as subsidies!
                Yawn. Stay on topic, if you can.

                Comment

                • bueno bob
                  DIAMOND STATUS
                  • Jul 2004
                  • 22951

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Fuct Jup
                  There was a Joker faced GW Bush as well. Was that racist?

                  Nope, which is exactly why I brought it up earlier. Obama as Joker wasn't exactly an original idea, nor racist.

                  Just ignorant due to the whole "Socialist" thing.
                  Twistin' by the pool.

                  Comment

                  • sadaist
                    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 11625

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Fuct Jup
                    There was a Joker faced GW Bush as well. Was that racist?

                    No. It's impossible to be racist towards white people.
                    “Great losses often bring only a numb shock. To truly plunge a victim into misery, you must overwhelm him with many small sufferings.”

                    Comment

                    • bueno bob
                      DIAMOND STATUS
                      • Jul 2004
                      • 22951

                      #40
                      Originally posted by sadaist
                      No. It's impossible to be racist towards white people.
                      I'm not sure I'd take it that far.
                      Twistin' by the pool.

                      Comment

                      • Nickdfresh
                        SUPER MODERATOR

                        • Oct 2004
                        • 49646

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Blackflag
                        Right. Not in the same category. Remind me again the difference between a government buying a company, like France and Renault...and a government exchanging cash for a majority stake in a company?
                        I guess I will, since you're a tad thick. The French nationalized Renault as a matter of permanent national policy early on while the US acquired GM as a temporary emergency measure...

                        Is it that fucking difficult? If it is, I'll make a coloring book for you...

                        Of course not. And the tm thing is cool. But you said they are untaking control. (Though that's not really a word.) Present tense. So what are they doing presently to "untake" control?
                        Wow, it's "not really a word." Thanks for pointing that out Captain Monosyllabic. Thanks for the writing tip!

                        Maybe I can pay you back by letting you know that words exist that contain more than two syllables. The English language is great!

                        Different than what? You said that it's "little different than a tax rebate given arbitrarily." I'm just asking when tax rebates have been given out like that before.
                        I don't know, I''m not a tax historian. But I'm pretty sure the Bush tax cuts were largely unprecedented in their scope...

                        Yawn. Stay on topic, if you can.

                        Oh, sure. Please define the "topic?" Is that which ever you decide to skip or actually quote? Because I noticed you have a habit of deleting whatever you can't answer, pussy.

                        Why don't YOU fucking stay "on topic?"
                        Last edited by Nickdfresh; 08-19-2009, 10:35 PM.

                        Comment

                        • Nickdfresh
                          SUPER MODERATOR

                          • Oct 2004
                          • 49646

                          #42
                          Originally posted by sadaist
                          No. It's impossible to be racist towards white people.
                          Oooh! The strawman argument of the night!!

                          Comment

                          • Blackflag
                            Banned
                            • Apr 2006
                            • 3406

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                            Oooh! The strawman argument of the night!!
                            You really need to give that up...

                            Comment

                            • Nickdfresh
                              SUPER MODERATOR

                              • Oct 2004
                              • 49646

                              #44
                              Originally posted by Blackflag
                              You really need to give that up...
                              I can't! It's like coke to John Belushi...

                              It's also the truth. When dolts revert back the the knee-jerk Rush Limbaugh-isms and typical "conservative" talking points, that's exactly what it is! An argument nobody is making. Did anyone here say that blacks can't be racist assholes? No.

                              Quite the opposite. Read Kristy's post about being hot and on the dance floor...
                              Last edited by Nickdfresh; 08-19-2009, 10:36 PM.

                              Comment

                              • Blackflag
                                Banned
                                • Apr 2006
                                • 3406

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                                I can't! It's like coke to John Belushi...

                                It's also the truth. When dolts revert back the the knee-jerk Rush Limbaugh-isms and typical "conservative" talking points, that's exactly what it is! An argument nobody is making. Did anyone here say that blacks can't be racist assholes? No.
                                Well at least go read the definition and find some examples, man. There are like 9 common argument fallacies, they've got to be on the internet somewhere. Shit!


                                Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                                Quite the opposite. Read Kristy's post about being hot and on the dance floor...
                                My curiosity is piqued. Link?

                                Comment

                                Working...