Sarah Palin Speech at Tea Party Convention

[jhale667]

When someone like Sarah Palin comes along, who IS attractive AND intelligent AND feminine, liberal minded men don't quite know what to do. So they lash out and tear her up.

C'mon, she might be feminine, I'll give you that one. I don't find her attractive, and it's painfully obvious she's NOT intelligent.

And then there's that voice...boner kill...

[diamondsgirl]

C'mon, she might be feminine, I'll give you that one. I don't find her attractive, and it's painfully obvious she's NOT intelligent.

And then there's that voice...boner kill...

thanks for proving my point

[jhale667]

I'm not saying women can't be both, I'm saying she's neither.

[diamondsgirl]

I'm not saying women can't be both, I'm saying she's neither.

Actually, I was referring to the boner comment.

[bueno bob]

I'm with Jay. I haven't found her to be an extremely bright weathergirl/model/career student/(former?) politician/sexpot/writer/pseudo-pundit/opportunist media whore at all. I'm all for intelligent, beautiful women (God knows I've spent ten great years with one of the best minds/bodies on the planet today), but I think the notion that Sarah is attractive is entirely subjective (and basically applicable only if you've got a MILF thing going on)...the notion that she's intelligent needs to be defended, as I've yet to see her say anything intelligent about...well, anything.

While I won't argue the media's done a hatchet job on her, let's face brass tax, she MORE than invited it by blatantly attempting to steal McCain's spotlight while being grossly unprepared for even the most basic questions - which she STILL is ("All of them are my favorites!") and thrusting her family into the spotlight and then having the brass to even TRY and act indignant about it once they were focused on by the media she was trying to woo with them in the first place.

The whole "Bridge to Nowhere" nonsense was just the flower that started off the cake and it's only gotten richer since then. Walking off the job as governor? In any SANE world, she'd have been unemployable for ANYTHING beyond a job at Taco Bell after that kind of shit, but wait...here comes FOX NEWS where she's all of a sudden angelic and going to "Save America!" with the rest of their entertainers...

Personally, I'd respect the Republican party a FUCK of a lot more if they had more actual leadership with interesting, forward-minded ideas and less bags of hot air spouting off about imaginary progressive conspiracies to "Destroy America!".

I'm fucking SICK of that attitude, it's borderline fucking treasonous as far as I'm concerned and until the Republicans can put a grownup out there with a REAL sense of responsibility to the people of America and NOT to their own fucking face time as opportunists (even if I don't necessarily agree with their politics), they'll get NO support of mine.

Even THEN it's not a sure thing, but at least they won't look as fucking retarded as they do now and that'll earn at least a FRACTION of my respect.

[Bob_R]

That explains why you leaned so far to the RIGHT over at RothChats v1.0

I don't know what that means.

I never posted in the political forum at RothChats v1.0

[Bob_R]

Haven't seen a couple of them, huh? They've got Biblespice beat all to shit, dude - trust me.

You're going by avatar pics? In all honesty one of the ladies was supposed to send me her pic but never did. Make of that what you will.

You have your opinion and I have mine dude. For the record I never mentioned the member ladies in this thread until you did. I think it would be best to keep them out of it. Happy Valentines' Day to them all!!

That being said this thread got rockin' once I proclaimed I'd like to nail Palin. Glad to be of service.

[Nickdfresh]

LOL @ liberal minded men of America (and other countries, apparantly)! In this country a woman is "allowed" to either be smart OR attractive. Not both. If you are attractive, you are automatically a dumb whore. If you are smart, you better look like a man or you are automatically a dumb whore.

When someone like Sarah Palin comes along, who IS attractive AND intelligent AND feminine, liberal minded men don't quite know what to do. So they lash out and tear her up.

Seriously, how can any of you have a problem with her saying she is proud to be an American?? WTF? Even THAT is wrong? Can she say anything that you will find OK? Probably not.

She's about as "intelligent" as Dan Quayle, who was also picked to be a "mimbo" VP...

Secondly, just because Palin is telegenic and good-looking doesn't mean she's intelligent nor worldly, and she was eminently unqualified. Much of the charges of her being a shallow, empty-headed fuckwit come from McCain's team of not-very-"liberal men" who indicated that she had the background knowledge of a sixth grader. She thought Africa was a country for fuck's sake!

And many liberal men have voted for and supported Nancy Pelosi, who is pretty old now, but was once pretty decent looking. And you can argue against Pelosi, and hate her policy positions and all that. But no one would call her stupid, and I'm pretty sure she could pick out the general vicinity of Egypt on a map!

You can't just argue that the backlash against Palin was just ironic sexism. I would argue that a really good looking woman whose extremely well read and educated will have far more authority when speaking, and there are hundreds of successful, physically attractive female politicians. But most serious contenders for the presidency are in their middle to late forties, so it's hard to call many politicians hotties at that age...

[Seshmeister]

LOL @ liberal minded men of America (and other countries, apparantly)! In this country a woman is "allowed" to either be smart OR attractive. Not both. If you are attractive, you are automatically a dumb whore. If you are smart, you better look like a man or you are automatically a dumb whore.

Your argument fails completely because Palin is a dumb whore.

A dumb lying whore as it happens.

Ok I can't prove the whore bit but she is a dumb liar.

Also I don't find her attractive. Physically she is attractive for a politician but her voice, stupidity and outlook on the world is as someone else said complete boner kill.

Anyway as I posted earlier you don't get to fuck her if you vote for her. This is close to my argument against buying Britney Spears albums...

[diamondsgirl]

[QUOTE=Nickdfresh;1430070]

Secondly, just because Palin is telegenic and good-looking doesn't mean she's intelligent nor worldly

exactly, but it doesnt make her a dumb whore, either

and she was eminently unqualified

and Barry was qualified?

and Clinton? he had the same qualifications as Palin. Both governors, but why are both these men automatically more qualified? because they have a cock? and Palin hasn't run for President, yet. It's a big time double standard no matter how you look at it. No one would ever discuss Barry's looks, or Clinton's "boner kill" of an accent.

And many liberal men have voted for and supported Nancy Pelosi, who is pretty old now, but was once pretty decent looking. And you can argue against Pelosi, and hate her policy positions and all that. But no one would call her stupid, and I'm pretty sure she could pick out the general vicinity of Egypt on a map!

exactly, she is voted for and supported now because she is old and no longer "pretty decent" looking. She was always intelligent, but never taken as seriously as she is now.

You can't just argue that the backlash against Palin was just ironic sexism. I would argue that a really good looking woman whose extremely well read and educated will have far more authority when speaking, and there are hundreds of successful, physically attractive female politicians.

I will argue that the backlash against Palin is 100% sexism, no doubt about it. It shows up, one way or another, in just about every post in this thread. it shows up in interviews when she is asked stupid shit like "who's taking care of your kids while your on the road campaigning??" WTF?? Did anyone ask Clinton that? or Obama that?

But most serious contenders for the presidency are in their middle to late forties, so it's hard to call many politicians hotties at that age...

like who? you mean Ferraro or H. Clinton? were they ever "hotties"?? LMAO.

My point is a woman can be attractive, and smart, and still be a good leader. But, many men in this country, still wont allow it. At least in their minds. And when Palin came along, they could not handle it, so they went into that "lets tear her up" mode. And they are clearly still there.

[Seshmeister]

Deluded bullshit.

They tear her up because she was a candidate for VP who couldn't name a newspaper, constantly lies, and can't address any issues like an adult never mind a credible politician.

She is also incredibly superstitious which I imagine wouldn't appeal to much to that guy that sticks his penis into you.

[diamondsgirl]

Your argument fails completely because Palin is a dumb whore.

A dumb lying whore as it happens.

Ok I can't prove the whore bit but she is a dumb liar.

Also I don't find her attractive. Physically she is attractive for a politician but her voice, stupidity and outlook on the world is as someone else said complete boner kill.

Anyway as I posted earlier you don't get to fuck her if you vote for her. This is close to my argument against buying Britney Spears albums...

My argument fails? You just proved it to be true . You would use the same argument for Sarah Palin as you would Britney Spears. I don't think you could have proven what I was saying any better if you tried. Thanks Sesh!!

And trust me...I don't want to fuck Sarah Palin.

[diamondsgirl]

She is also incredibly superstitious which I imagine wouldn't appeal to much to that guy that sticks his penis into you.

What?? can you please rephrase this? I have no clue what you are trying to say. I think it's a personal attack, but I'm not even sure.

Seriously, help me out here.

[diamondsgirl]

She is also incredibly superstitious which I imagine wouldn't appeal to much to that guy that sticks his penis into you.

Oh wait a minute, I get it. you are proving my point AGAIN. You can't have a discussion with or about a woman with out talking about sex and resorting to sexiest remarks.

You clearly have nothing to say with any merit, so just shut the fuck up. This isn't the dark ages any more.

Go make me a sandwich, bitch.

[Nickdfresh]

exactly, but it doesnt make her a dumb whore, either

I never said she was a "dumb whore," I said she was eminently unqualified. I have no idea if she's a "whore" but there are accusations that she had an affair...

and Barry was qualified?


and Clinton? he had the same qualifications as Palin. Both governors, but why are both these men automatically more qualified? because they have a cock? and Palin hasn't run for President, yet. It's a big time double standard no matter how you look at it. No one would ever discuss Barry's looks, or Clinton's "boner kill" of an accent.

Feel free to compare their education and backgrounds. Palin was trained to be a fuckwit sportscaster talking head and bounced around from college to college. "Barry" is a Harvard educated lawyer and ex-professor. Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar and is noted for his fearsome intellect even by, perhaps especially by, his political enemies. Incidently, he also completed his terms and never quit...

exactly, she is voted for and supported now because she is old and no longer "pretty decent" looking. She was always intelligent, but never taken as seriously as she is now.

She was always "supported" and voted for. She's from a political family and has spent her career as a politician...

I will argue that the backlash against Palin is 100% sexism, no doubt about it. It shows up, one way or another, in just about every post in this thread. it shows up in interviews when she is asked stupid shit like "who's taking care of your kids while your on the road campaigning??" WTF?? Did anyone ask Clinton that? or Obama that?

And I would argue that that's 100% bullshit. There are some that would say she's set feminism back decades in politics, and the fact that she's good looking was largely what got her the job as McCain's VP, which is also sort of sexist as several politicians were passed over...

like who? you mean Ferraro or H. Clinton? were they ever "hotties"?? LMAO.

I dunno, though I've seen pics of Clinton from the early 1970s and she wasn't that bad...

My point is a woman can be attractive, and smart, and still be a good leader. But, many men in this country, still wont allow it. At least in their minds. And when Palin came along, they could not handle it, so they went into that "lets tear her up" mode. And they are clearly still there.

And my point is that certain women can be good looking mental fuckwits and are handed positions as window dressing to appeal to a demographic precisely for their looks--which is sort of one of the definitions of sexism. Palin was promoted to her level of incompetence as governor and has been plagued by the very scandals of abuse of power and privilege she supposedly campaigned against...