(BCE appointed) Voting official seeks terrorism guidelines

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Keeyth
    Crazy Ass Mofo
    • Apr 2004
    • 3010

    #46
    Originally posted by Ally_Kat
    I already answered this and no, i'm not admitting anything. You're take is that thre is blame for that and that's the basis of my answer
    I asked what YOUR take was then...
    Knowing and believing are two very different things.

    It is the difference between the knowledge we accrue... ...and the knowledge we apply.

    Comment

    • Keeyth
      Crazy Ass Mofo
      • Apr 2004
      • 3010

      #47
      Originally posted by Ally_Kat
      what seems to you is not clear to use that work with them all the time


      Uh.... ....what?


      Then why bother with the changing of one's political party with whoever they vote for? That's not what you were leaning towards in your suggestions a couple of posts ago.
      I think it was... ...maybe you just misunderstood me... ...I'm very misunderstood you know!:D
      Knowing and believing are two very different things.

      It is the difference between the knowledge we accrue... ...and the knowledge we apply.

      Comment

      • Ally_Kat
        ROTH ARMY SUPREME
        • Jan 2004
        • 7612

        #48
        Originally posted by Keeyth
        I asked what YOUR take was then...
        And I answered that question already
        Roth Army Militia

        Comment

        • Ally_Kat
          ROTH ARMY SUPREME
          • Jan 2004
          • 7612

          #49
          Originally posted by Keeyth
          I think it was... ...maybe you just misunderstood me... ...I'm very misunderstood you know!:D
          oh, I hit the e key on my way to the t key. Sue me.

          And no, go and read. You were saying we should change parties due to who we vote for and that we shouldn't vote for a canidate in a party we don't agree with. Not everyone is hard right or left and there are some canidates that are closer to the middle that are appealing ot members in the other party. Maybe the people who find those canidates aren't interested in the party as a whole, but like that canidate. You were saying that the voter shouldn't vote for them because they are involved with a party the voter doesnt agree with, thus leaving a party line option or a no voting option, unless the voter desires to be associated with the other party until they vote for another canidate in their original party.
          Roth Army Militia

          Comment

          • Seshmeister
            ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

            • Oct 2003
            • 35755

            #50
            Ally helped steal the election for Bush...?

            Comment

            • Sgt Schultz
              Commando
              • Mar 2004
              • 1270

              #51
              Rice: No Plan to Delay National Election

              Rice: No Plan to Delay National Election
              Jul 13, 9:34 AM (ET)
              By ERICA WERNER

              WASHINGTON (AP) - The head of a new federal voting commission suggested to congressional leaders that there should be a process for canceling or rescheduling an election interrupted by terrorism, but national security adviser Condoleezza Rice said no such plan is being considered by the administration.

              Federal officials warned last week that intelligence indicates al-Qaida wants to attack the United States to disrupt the upcoming elections.

              "There does not appear to be a clear process in place to suspend or reschedule voting during an election if there is a major terrorist attack," DeForest B. Soaries, chairman of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, wrote in a letter Monday to Republican and Democratic leaders in the House and Senate. The Associated Press obtained a copy of the one-page letter.

              Rice said the Bush administration, while concerned about the impact of terrorism, is not thinking of postponing the elections.

              "We've had elections in this country when we were at war, even when we were in civil war. And we should have the elections on time. That's the view of the president, that's the view of the administration," Rice told CNN on Monday.

              Soaries also sent lawmakers copies of an earlier letter he wrote to Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge. In that letter, dated June 25, Soaries noted that Sept. 11, 2001, fell on Election Day in New York and state officials delayed voting until later that month. He wrote that no federal agency has the statutory authority to cancel or reschedule a federal election.

              Soaries also expressed concern in the earlier letter that increased Election Day security could intimidate some voters, highlighting the need for communication between security officials and election administrators. He raised that issue again in his letter to lawmakers.

              Soaries said Monday he was scheduled to meet early next week with Homeland Security officials to discuss the issues.

              The Help America Vote Act of 2002 created the Election Assistance Commission.

              Comment

              • Keeyth
                Crazy Ass Mofo
                • Apr 2004
                • 3010

                #52
                Re: Rice: No Plan to Delay National Election

                Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
                Rice: No Plan to Delay National Election
                Jul 13, 9:34 AM (ET)
                By ERICA WERNER

                WASHINGTON (AP) - The head of a new federal voting commission suggested to congressional leaders that there should be a process for canceling or rescheduling an election interrupted by terrorism, but national security adviser Condoleezza Rice said no such plan is being considered by the administration.

                Federal officials warned last week that intelligence indicates al-Qaida wants to attack the United States to disrupt the upcoming elections.

                "There does not appear to be a clear process in place to suspend or reschedule voting during an election if there is a major terrorist attack," DeForest B. Soaries, chairman of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, wrote in a letter Monday to Republican and Democratic leaders in the House and Senate. The Associated Press obtained a copy of the one-page letter.

                Rice said the Bush administration, while concerned about the impact of terrorism, is not thinking of postponing the elections.

                "We've had elections in this country when we were at war, even when we were in civil war. And we should have the elections on time. That's the view of the president, that's the view of the administration," Rice told CNN on Monday.

                Soaries also sent lawmakers copies of an earlier letter he wrote to Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge. In that letter, dated June 25, Soaries noted that Sept. 11, 2001, fell on Election Day in New York and state officials delayed voting until later that month. He wrote that no federal agency has the statutory authority to cancel or reschedule a federal election.

                Soaries also expressed concern in the earlier letter that increased Election Day security could intimidate some voters, highlighting the need for communication between security officials and election administrators. He raised that issue again in his letter to lawmakers.

                Soaries said Monday he was scheduled to meet early next week with Homeland Security officials to discuss the issues.

                The Help America Vote Act of 2002 created the Election Assistance Commission.
                The way I see it, the only way for Bush to stay in office any longer WOULD be to delay the election. No wonder he wants this idea to go thru!!:D
                Knowing and believing are two very different things.

                It is the difference between the knowledge we accrue... ...and the knowledge we apply.

                Comment

                Working...