If this is your first visit to the Roth Army, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
What some people are saying is those buildings fell too fast. Something had to cut the steel. Then there apparently were beams cut clean. Then information on this new kind of thermite comes out in the open. It can be detonated remotely so you don't have all the wires and such.
But don't you see?
This new thermite doesn't exist. The truthers have invented it. They had to because the original thermite theory fell to bits even by their standards.
It's a logical leap on top of a non existent material. Show me evidence of this 'nano thermite'. Where did Steve Jones find out about it? Why can't he show a scientific paper showing it's discovery? Why can't he show a sample of it? Why can't he explain how they would get hundreds of tons into the buildings?
What separates MICs from traditional thermites is that the oxidizer and a reducing agent, normally iron oxide and aluminium are not a fine powder, but rather nanoparticles. This dramatically increases the reactivity relative to micrometre-sized powder thermite. As the mass transport mechanisms that slow down the burning rates of traditional thermites are not so important at these scales, the reactions become kinetically controlled and much faster.
Basically thermite is just iron oxide and aluminum mixed at a certain ratio. Nano thermite is the particles of both are smaller. Now I don't know what the end molecular result is from burning the stuff. I see what you are saying, it can be spun petty easy by just saying the rust on the steel was an ingredient in thermite and it was found at the site. It wouldn't even be a lie and then hype that into a conspiracy theory. I mean there's a lot of money to be made in conspiracy theories these days. Hmmmm maybe I should get with Ford and we both can make some money at this.
All I know is you don't want to mix more than 3% heroine in with the sucrose or you are one dead mother fucker. The things you learn reading Keith Richard's book.
Like I said we can debate the details of 9/11 until we are blue in the face but look at what has happened to the country since then. We all know building 7 went down. Whether it was a big fart or nano thermite can be debated but damn Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense. We know you know and don't play dumb with us Mr. Aspartame.
I've just been checking the Nano Thermite page on Wiki.
All the people writing and updating don't do work on other science Wiki pages but they do contribute a lot to 9-11 pages, conspiracy theories and right wing think groups.
Well surprise fucking surprise.
Also if you look at the articles cited in support of the page they don't add up with what the page is saying and constantly stress the tiny amounts of this substance that have been created only in labs and after 9-11.
I noticed nanothermite.org too. A website you would think would tell you about this chemical, places that produce it etc but no it's a list of circular links to the same Steve Jones shit. Looks like it was set up recently anonymously.
The more I look at this it isn't just nutcases on the internet it's quite a sophisticated con operation.
What a bunch of cunts making a living out of 9-11 by deception.
Comment