The Gun Control Thread
Collapse
X
-
-
So what most people do when they sell a gun is sell it on consignment at a gun dealer. They sell the gun and take a percentage and the new purchaser has to fill out the paperwork and pass the FBI background check like they were purchasing a new gun. I don't know anyone who would be stupid enough to sell a gun to someone they don't know. They did 30 years ago. They don't now. People used to hang guns on their wall then or keep them in big display cases. They don't now. People steal them.No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!Comment
-
-
How would you know? Do you buy and sell guns? That's the legal side of it. The black market is bigger than you would ever know. The guns are always there. The bad guys are going to have them regardless. The only way to get them would be to turn the country into a police state and even at that you aren't going to get them all.
It's not the guns anyways. It's society falling apart for a number of reasons. Going after the guns is just a feel good thing plus the politicians and bankers want them gone because they fear the public may turn on them once the public wakes up to all the shit that has been done to them. So they use the media to get everyone all stirred up and emotional and sell the feel good thing to do which usually is not the smart thing to do.Last edited by Nitro Express; 03-17-2013, 04:02 AM.No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!Comment
-
Comment
-
Sure it is. I want to know and I want to know how many and what kind of guns you have. I also want your medical records to see if you are mentally ill. I want to know everything about you.
That's what you liberals are selling at the moment. What? You can't take your own medicine?No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!Comment
-
Oh, FFS!
"The only way to get" WHAT?!
Why are you gun-huggers so fucking paranoid?
No one is taking your fucking guns!!!
But you'd better make damned sure your military weapons don't wind up in the wrong hands.
THAT needs to be the law!Comment
-
Sure it is. I want to know and I want to know how many and what kind of guns you have. I also want your medical records to see if you are mentally ill. I want to know everything about you.
That's what you liberals are selling at the moment. What? You can't take your own medicine?
Did I ask to buy anything from you?
Did I offer to sell or trade anything to you?
No?
Fuck off, then.
That's what YOU need to know.
You ALSO need to know..that the NRA bubble you're living in has little to do with reality.
The NRA is a fucking conservative super PAC, nothing more, nothing less.
All of it's members pay the $35 membership fee, or whatever it is now, they send you a window sticker, a membership card, and a newsletter full of neo-con propaganda to make you believe you "need" them to "protect" the 2nd amendment for you, because you're all too fucking stupid to realize absolutely NOTHING in the Bill Of Rights will ever be eliminated.
Meanwhile,....they're promoting their own agenda and using YOUR MONEY as a contribution for politicians who couldn't get elected on their own record, but if the "fear" of the 2nd amendment can be exploited....they might have a chance.
Let me pause here for a second...
Give me 1 instance....JUST ONE....where a civilian would not have survived without being an owner of a military assault weapon. JUST ONE.
FUCK the NRA.
Cocksuckers.
Did I ever tell you about the time one of their representatives called me and asked me to join?
It went like this;
NRA ME
Hello?
Hello, Mr.^@%@%@, my name is ---- I'm calling on behalf of the National Rifle Association. How are you today?
I'm good..
I'm calling today, because I have some important news..The U.N. is passing a resolution to make it illegal for American citizens to own guns. Have you heard of the 2nd Amendment?
yes?
Would you like to become a member of the NRA today and help congress fight this new law?
What new law?
The one the UN passed against the United states saying it's citizens can no longer own firearms. The cost of the membership is 35 dollars, with it, you'll get a newsletter...
Hold on...
Yes?
Did you just say, the UN passed a law against the US?
Uh, yes..well. it's a resolution that will make it illegal for Americans....
How much is the membership?
It's 35 dollars. That comes with-
So let's get straight....Iraq just held elections and is now recognized as a sovereign nation to the UN. Therefore can not get involved in it's "1 AK per household law", correct?
I'm not sure..
No, they can't. But you want me to believe that the UN is worried about the citizens of the US owning ANY guns, and have passed a resolution making it illegal to own firearms of ANY KIND, even though the US is a sovereign nation?
The UN wants to disarm America..
..Yet they don't give a shit about the Americans being killed by AK's in Iraq, which are legal...
That's correct.
Did the NRA contribute money to George W Bush in the last election?
Yes, we did..
Then fuck you. You're not getting any of my money, and if your newsletter is anything like that lie you just told me about the UN, I'm not sure why anyone would read it.
*click*
Parasites.Last edited by hideyoursheep; 03-17-2013, 04:56 AM.Comment
-
Military weapons? You mean like a Brown Bess musket or a Lee Enfield? What are wrong hands? You have no idea what your are talking about. It's all emotional film flam from the television shows.No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!Comment
-
Military weapons. You're asking me what that means?
Assault rifles. 20 or more rnd capacity magazines.
Now, I have never been to Ft. Riley, but I don't think 1st ID is using muskets anymore.
Don't fucking play games with me, dude....20 dead babies aren't fucking funny to me.Comment
-
Comment
-
Assault weapons ban won't be in dems' gun bill
AP
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has decided that a proposed assault weapons ban won't be part of a gun control bill the Senate plans to debate next month, the sponsor of the ban said Tuesday, a decision that means the ban stands little chance of survival.
Instead, Sen. Dianne Feinstein said she will be able to offer her ban on the military-style firearms as an amendment. Feinstein is all but certain to need 60 votes from the 100-member Senate to prevail, but she faces solid Republican opposition and likely defections from some moderate Democrats.
"I very much regret it," Feinstein, D-Calif., told reporters of Reid's decision. "I tried my best."
Feinstein, an author of the 1994 assault weapons ban that expired after a decade, said that Reid, D-Nev., told her of the decision on Monday.
There are 53 Democrats in the Senate, plus two independents who usually vote with them.
An assault-type weapon was used in the December massacre at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn., that revived gun control as a top issue in Washington. Banning those firearms was among the proposals President Barack Obama made in January in response to those slayings.
The assault weapons ban was the most controversial of the major proposals to restrict guns that have been advanced by Obama and Senate Democrats. Because of that, it had been expected that the assault weapons measure would be left out of the initial package the Senate considers, with Democrats hoping the Senate could therefore amass the strongest possible vote for the overall legislation.
Having a separate vote on assault weapons might free moderate Democratic senators facing re-election next year in Republican-leaning states to vote against the assault weapons measure, but then support the remaining overall package of gun curbs.
Gun control supporters consider a strong Senate vote important because the Republican-run House has shown little enthusiasm for most of Obama's proposals.
Feinstein said Reid told her there will be two votes.
One would be on her assault weapons ban, which also includes a ban on ammunition magazines that carry more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The second would just be on prohibiting the high-capacity magazine clips.
Many Democrats think the ban on large-capacity magazines has a better chance of getting 60 votes than the assault weapons ban.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has approved four gun control measures this month, including Feinstein's barring assault weapons and high capacity magazines. The others would expand required federal background checks for firearms buyers, increase federal penalties for illegal gun trafficking and boost school safety money.
Comment
-
A La Grange couple was charged Monday in connection with a violent road rage incident that happened Sunday afternoon off U.S. Highway 70 in Carteret County.
La Grange, N.C. — A man and woman from La Grange were charged Monday afternoon in connection with a violent road rage incident that happened Sunday afternoon off U.S. Highway 70 in Carteret County.
According to investigators, Bradley Russell Turner fired several shots into a pickup truck after he was beaten by two men about 1 p.m. Video released by investigators showed Russell asking the driver of a pickup truck why he ran him off the road before the pickup truck driver and his passenger threw him to the ground.
Christy Marie Turner provided Bradley Turner with the gun from inside the SUV during the altercation.
No one was seriously injured in the incident.
Bradley Turner, of 3432 Institute Road, is charged with discharging a weapon into occupied property, two counts of assault by pointing a gun, assault and battery, going armed to the terror of the public and injury to personal property. He received a $37,500 bond.A NATION OF COWARDS - Jeffrey R. SnyderComment
-
Eat Us And Smile
Cenk For America 2024!!
Justice Democrats
"If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992Comment
Comment