Ford & Elvis

[FORD]

Growing up here in Boeing country, you learn somethings about airplanes. One thing is that their bodies are made of aluminum, not steel. The pentagon is built in the form of 5 "rings" Meaning that there are 10 solid concrete walls between the outside of the Pentagon and the center Whatever impacted the building's outer layer would have crushed like a beer can before it ever made it through 10 walls.

[ELVIS]

Growing up in reality, you learn something about reality...

[FORD]

Notice that even this picture shows the roof of the Pentagon still solid with no collapse. If this were a Boeing 757, the tail of the plane would have to be above the roof line.

Also, a huge plane supposedly flew in at 500 MPH nearly on the ground, yet the guard rail around the Pentagon was not touched?? Hello??

And where's the 100 foot crater in front of the Pentagon claimed in the "official story"?

[ELVIS]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
and yet NO sign of it anywhere, in any photo.

If I'm so crazy, why can't we find any photos?

You can find if them if you look...

[FORD]

Originally posted by ELVIS


Growing up in reality, you learn something about reality...

Careful... you just posted YET ANOTHER PHOTO WITH THE ROOF INTACT which proves there was no tail section, and therefore, NO PLANE.

And that single shred of aluminum placed at the scene is just about as real as Atta's passport surviving a 7000 degree fire at the WTC.

[ELVIS]

Originally posted by FORD

Notice that even this picture shows the roof of the Pentagon still solid with no collapse. If this were a Boeing 757, the tail of the plane would have to be above the roof line.

So, you're saying that the aluminum tail of an airplane is strong enough to break the concrete roofline of the pentagon ??

[FORD]

What I am saying it that the photos usually shown of the Pentagon attack show the collapse of the section, with the implication that the building was hit, from floor to roof, by a Boeing 757. Yet pictures posted by you and Max, both defenders of the BCE's story, prove that the impact did not touch the roof, did not collapse the section of the building, did not even rip away the guardrail surrounding the building, and therefore, could not have been a jumbo jetliner, as erroneously reported. Initial press reports actually said it was a truck bomb, but given the precision of the 15 foot round hole, I'd guess a missile.

[ELVIS]

Your guess is bullshit!

Your bullshit makes me want to insult you with more fat jokes, but that's not my style...

Why can't you consider reality ????

What happened to flight 77 and it's 50 plus passengers ??

Fuck you dude!

[MAX]

Ok and let me get this straight.........

A jet crashing into an enourmous building "did not" happen because the tail of the plane did not survive the massive impact from a jet loaded with fuel?

It wasn't an accidental crash!!!! The point was immediate impact!!!! We are lucky that it only caused such small damage considering what they were trying to do?

They used the jet as a fucking missile (Which, infact backs up your theory) to divebomb at full speed. Therefore, no sliding at all!!!!

Make any sense?

[MAX]

Originally posted by ELVIS
Why can't you consider reality ????

What happened to flight 77 and it's 50 plus passengers ??

No shit dude. By this theory we probably shot them down cos Bush's plan was fucked up, right?

Yeah, the passengers were not heroes but victims of the BCE? LOL

I'm just fucking blown away by this nonsense. Seriously?

[ELVIS]

Amazing, huh ??

[MAX]

Too many Sci-Fi movies is my analogy? lol.

[ELVIS]

It must be something like that...

Maybe he was abducted...

haha!

[FORD]

Originally posted by MAX
Ok and let me get this straight.........

A jet crashing into an enourmous building "did not" happen because the tail of the plane did not survive the massive impact from a jet loaded with fuel?

In the video "9-11 in Plane Site, they freeze frame on a shot of the Pentagon after the collapse. You see office spaces cut in half by the collapse. You see furniture, computers, even stacks of paper sitting where they should be in the offices right next to the giant hole. If the same jet fuel which was allegedly hot enough to melt the frame of the WTC 70 some stories below impact was present in the Pentagon, how could paper have survived? Even the steel file cabinets, less dense than the WTC frame, should have been damaged. But they were not. Which means the presence of jet fuel is much less likely.

It wasn't an accidental crash!!!! The point was immediate impact!!!! We are lucky that it only caused such small damage considering what they were trying to do?

They used the jet as a fucking missile (Which, infact backs up your theory) to divebomb at full speed. Therefore, no sliding at all!!!!

Make any sense?

Not really. This is a 757, not a Blue Angels stunt flight. You would have to be one Hell of a pilot to be able to bring a behemoth plane into a position like that to hit the building on the ground floor, yet not even touch the guardrail surrounding the building. Yet we have been told that the Saudi Hijackers weren't even interested in learning about landings. Simply put, no half assed amateur would be capable of landing a plane of those dimensions at an angle like that.

Let alone alter the laws of physics so the plane fit the actual impact hole.

[Big Train]

Ford, give it up, this theory is just beyond retarded. Flying at 500 MPH, I'm sure they missed the guardrail. Hell if they did hit it, they make not have made the building, instead impacting on the ground around it.

If it WASN"T a PLANE, then what was it, a missle? Would not someone, or say, the fucking state of the art video system have seen something? Or is it because they didn't release that video to some 3rd rate crackpot website, that you can't possibly believe it?