Can Wolfgang be the difference from playing Arena's instead of some Stadium Gigs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shrek the Ogre
    Full On Cocktard
    • May 2007
    • 47

    Can Wolfgang be the difference from playing Arena's instead of some Stadium Gigs?

    will stadium promoters back off because of wolf and no mike??
  • PlexiBrown
    Commando
    • Mar 2006
    • 1264

    #2
    This whole Wolf/Mike thing has become an illness for many.
    And God heard the voice of the lad. Then the angel of God called to Hagar out of heaven, and said to her, “What ails you, Hagar? Genesis 21:17

    Comment

    • sadaist
      TOASTMASTER GENERAL
      • Jul 2004
      • 11625

      #3
      Originally posted by Shrek the Ogre
      will stadium promoters back off because of wolf and no mike??
      The difference between stadiums & arenas is 11 years of pissing on the legacy by the sisters. Promoters are reluctant to touch these guys now, especially after the 2004 debacle. But they have to, it's Van fucking Halen.
      “Great losses often bring only a numb shock. To truly plunge a victim into misery, you must overwhelm him with many small sufferings.”

      Comment

      • Little Lamont
        Head Fluffer
        • Mar 2007
        • 371

        #4
        I like arenas better anyway. The light show has more impact. I saw the
        Stones in a Stadium once and they actually came on before the sun went down. Totally fucked up the excitment of the house lights going down, you know?

        Comment

        • sadaist
          TOASTMASTER GENERAL
          • Jul 2004
          • 11625

          #5
          Originally posted by Little Lamont
          I like arenas better anyway. The light show has more impact. I saw the
          Stones in a Stadium once and they actually came on before the sun went down. Totally fucked up the excitment of the house lights going down, you know?
          Yeah, but the difference in crowd size and being outside turns a concert into a larger than life event. I've seen The Stones 3 times, all in stadiums.
          “Great losses often bring only a numb shock. To truly plunge a victim into misery, you must overwhelm him with many small sufferings.”

          Comment

          • Romeo Delight
            ROCKSTAR

            • Feb 2005
            • 5174

            #6
            Dave was never a fan of Stadiums.

            Wasn't one of the reasons he bailed is because the brothers wanted to tour less and do stadium shows?
            sigpicRoth Army Canada

            Comment

            • Little Lamont
              Head Fluffer
              • Mar 2007
              • 371

              #7
              Originally posted by sadaist
              Yeah, but the difference in crowd size and being outside turns a concert into a larger than life event. I've seen The Stones 3 times, all in stadiums.
              3 Stones shows? Way to go, my man!

              As for VH, I'll be there if they're playing in a barn.

              Comment

              • VanHalener
                ROCKSTAR

                • Nov 2006
                • 5451

                #8
                Originally posted by PlexiBrown
                This whole Wolf/Mike thing has become an illness for many.
                If being sick over wanting to see the real Van Halen was a contest, I'd be ranked in the top ten. I am sick over this bullshit, but what can I do? Nada!
                <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RdAU0EXWIbQ"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RdAU0EXWIbQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>



                Mike Anthony is part of the real van Halen. I swear, man! Really! Here, it's a little blurry but see for yourself...



                Mike is missed in this intro, but he's in there. Hear him?:D

                <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/O97FVCYmEPo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/O97FVCYmEPo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

                Mike is not spotlighted in either vid, but he's there, right? Right. I am sick over this bullshit. So close, but so very far away.

                Van Halen is:

                David Lee Roth
                Eddie Van Halen
                Alex Van Halen
                Mike Anthony

                There is no substitute.

                God Bless Wolfgang Vanhalen and his future.

                THANK GOD ROTH IS BACK!!!!!!!!!!

                (fingers still crossed)

                Oh, and about the studiums...Everyone is gun shy with this whole thing. Smaller venues are going to be AWESOME, JACK!
                Last edited by VanHalener; 08-11-2007, 01:58 PM.
                ~Only you can prevent low volume~

                Comment

                • Eddie's Booze
                  Head Fluffer
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 326

                  #9
                  Little Guitars WOW!!! That is a GRATE Song one of Van Halen's best. They wanna be playing that when I go see them play.
                  http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thu...moking_dog.jpg

                  Comment

                  • Antman
                    Commando
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 1261

                    #10
                    The same promoters do arena and stadiums. Did promoters back off Pink Floyd with no Roger Waters? Metallica with 3 different bassists? Guns and Roses? The biggest liabilty in recent rock history? No. Promoters see $$$$. And you know what? As much as we piss and moan about getting fucked by VH the past 23 years and how Ed's an asshole, etc, etc, we'll still fork over our paychecks for nosebleeds. And the promoters know that. So to answer you question, No.
                    When the shit hits the fan, close your mouth and duck.

                    Comment

                    • ROTHisGOD
                      Head Fluffer
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 234

                      #11
                      Agreed...

                      Comment

                      • wawijr
                        Roth Army Recruit
                        • Aug 2007
                        • 2

                        #12
                        I'd rather see arenas played too. Arenas were made for band like VH.
                        I don't know if VH can pull off a whole tour of stadiums, but they could surely do very well in the big city stadiums (esp LA) and if they add some big name openers.
                        The Police are doing a few stadium gigs this year. The Stones are the kings at that. I'm a Stones frreak! Out of the 12 times since 1989 i saw 7 in the stadiums

                        Comment

                        • Terry
                          DIAMOND STATUS
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 12133

                          #13
                          Van Halen wouldn't be filling stadiums (let's say 50,000 + as a benchmark) even if Anthony were there.

                          Only time they really ever did was when they were at the top of a bill that had a LOT of other name acts on it (a la the US Fest or the Monsters of Rock tour).

                          It's not to say they might not want to try, but I think there'd be more than a few empty seats if they did.

                          I have doubts they could even fill a 20,000 seat arena for a two-night stand these days, outside of maybe LA.

                          This ain't 1996 anymore. A decade plus of time has elapsed, and the activity that has transpired under the name Van Halen during that time hasn't exactly built on the frenzy people had to see the CVH lineup in 1996.

                          I'd say safe money would bet they could fill 15,000-20,000 seat halls for one night shots in each venue long as the ticket prices are reasonable. Maybe multi-nights or a couple of stadium gigs if they hit the road with one or two established acts.

                          The die-hards may not wanna face it, but broad-based interest in the band has waned.
                          Scramby eggs and bacon.

                          Comment

                          • binnie
                            DIAMOND STATUS
                            • May 2006
                            • 19145

                            #14
                            Originally posted by sadaist
                            The difference between stadiums & arenas is 11 years of pissing on the legacy by the sisters. Promoters are reluctant to touch these guys now, especially after the 2004 debacle. But they have to, it's Van fucking Halen.
                            Bingo.

                            That and the fact that these days there are very few bands who can fill stadiums.

                            As far as I'm concerned, filling 15-20000 seaters every night is quite a success after 23 years away and pissing off your fanbase.
                            The Power Of The Riff Compels Me

                            Comment

                            • frankfasteddie
                              Roadie
                              • Dec 2005
                              • 115

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Terry
                              Van Halen wouldn't be filling stadiums (let's say 50,000 + as a benchmark) even if Anthony were there.

                              Only time they really ever did was when they were at the top of a bill that had a LOT of other name acts on it (a la the US Fest or the Monsters of Rock tour).

                              It's not to say they might not want to try, but I think there'd be more than a few empty seats if they did.

                              I have doubts they could even fill a 20,000 seat arena for a two-night stand these days, outside of maybe LA.

                              This ain't 1996 anymore. A decade plus of time has elapsed, and the activity that has transpired under the name Van Halen during that time hasn't exactly built on the frenzy people had to see the CVH lineup in 1996.

                              I'd say safe money would bet they could fill 15,000-20,000 seat halls for one night shots in each venue long as the ticket prices are reasonable. Maybe multi-nights or a couple of stadium gigs if they hit the road with one or two established acts.

                              The die-hards may not wanna face it, but broad-based interest in the band has waned.
                              I don't know about not selling out 20000 seat arena's, theres a lot of people who have waited 20 years for this and have a little money now. Can't picture them not selling out fast but I hope so. I wish it was just die hard CVH Fans no sheep and tickets at 20 a pop.

                              They could toss a couple pieces of pizza in and a couple beers for making us wait 20 years
                              Last edited by frankfasteddie; 08-13-2007, 11:22 AM.
                              Are you Mr. Roth? I said yes I am. She said well Mr. Roth I can't serve you anymore because I think your drunk and if I was you girlfriend I'd put poison in your drink! And I looked in the bottle and I said why you old witch if I was your boyfriend I'd fucking well drink it too!!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...