Yeah, but I don't think that makes Clinton responsible for this anywhere near what Bush is...
Rumsfeld admitted a "missile" hit Pentagon...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Keeyth
Well, then WHY didn't he take credit for it?? You've seen how these Musilm extremists are when they do something. They put it all over Al-Jazeera TV, they make demands, they take the credit for what they are doing to show the infidels they mean business.
bin Laden never took credit for it. He never made any demands, at least not until he was blamed for the whole thing. How do we really KNOW who was behind this? Whoever the BCE tells us is? I'm just not that gullible, sorry.
Oh, and here's a theory on a lot of your questions, Baby's on Fire and diamondD:
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/valentine.htm
That plane looks nothing like the ones that hit the WTC. And if you think it would be hard for a pilot to make that turn into the Pentagon, how hard would it be to do it remotely?
Nice fodder for the tin foil crowd for sure.Meet us in the future, not the pastureComment
-
Originally posted by diamondD
No, it's a stupid theory. That's where you got your "purses" theory?
That plane looks nothing like the ones that hit the WTC. And if you think it would be hard for a pilot to make that turn into the Pentagon, how hard would it be to do it remotely?
Nice fodder for the tin foil crowd for sure.
It explains things a lot better than the "official story" does.
So... ...what the plane looks like is why you discount the theory????Knowing and believing are two very different things.
It is the difference between the knowledge we accrue... ...and the knowledge we apply.Comment
-
Originally posted by diamondD
No, it's a stupid theory. That's where you got your "purses" theory?
That plane looks nothing like the ones that hit the WTC. And if you think it would be hard for a pilot to make that turn into the Pentagon, how hard would it be to do it remotely?
Knowing and believing are two very different things.
It is the difference between the knowledge we accrue... ...and the knowledge we apply.Comment
-
Originally posted by Warham
You seem surprised?
You remember that story about Sandy Burgler taking those documents by 'accident' right?
Originally posted by KristyDude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.Originally posted by cadaverdogI posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?Comment
-
AP: Clinton Adviser Probed in Terror Memos
3 minutes ago Add U.S. National - AP to My Yahoo!
By JOHN SOLOMON
WASHINGTON - President Clinton (news - web sites)'s national security adviser, Sandy Berger, is the focus of a criminal investigation after admitting he removed highly classified terrorism documents from a secure reading room during preparations for the Sept. 11 commission hearings, The Associated Press has learned.
Berger's home and office were searched earlier this year by FBI (news - web sites) agents armed with warrants. Some drafts of a sensitive after-action report on the Clinton administration's handling of al-Qaida terror threats during the December 1999 millennium celebration are still missing.
Berger and his lawyer said Monday night he knowingly removed handwritten notes he had taken from classified anti-terror documents he reviewed at the National Archives by sticking them in his jacket and pants. He also inadvertently took copies of actual classified documents in a leather portfolio, they said.
"I deeply regret the sloppiness involved, but I had no intention of withholding documents from the commission, and to the contrary, to my knowledge, every document requested by the commission from the Clinton administration was produced," Berger said in a statement to the AP.
Berger served as Clinton's national security adviser for all of the president's second term and most recently has been informally advising Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry (news - web sites). Clinton asked Berger last year to review and select the administration documents that would be turned over to the commission.
The FBI searched Berger's home and office with warrants earlier this year after employees of the National Archives told agents they believed they witnessed Berger put documents into his clothing while reviewing sensitive Clinton administration papers, officials said.
When asked, Berger said he returned some of the classified documents, which he found in his office, and all of the handwritten notes he had taken from the secure room, but said he could not locate two or three copies of the highly classified millennium terror report.Comment
-
Just one problem – the central claim of their argument turned out to be false. The papers that Sandy Berger removed were not originals at all. They were actually copies of a report that was reportedly spread widely around the administration when it was released in 1999. This explains why Justice Department investigators found that Berger “‘did not have an intent to hide any of the content of the documents’ or conceal facts from the commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.”Originally posted by KristyDude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.Originally posted by cadaverdogI posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?Comment
-
duh.
THEY WERE COPIES
NOT ORIGINALS
duh
Facts = what a conceptOriginally posted by KristyDude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.Originally posted by cadaverdogI posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?Comment
-
Seriously War, you just need to ask Slick Willie out on a date already and satisfy that craving you have. Turn your obsession into reality.ROTH ARMY MILITIA
Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
Sharky sometimes needs things spelled out for him in explicit, specific detail. I used to think it was a lawyer thing, but over time it became more and more evident that he's merely someone's idiot twin.Comment
-
So it's okay to destroy government documents from the National Archives now...that's just great how low the bar gets lowered when its one of theirs...but bar the door and burn down the house..."its impeachable!!!"...if its someone from the right.
Amazing.
Wrong is wrong.Last edited by DrMaddVibe; 08-22-2005, 06:53 PM.Comment
-
Originally posted by Guitar Shark
Seriously War, you just need to ask Slick Willie out on a date already and satisfy that craving you have. Turn your obsession into reality.
By the way, what do you think of Berger stuffing documents stamped 'Top Secret' down his trousers to hide the Clinton administration's ineptness regarding terrorism?
Comment
Comment