Olbermann: Bush, Cheney should resign

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FORD
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    • Jan 2004
    • 59948

    Olbermann: Bush, Cheney should resign

    Olbermann: Bush, Cheney should resign

    ‘I didn’t vote for him, but he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job.’

    SPECIAL COMMENT
    By Keith Olbermann
    Anchor, 'Countdown'
    Updated: 5:13 p.m. PT July 3, 2007

    “I didn’t vote for him,” an American once said, “But he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job.”

    That—on this eve of the 4th of July—is the essence of this democracy, in 17 words. And that is what President Bush threw away yesterday in commuting the sentence of Lewis “Scooter” Libby.

    The man who said those 17 words—improbably enough—was the actor John Wayne. And Wayne, an ultra-conservative, said them, when he learned of the hair’s-breadth election of John F. Kennedy instead of his personal favorite, Richard Nixon in 1960.

    “I didn’t vote for him but he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job.”

    The sentiment was doubtlessly expressed earlier, but there is something especially appropriate about hearing it, now, in Wayne’s voice: The crisp matter-of-fact acknowledgment that we have survived, even though for nearly two centuries now, our Commander-in-Chief has also served, simultaneously, as the head of one political party and often the scourge of all others.

    We as citizens must, at some point, ignore a president’s partisanship. Not that we may prosper as a nation, not that we may achieve, not that we may lead the world—but merely that we may function.

    But just as essential to the seventeen words of John Wayne, is an implicit trust—a sacred trust: That the president for whom so many did not vote, can in turn suspend his political self long enough, and for matters imperative enough, to conduct himself solely for the benefit of the entire Republic.

    Our generation’s willingness to state “we didn’t vote for him, but he’s our president, and we hope he does a good job,” was tested in the crucible of history, and earlier than most.

    And in circumstances more tragic and threatening. And we did that with which history tasked us.

    We enveloped our President in 2001.And those who did not believe he should have been elected—indeed those who did not believe he had been elected—willingly lowered their voices and assented to the sacred oath of non-partisanship.

    And George W. Bush took our assent, and re-configured it, and honed it, and shaped it to a razor-sharp point and stabbed this nation in the back with it.

    Were there any remaining lingering doubt otherwise, or any remaining lingering hope, it ended yesterday when Mr. Bush commuted the prison sentence of one of his own staffers.

    Did so even before the appeals process was complete; did so without as much as a courtesy consultation with the Department of Justice; did so despite what James Madison—at the Constitutional Convention—said about impeaching any president who pardoned or sheltered those who had committed crimes “advised by” that president; did so without the slightest concern that even the most detached of citizens must look at the chain of events and wonder: To what degree was Mr. Libby told: break the law however you wish—the President will keep you out of prison?

    In that moment, Mr. Bush, you broke that fundamental com-pact between yourself and the majority of this nation’s citizens—the ones who did not cast votes for you. In that moment, Mr. Bush, you ceased to be the President of the United States. In that moment, Mr. Bush, you became merely the President of a rabid and irresponsible corner of the Republican Party. And this is too important a time, Sir, to have a commander-in-chief who puts party over nation.

    This has been, of course, the gathering legacy of this Administration. Few of its decisions have escaped the stain of politics. The extraordinary Karl Rove has spoken of “a permanent Republican majority,” as if such a thing—or a permanent Democratic majority—is not antithetical to that upon which rests: our country, our history, our revolution, our freedoms.

    Yet our Democracy has survived shrewder men than Karl Rove. And it has survived the frequent stain of politics upon the fabric of government. But this administration, with ever-increasing insistence and almost theocratic zealotry, has turned that stain into a massive oil spill.

    The protection of the environment is turned over to those of one political party, who will financially benefit from the rape of the environment. The protections of the Constitution are turned over to those of one political party, who believe those protections unnecessary and extravagant and quaint.

    The enforcement of the laws is turned over to those of one political party, who will swear beforehand that they will not enforce those laws. The choice between war and peace is turned over to those of one political party, who stand to gain vast wealth by ensuring that there is never peace, but only war.

    And now, when just one cooked book gets corrected by an honest auditor, when just one trampling of the inherent and inviolable fairness of government is rejected by an impartial judge, when just one wild-eyed partisan is stopped by the figure of blind justice, this President decides that he, and not the law, must prevail.

    I accuse you, Mr. Bush, of lying this country into war.

    I accuse you of fabricating in the minds of your own people, a false implied link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11.

    I accuse you of firing the generals who told you that the plans for Iraq were disastrously insufficient.

    I accuse you of causing in Iraq the needless deaths of 3,586 of our brothers and sons, and sisters and daughters, and friends and neighbors.

    I accuse you of subverting the Constitution, not in some misguided but sincerely-motivated struggle to combat terrorists, but to stifle dissent.

    I accuse you of fomenting fear among your own people, of creating the very terror you claim to have fought.

    I accuse you of exploiting that unreasoning fear, the natural fear of your own people who just want to live their lives in peace, as a political tool to slander your critics and libel your opponents.

    I accuse you of handing part of this Republic over to a Vice President who is without conscience, and letting him run roughshod over it.

    And I accuse you now, Mr. Bush, of giving, through that Vice President, carte blanche to Mr. Libby, to help defame Ambassador Joseph Wilson by any means necessary, to lie to Grand Juries and Special Counsel and before a court, in order to protect the mechanisms and particulars of that defamation, with your guarantee that Libby would never see prison, and, in so doing, as Ambassador Wilson himself phrased it here last night, of becoming an accessory to the obstruction of justice.

    When President Nixon ordered the firing of the Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox during the infamous “Saturday Night Massacre” on October 20th, 1973, Cox initially responded tersely, and ominously.

    “Whether ours shall be a government of laws and not of men, is now for Congress, and ultimately, the American people.”

    President Nixon did not understand how he had crystallized the issue of Watergate for the American people.

    It had been about the obscure meaning behind an attempt to break in to a rival party’s headquarters; and the labyrinthine effort to cover-up that break-in and the related crimes.

    And in one night, Nixon transformed it.

    Watergate—instantaneously—became a simpler issue: a President overruling the inexorable march of the law of insisting—in a way that resonated viscerally with millions who had not previously understood - that he was the law.

    Not the Constitution. Not the Congress. Not the Courts. Just him.

    Just - Mr. Bush - as you did, yesterday.

    The twists and turns of Plame-Gate, of your precise and intricate lies that sent us into this bottomless pit of Iraq; your lies upon the lies to discredit Joe Wilson; your lies upon the lies upon the lies to throw the sand at the “referee” of Prosecutor Fitzgerald’s analogy. These are complex and often painful to follow, and too much, perhaps, for the average citizen.

    But when other citizens render a verdict against your man, Mr. Bush—and then you spit in the faces of those jurors and that judge and the judges who were yet to hear the appeal—the average citizen understands that, Sir.

    It’s the fixed ballgame and the rigged casino and the pre-arranged lottery all rolled into one—and it stinks. And they know it.

    Nixon’s mistake, the last and most fatal of them, the firing of Archibald Cox, was enough to cost him the presidency. And in the end, even Richard Nixon could say he could not put this nation through an impeachment.

    It was far too late for it to matter then, but as the decades unfold, that single final gesture of non-partisanship, of acknowledged responsibility not to self, not to party, not to “base,” but to country, echoes loudly into history. Even Richard Nixon knew it was time to resign

    Would that you could say that, Mr. Bush. And that you could say it for Mr. Cheney. You both crossed the Rubicon yesterday. Which one of you chose the route, no longer matters. Which is the ventriloquist, and which the dummy, is irrelevant.

    But that you have twisted the machinery of government into nothing more than a tawdry machine of politics, is the only fact that remains relevant.

    It is nearly July 4th, Mr. Bush, the commemoration of the moment we Americans decided that rather than live under a King who made up the laws, or erased them, or ignored them—or commuted the sentences of those rightly convicted under them—we would force our independence, and regain our sacred freedoms.

    We of this time—and our leaders in Congress, of both parties—must now live up to those standards which echo through our history: Pressure, negotiate, impeach—get you, Mr. Bush, and Mr. Cheney, two men who are now perilous to our Democracy, away from its helm.

    For you, Mr. Bush, and for Mr. Cheney, there is a lesser task. You need merely achieve a very low threshold indeed. Display just that iota of patriotism which Richard Nixon showed, on August 9th, 1974.

    Resign.

    And give us someone—anyone—about whom all of us might yet be able to quote John Wayne, and say, “I didn’t vote for him, but he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job.”


    © 2007 MSNBC Interactive

    Link
    Eat Us And Smile

    Cenk For America 2024!!

    Justice Democrats


    "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992
  • FORD
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    • Jan 2004
    • 59948

    #2
    <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EmrcpDiv_ac"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EmrcpDiv_ac" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
    Eat Us And Smile

    Cenk For America 2024!!

    Justice Democrats


    "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

    Comment

    • Redballjets88
      Full Member Status

      • Mar 2005
      • 4469

      #3
      “I didn’t vote for him but he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job.”

      i fuckin love John Wayne
      R.I.P Van Halen 1978-1984

      hopefully God will ressurect you

      "i wont be messing with you in future.the fearsome redballjets88 for fear of you owning me some more" Axl S


      " I liked Sammy Hagar " FORD

      Comment

      • TongueNGroove
        Head Fluffer
        • Apr 2004
        • 499

        #4
        Why is he so pissed that the President did what he is legally allowed to do?

        A better question is, why is he not pissed at the person who actually caused all this trouble, Robert Novak Of the Chicago sun Times?

        Why? Cause he is a blind liberal. If gore had been elected and did the same thing he would be defending him. People like this guy make me sick. He says the president should not be partisan, meanwhile he is blindly Communist.


        Just more liberal hooplah about nothing.
        -We have enough youth. How about a fountain of "Smart"?

        -If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier.

        Comment

        • FORD
          ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

          • Jan 2004
          • 59948

          #5
          Originally posted by TongueNChimpy'sAss

          A better question is, why is he not pissed at the person who actually caused all this trouble, Robert Novak Of the Chicago sun Times?

          Why? Cause he is a blind liberal. If gore had been elected and did the same thing he would be defending him. People like this guy make me sick. He says the president should not be partisan, meanwhile he is blindly Communist.

          Robert Novak is a treasonous piece of shit as well, but he didn't pull that information out of his ass. Scooter is the one who told him.

          Gore WAS elected, but if his office had not been STOLEN, there would be no war, there would be no Cheney or Libby in the White House, and there would have been NO treason committed. Of course, you refuse to accept that because you are blindly fascist.
          Eat Us And Smile

          Cenk For America 2024!!

          Justice Democrats


          "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

          Comment

          • Nitro Express
            DIAMOND STATUS
            • Aug 2004
            • 32942

            #6
            I've seen it all with this administration. I'm waiting for George W. Bush to say,"I'm not part of the Executive Branch so I'm not obligated to undergo and investigation."
            No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

            Comment

            • Sgt Schultz
              Commando
              • Mar 2004
              • 1270

              #7
              Queef Überdumb

              Some questions and answers for

              Queef Überdumb

              1. Has the jury's verdict been overturned/changed.
              Answer - No

              2. Has the jury's prison sentence been overturned/changed.
              Answer - No (the jury didn't impose the prison sentence).

              3. Did the 42nd President of the U.S. pardon or commute any sentences?
              Answer - Yes, 185.
              Some of those pardons/commutations;
              + On August 11 1999, sentences commuted for of 16 members of FALN, a violent Puerto Rican nationalist group that set off 120 bombs in the United States convicted for conspiracies to commit robbery, bomb-making, and sedition, as well as for firearms and explosives violations. The FALN is responsible for 6 deaths and the permanent maiming of dozens of others, including law enforcement officials. The commutation was opposed by the U.S. Attorney's Office, the FBI, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons and criticized by many including former victims of FALN terrorist activities, the Fraternal Order of Police, members of Congress, and Hillary Clinton in her campaign for Senator. Congress condemned the action, with a vote of 95-2 in the Senate and 311-41 in the House.

              4. This is for FORD - have presidents ever pardoned people who were ACTUALLY involved in treason?
              -Yes - "George Washington pardoned the men who had taken part in the Whiskey Rebellion. Thomas Jefferson pardoned those convicted under the Alien and Sedition Acts. Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson granted amnesty to Confederate soldiers. Warren G. Harding pardoned prisoners held under World War I espionage laws. Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter pardoned Vietnam draft dodgers. "
              link

              And finally, Queef goes on about how NICE he and his ilk have been to Bush and then Bush goes and stabs them in the back. Please.

              Comment

              • Matt White
                • Jun 2004
                • 20569

                #8
                Olbermann is the funniest Cat on the tube.....


                and dead on the money
                Last edited by Matt White; 07-04-2007, 08:28 AM.

                Comment

                • ODShowtime
                  ROCKSTAR

                  • Jun 2004
                  • 5812

                  #9
                  Originally posted by TongueNGroove
                  Why is he so pissed that the President did what he is legally allowed to do?

                  Just more liberal hooplah about nothing.
                  Hey tongenass, how about you go fuck yourself you ignorant hick?

                  That article is dead on. If you don't understand the problem with libby it's because you're immoral or ignorant. Or both.

                  Liberal hooplah about nothing? It must be nice being completely blind to what's going on.
                  gnaw on it

                  Comment

                  • Redballjets88
                    Full Member Status

                    • Mar 2005
                    • 4469

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
                    Some questions and answers for

                    Queef Überdumb

                    1. Has the jury's verdict been overturned/changed.
                    Answer - No

                    2. Has the jury's prison sentence been overturned/changed.
                    Answer - No (the jury didn't impose the prison sentence).

                    3. Did the 42nd President of the U.S. pardon or commute any sentences?
                    Answer - Yes, 185.
                    Some of those pardons/commutations;
                    + On August 11 1999, sentences commuted for of 16 members of FALN, a violent Puerto Rican nationalist group that set off 120 bombs in the United States convicted for conspiracies to commit robbery, bomb-making, and sedition, as well as for firearms and explosives violations. The FALN is responsible for 6 deaths and the permanent maiming of dozens of others, including law enforcement officials. The commutation was opposed by the U.S. Attorney's Office, the FBI, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons and criticized by many including former victims of FALN terrorist activities, the Fraternal Order of Police, members of Congress, and Hillary Clinton in her campaign for Senator. Congress condemned the action, with a vote of 95-2 in the Senate and 311-41 in the House.

                    4. This is for FORD - have presidents ever pardoned people who were ACTUALLY involved in treason?
                    -Yes - "George Washington pardoned the men who had taken part in the Whiskey Rebellion. Thomas Jefferson pardoned those convicted under the Alien and Sedition Acts. Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson granted amnesty to Confederate soldiers. Warren G. Harding pardoned prisoners held under World War I espionage laws. Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter pardoned Vietnam draft dodgers. "
                    link

                    And finally, Queef goes on about how NICE he and his ilk have been to Bush and then Bush goes and stabs them in the back. Please.
                    i love when someone posts something like this because then you dont see ford in the thread ever again
                    R.I.P Van Halen 1978-1984

                    hopefully God will ressurect you

                    "i wont be messing with you in future.the fearsome redballjets88 for fear of you owning me some more" Axl S


                    " I liked Sammy Hagar " FORD

                    Comment

                    • DEMON CUNT
                      Crazy Ass Mofo
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 3242

                      #11
                      Re: Queef Überdumb

                      Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
                      1. Has the jury's verdict been overturned/changed.
                      Answer - No

                      2. Has the jury's prison sentence been overturned/changed.
                      Answer - No (the jury didn't impose the prison sentence).

                      3. Did the 42nd President of the U.S. pardon or commute any sentences?
                      Answer - Yes, 185.
                      Ha ha! I love it when you guys have to reference Clinton to justify the actions of your Führer.

                      I am sure that the administration appreciates all of the time you spend in defence of this legal maneuvering. After all, this treason trail leads right the desk of of the Vice-President of the United States.



                      The National Review? Maikin & Lowry? Shit, no wonder you are such a confused little fascist.
                      Last edited by DEMON CUNT; 07-04-2007, 01:43 PM.
                      Banned 01/09/09 | Avatar | Aiken | Spammy | Extreme | Pump | Regular | The View | Toot

                      Comment

                      • knuckleboner
                        Crazy Ass Mofo
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 2927

                        #12
                        Originally posted by FORD
                        Robert Novak is a treasonous piece of shit as well, but he didn't pull that information out of his ass. Scooter is the one who told him.

                        armitage told novak.

                        Comment

                        • TongueNGroove
                          Head Fluffer
                          • Apr 2004
                          • 499

                          #13
                          Yah Fraud, Armitage told Novak...get your facts straight before going on an impeachment tangent.
                          -We have enough youth. How about a fountain of "Smart"?

                          -If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier.

                          Comment

                          • jhale667
                            DIAMOND STATUS
                            • Aug 2004
                            • 20929

                            #14
                            Originally posted by TongueNGroove


                            Why? Cause he is a blind liberal.
                            That means so much coming from a blind neocon.
                            Originally posted by conmee
                            If anyone even thinks about deleting the Muff Thread they are banned.... no questions asked.

                            That is all.

                            Icon.
                            Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO
                            I've seen prominent hypocrite liberal on this site Jhale667


                            Originally posted by Isaac R.
                            Then it's really true??

                            The Muff Thread is really just GONE ???

                            OMFG...who in their right mind...???
                            Originally posted by eddie78
                            I was wrong about you, brother. You're good.

                            Comment

                            • stringfelowhawk
                              Foot Soldier
                              • Mar 2004
                              • 559

                              #15
                              I don't normally respond when I come across bickering in a thread no matter which side I silently agree with but this one just pisses me off because of the obvious lack of intelligent debating skills on behalf of this criminal administration. I'm gonna state my 2 pennies and move on so attacking me after the fact will not warrant another response. I just feel I need to set the record straight on a few things while handing you your ass. This whole "but Clinton" argument is about to fucking backfire so this is your only warning to duck and cover. I'm sure the same people who condone this administration are the same people who will attack me because of my "debating skills" comment above by claiming my opinion isn't so intelligent since I sprinkle a little profanity throughout and may mispell a word or miss a comma. So I'll say in advance, "way to change the subject now move on to the attempt to continue to apologize for these assholes without mentioning Bubba."

                              There are truly some stupid fucking people that defend these criminals. You have no argument with who leaked Plame's identity. That has never been the reason he was convicted therefore it is not the reason he was granted clemency. He was convicted of, (say it with me) PERJURY! You know, lying under oath? That used to be a crime before this theo-neo-fratboy criminal empire moved to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Well, actually it still is a crime for everyone that isn't a republican with very close ties to the throne. Don't you people realize this was more than just a presidents "right"? Don't you understand by this action he has essentially shielded himself and Cheney from any investigation into what role they played in leak. They have obstructed justice and have made sure that Libby can not testify about their role. After all the laws they have broken, do you still believe them to be honest? Scandal after scandal it has become obvious they do not have the best interests of the country in mind. They have yet to be held accountable for any of their actions and continue to ignore the laws of the land and the very document that our government was founded on. Those very laws and that document is the reason our country has prosperred and became what it was until the 2000 election.
                              I am so fucking disgusted with the whole Clinton invocation its literally giving me a migraine. You act as if anything and in fact everything he did while in office compares equally, yet it does not. There are scales with which to measure the differences but the most important one is the body count. If you want to argue Bush is justified because Clinton did something too then your entire point of view is weightless. I don't care much for him and "Black Hawk Down" is the biggest reason. Not because of the reason we were involved. His intentions were honorable and I have no qualm with the operation planning or execution. I lost a lot of respect for him because those Rangers and Green Berets lost their lives for the truly noble purpose of helping the people of Somalia get food and supplies yet pulled us out after that episode. You will no doubt try and twist that statement into hypocricy because of what's happening in Iraq now but you would be a fool nonetheless. We did not invade Somalia for its abundance of oil and revenge on its dictator. We in fact did not invade Somalia at all. Clinton did not start a war for profit under the false pretense of a threat to our national security by a rogue nation. He did not manipulate intel in order to build support for the invasion he knowingly and willingly knew was NOT connected to September 11th. That didn't stop him from claiming otherwise though. Even though it has now unanimously been proven to be false yet the Vice President still echoes that falsehood as fact. A war profiteer whose previous employer is the biggest corporation operating in Iraq after being given "no bid" contracts for work they have not done, for work they have overcharged, work they have performed so poorly that most has to be re-done all the while no matter how many times they are caught red handed cheating us taxpayers and the government they continue to get those same contracts. Anyone with the most basic of math skills can testify to the benefits of fucking up and paying a $50,000 fine while balancing it against a contract worth $7 billion. Even Spock would agree with that logic.
                              So, since you people like to invoke Clinton every time Bush and Cheney are exposed as a faux-patriots and criminals I'll take this second to remind you that after everything thing he did, was accused of, admitted to, and convicted of in the end Clinton was Impeached.
                              Therefore, he was held accountable for his actions which means every time you "but-Clinton" all you do is sink your own point of view and enforce ours because he may have been impeached for getting a blowjob and convicted of perjury but he was still held accountable. You can not say that about your benefactors. That is an enormous difference when you take into account the ever more serious and treasonous crimes this administration has committed.

                              Now post your addresses so I can overnight your ass back to you.

                              Arizona high school teacher Bill Greenberg -- visiting the White House with his students -- said: "I'm busy teaching my students all about the Constitution (and) wondering if we'll ever get anybody here who actually reads it."
                              Visit my online store http://www.tripleclicks.com/12395755 or get your own http://www.sfi4.com/12395755/FREE

                              Comment

                              Working...