Tweet
I can't even type about this without wanting to swear.
-
"If our country is worth dying for in time of war let us resolve that it is truly worth living for in time of peace." - Hamilton Fish -
Elly, who are you angry at?
BushCO or greenspan?
I already started a thread pointing out that most of the "benchmarks", and the reasons our soldiers are dying, is because the Iraqi "government" can't come up with oil laws that are acceptable to BushCO and his cronies in Big Oil.
THIS WHOLE WAR HAS BEEN ABOUT OIL FROM DAY ONE.
Why do you think Cheney's "energy task force" was so hush-hush???Originally posted by KristyOriginally posted by cadaverdog -
BushCo....and Greenspan
Greenspan I believe. Out of all the lies and deceit you really try to choose. You try to believe. You try to project your good-heartedness onto those that need to be that way.
Then this shit.
I'm very very angry over all this.
Why has Greenspan waited so long? Does that not make him an accessory to all of this?
See, I've got a friend who has been badgering me for weeks to go to DC with them yesterday. Telling me that it's my civic duty to stand against those who oppose the war. Pressuring me.
So, I chose not to go because of the latest Patraeus hearings.
Today, I'm angry that my friend has been fooled too.
George will go down as the worst President in history."If our country is worth dying for in time of war let us resolve that it is truly worth living for in time of peace." - Hamilton FishComment
-
Read both my Greenspan and Benchmark threads...
You have every right to be angered.
We've been duped into financing a take over of Iraqi Oil for US Big Oil Companies, spilling our blood and making more terrorists than ever before.
And by the way, ask your friend who these 34 countries are that he claimed Thursday night are fighting with us.
We're all alone, fighting for Exxon/Mobil et al......
God help us now....Originally posted by KristyOriginally posted by cadaverdogComment
-
** moderator's note **
Technically this is a multi-dupe on subject matter, however I think the real crux of the thread is not the book or oil, but rather Ell's sheer anger at being scammed by her own pResident, and his cronies.
So you go, girl.
Let 'em have it.
Originally posted by KristyOriginally posted by cadaverdogComment
-
Greenspan had no direct input or say regarding the Iraq War in his previous position...
And yes, Greenspan is one fucking smart cat. I almost had the pleasure of meeting him at a wedding --but alas, he was a no show...Comment
-
Originally posted by Ellyllions
Why has Greenspan waited so long? .
Ell, hun,, with all due respect..
WTF difference would it have made????
How many Richard Clarks have there been?
How many FIRED Generals have spoken out?
Would Alan speaking out earlier made ONE iota of difference in BushCO's agenda??
no.Originally posted by KristyOriginally posted by cadaverdogComment
-
dupeLast edited by LoungeMachine; 09-16-2007, 04:35 PM.Originally posted by KristyOriginally posted by cadaverdogComment
-
I try to be very careful with whom I believe. For the mere fact that they have a particular job to do. Generals for instance, have those stars on their shoulders that make them want to be historic. They want to be battle-hardened. They want to see combat.Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Ell, hun,, with all due respect..
WTF difference would it have made????
How many Richard Clarks have there been?
How many FIRED Generals have spoken out?
Would Alan speaking out earlier made ONE iota of difference in BushCO's agenda??
no.
Richard Clark was too close to the political playing field for me to take him seriously. Politicians have agendas.
Greenspan should've said something earlier. And the difference would've been people like me who were trying to make sense of it all. The division in this country wouldn't be as great.
Between those who have and those who have not, they've broken 2 countries. Iraq wasn't a shining beacon of anything in the middle east before, but now....look at it. And then look at US!
See the news on the clash in DC yesterday. Look how we're treating each other!"If our country is worth dying for in time of war let us resolve that it is truly worth living for in time of peace." - Hamilton FishComment
-
Originally posted by Ellyllions
See the news on the clash in DC yesterday. Look how we're treating each other!
Which is exactly what BushCO wanted
Make the argument about which faction cares about the troops more.....
Meanwhile Chimpy conducts his occupation.
Classic magician distraction.
MoveOn.org played right into it as well....
Shoot the messenger, let FAUX sort it out.
Originally posted by KristyOriginally posted by cadaverdogComment
-
Shit, RC was no politician...Originally posted by Ellyllions
Richard Clark was too close to the political playing field for me to take him seriously. Politicians have agendas.
He was an expert who worked for both parties.
Just how many people need to come forward telling the truth before the last 23% of this country WAKES THE FUCK UP??????????????????????????????????????????????Originally posted by KristyOriginally posted by cadaverdogComment
-
I have to say that I'm embarrassed.Comment
-
You and me both, babe.Originally posted by WAR
I have to say that I'm embarrassed.
You and me both."If our country is worth dying for in time of war let us resolve that it is truly worth living for in time of peace." - Hamilton FishComment
-
But then again, we shouldn't be embarassed.
We should be pissed.
We should be writing letters.
We should be making telephone calls.
We should be forcing change.
Because we can."If our country is worth dying for in time of war let us resolve that it is truly worth living for in time of peace." - Hamilton FishComment
Comment