9/11 - What do you think?

[ThrillsNSpills]

There's no way one person wouldn't of come forward by now, no way!

[Seshmeister]

An economist without a single grain of evidence or even an argument.

Nothing at all up to 5 minutes apart from waffle. Then its building 7 which is a nothing argument as shown earlier in this thread.

Then it's Kennedy. What's Kennedy got to do with it?

9 minutes of nothing. What a moron.

[Seshmeister]

It would be far more interesting if fat middle aged people who were caught up in 9-11 became immortal.

[Seshmeister]

BTW Jennings refuted the quotes about 'dead bodies' attributed to him. He said he never saw such a thing. The people with a motive to 'kill' him are actually the 'Loose Change' fraudsters.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:7HLMF4JXJPMJ:news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/conspiracy_files/7434230.stm+barry+jennings+death+debunked&cd=39&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

The real irony of this is that the so called truthers are the ones who constantly make shit up, twist evidence and bullshit.

[Unchainme]

So what exactly was the goal of the 9/11 attacks per the conspiracy theorists?

As I can recall prior to the whole attack, Bush was quite the mediocre president. Pretty much playing the part of Clinton pt. 2. Not bad, but not "Great". If the economy was good enough, he may have had a shot at winning the '04 election (minus the whole 9/11 boost he was still getting).

9/11 was his peak, and it went all down hill from there. He lost the respect of the world, and of the country within 2 years

[Unchainme]

I will say this is eerie.

[FORD]

[clarathecarrot]

Ok, One more time for those that didn't hear me the first 100, here how it go,... wrote a song about it...

It is so hard to find a group of retards in this world (insert keyboard tinkle)
of ours ( some bass here)
I'ts impossible in this together
world of ours
that would fly a plane into a building ( cut to hot chicks giggling, for the visually stimulated)
with the promise of instant death as thier reward ( more bass thumping).
and large groups of non-believers are going to be smashed into smitherines.

Short and sweet get Johnny Rotten and EMI on the line it's a smash hit sure to get the attention of the world.

I mean shit I'll hit you with a paintball gun round just to giggle about it...

[Nickdfresh]

We generally don't like to ban N'Tob's...

[FORD]

Short and sweet get Johnny Rotten and EMI on the line it's a smash hit sure to get the attention of the world.

[clarathecarrot]

Nice..Exactly That.^

The only bad thing about my, "theory" is it doesn't sell newspapers, books, media commercial times, news or movie deals...and sadly, that is because it is the truth.

[Tob]

No "earl grey" for you, but you may shine my shoes - if you know what you "mean"~

And keep with topic of this post, that is my suggestion, with you, "ashstralia" - also, your "name" appears a combination of "ash" and "Australia" your "world" experience, why have you put together such name?

"Nice" - "incorrect" - correct thine "error" and keep an eye on these shoes..

[Tob]

Perhaps, but the freak is correct about the FEMA publications from 1997........



FEMA also admitted to setting up an emergency operations center in NYC on the night of September 10th 2001.

FORD, you express yourself as "lame-brain" with "weak-mindedness" time after time, but I have loved, with truth, your energy, from the day of Halen's "Dome" to present. Thank you for your post with this picture and thanks with your commentary.

[Seshmeister]

It apparently hasn't occurred to any of these geniuses that in 1997 the only international terrorism that had been committed on US soil was the 1994 bombing at the World Trade Centre. The only other notable terrorism had been Oklahoma City and the Olympic Park the work of domestic lunatics.

It would have been a bit weird not to have a picture of the WTC at that time.

Anyway as stated earlier, so fuck?

[Tob]

Responsible Cable News Outlets To Devote Sensible Amount Of Airtime To 10th Anniversary Of 9/11

September 5, 2011 | ISSUE 47•36


NEW YORK—Promising to cover the event responsibly and with the kind of delicate restraint it deserves, the nation's cable news outlets announced Monday that while they would be devoting some airtime to the 10th anniversary of 9/11, they "certainly wouldn't be going overboard with it."

The major networks confirmed their coverage would "of course" be tasteful and brief.

According to the news providers, they only intend to devote 15 minutes of coverage to the anniversary, tops, saying it is their obligation as professional journalists to do justice to the victims' memories as opposed to using the occasion for their own ratings gain.

In addition, network representatives admitted it would be lazy news reporting to use the 10th anniversary of the terrorist attacks as an excuse to fill up hundreds of hours of programming with repetitive video packages and anchors repeatedly asking their guests, "How did 9/11 change America?"

"We're planning to send one reporter to Ground Zero, have him tape a couple of two-minute segments, nothing too crazy, and that should pretty much do it," said CNN's senior vice president of programming Katherine Green, adding that the 24-hour news channel would not be making 9/11 the focus of every single program on the network because, according to Green, "What more is there to say, really?" "We'll also briefly check in with Anderson Cooper at the Pentagon, and that will be the only time we hear from him during the entirety of our coverage."

"Then our plan is to do what other American cable news providers presumably will be doing," she added. "We'll go back to reporting that never panders to viewers, but instead challenges them and forces them to step outside their own bubble by making them aware of all the truly newsworthy events happening in the world."

Along with Green, representatives from MSNBC, CNBC, HLN, and Fox News immediately ruled out doing an entire week of pre-anniversary coverage, calling it a waste of time, resources, and potentially exploitative to family members who lost a loved one on 9/11.

The networks also said they would not be designing an "America Remembers" graphic to be constantly plastered across the bottom third of the television screen; wouldn't even think about conducting "trite, unoriginal, and what basically amounts to filler" man-on-the-street interviews that ask citizens where they were on 9/11; and, calling it "sensationalism just for the sake of sensationalism," wouldn't repeatedly show archived footage of airplanes colliding into the Twin Towers and New Yorkers running away from the collapsed buildings.

Sources at Fox News confirmed that at no time during their coverage would they use the anniversary as an excuse to paint the Obama administration as weak on terrorism.

"I would imagine some might think that because it's the 10th anniversary, we would latch on to the whole '10th' aspect and blow it completely out of proportion," MSNBC national news director Derrick Lipton said. "But we're smarter than that. Our viewers are smarter than that. If anything, we'll maybe cut back to Ground Zero when Presidents Obama and Bush leave the memorial service. And then maybe we'll have Tom Brokaw on to talk about what it was like covering the event 10 years ago. If we do that, we'll probably do commercial bumpers where we show images of the two beams of blue light shining up into the night sky, footage of Bush with his bullhorn saying, "Well, I can hear you," and maybe something that represents the human side of the tragedy, like people tacking up pictures of their loved ones. That's it. But then I suppose we could also have [former mayor Rudy] Giuliani on because, well, I don't know why. He won't say anything he hasn't said before, but it just feels like we should have him on, especially if Fox has him on. We could probably fill a bunch of time with the whole anthrax thing that came afterward, maybe do an entire terrorism retrospective that would look big and flashy but add no new information whatsoever, and just rerun that over and over and over again. Maybe throw in some of that mosque stuff. And then, oh, this would be perfect, we do profiles on the families who lost their loved ones on the Pennsylvania plane. We'll act as if we're shining a light on something that's been ignored, but really it hasn't been ignored, because over the past 10 years there have been 4,000 similar segments done about the circumstances surrounding that flight."

"But that's not what we're all about," he added. "We're better than that."

Link

FORD has POSTED one other "spin" - thank you. We read such "news" groups have not taken responsibility for their action expressed. "Fox News" expresses itself as "U.S." energy, "bull-shit" - why "identify" with "U.S." force? This is the United States of America.