Bush Admin/Neocons Ignored Continued Warnings of 9/11 Attacks

[Nickdfresh]

That's either total bullshit or you know absolutely zero about 9/11...

Says the intellectually lazy, incompetent spoon-fed conspiracy retard who never even actually read the "Official Report" to begin with...

[Nickdfresh]

The 11th Anniversary of 9/11 ~ Paul Craig Roberts
September 11, 2012

....

So I post an article highly critical of the Bush Admin possibly showing they were almost criminally negligent, and you have to post complete bullshit conspiracy tripe basically ass-covering for the Bush Admin by marginalizing his critics making them seem like all conspiracy'tards....

[clarathecarrot]

Actually, one was struck by a missile, the other a fake airliner because they have that one on tape. Only if it hadn't been taped would it have been a missile. But since it was taped, it was a fake airliner with a remote control unit on it. The real airliners that disappeared were landed in Cleveland and all the people were massacred by black-clad ninjas in the military. It's all very plausible if you think about it. Flight 93 was different however, it was redirected by its unwitting crew and shot down by USAF fighters, for some reason, they weren't able to get that one to Cleveland so they could massacre all of the passengers, silly!

Who directed the scene Senore' Spielbergo ?

I realize you post shit like this to keep the ever climbing, number of posts, records going for your personal, The Front.

In hopes of just,.... anyone will talk to you..but I believe you are becoming brain washed by the same assholes you bitch and moan about.

So kindly fuck off with this shit and act like a moderator.

[DONNIEP]

So Mulder's buddies predicted 9/11 except that there weren't actually any planes involved, or there were but they weren't real planes, or the planes were real but they were giant UAVs, but the fuel onboard didn't actually burn hot enough on impact to bring the towers down and explosives were used to drop the towers. And none of the people who actually worked in the towers heard anything. I'm confused

Seriously, I don't have a dog in this fight and I enjoy reading both sides' interpretation of the events.

[FORD]

Actually, one was struck by a missile, the other a fake airliner because they have that one on tape. Only if it hadn't been taped would it have been a missile. But since it was taped, it was a fake airliner with a remote control unit on it. The real airliners that disappeared were landed in Cleveland and all the people were massacred by black-clad ninjas in the military. It's all very plausible if you think about it. Flight 93 was different however, it was redirected by its unwitting crew and shot down by USAF fighters, for some reason, they weren't able to get that one to Cleveland so they could massacre all of the passengers, silly!

Actually, Flight 93 was the one that DID land in Cleveland, as reported by a local TV station...

Plane Lands In Cleveland – Bomb Feared Aboard
8-7-4

Reported by 9News Staff
Web produced by:Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM

A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.

White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.

United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did not say how many people were aboard the flight.

United said it was also “deeply concerned” about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.

On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: “The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved.

“United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights,” he said.

[Nickdfresh]

Who directed the scene Senore' Spielbergo ?

I realize you post shit like this to keep the ever climbing, number of posts, records going for your personal, The Front.

In hopes of just,.... anyone will talk to you..but I believe you are becoming brain washed by the same assholes you bitch and moan about.

So kindly fuck off with this shit and act like a moderator.

Eat my asshole, inbred retard...

[Nickdfresh]

Actually, Flight 93 was the one that DID land in Cleveland, as reported by a local TV station...

It was recanted and later corrected amongst the days mass confusion, I recall a carbomb also went off at the State Dept. which turned out to be bullshit...

Here: http://www.911myths.com/html/93_land...cleveland.html

Liz Foreman, whose name was attached to this story, tried to clear it up in February 2006.

I thought it was time to set the record straight on a website error that's gotten out of hand.

I've been getting calls and e-mails for several years, all from folks who have seen my byline on a story (Plane Lands In Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard) about Flight 93, the plane that crashed in a Pennsylvania field on September 11, 2001.

The story in question, an Associated Press bulletin, was posted on WCPO.com during the morning of September 11, 2001. The story stated that Flight 93 landed in Cleveland. This was not true.

Once the AP issued a retraction a few minutes later, we removed the link.

There were two problems:

1)I only removed the link TO the story. We did not remove the story itself. This was my error probably due to the busy nature of the day - I was the only person updating the website until about noon that day, and things were crazier than they’d ever been.

2) The byline was incorrect. In my haste, I pasted the “Reported by: 9News Staff” byline from a previous story, but this was actually an Associated Press story.

Sometime in 2003 I received an e-mail inquiring about the story. I quickly removed the story, and wrote back to the person, thanking them for the heads up about the incorrect story.

Things didn't stop there.

Messages and phone calls started coming in about "Why did the government make me remove the story?" As is the nature of the net, folks had gotten a hold of the old story and posted it on their own blogs, fueling even more interest in the situation.

So, for everyone who is still wondering about this story, here are some frequently asked questions. I'm hoping this clears everything up once and for all!


FAQ

1. Where did the original story come from?
The story was an Associated Press bulletin that came across the news wires. Associated Press is a news service that many news organizations subscribe to for non-local news. The idea is that a local news organization can’t possibly have reporters everywhere in the world, so for that reason, we publish stories written by Associated Press journalists.

2. So you didn’t report the story yourself?
No, I work at the website in Cincinnati. I generally do not do any reporting out in the field. Also, I was not in Cleveland, nor does WCPO-TV have a Cleveland-based reporter. If you’re not familiar with the geography of Ohio, Cleveland is a good four hours away from us.

There were two problems:

1) I only removed the link TO the story. We did not remove the story itself. This was my error probably due to the busy nature of the day - I was the only person updating the website until about noon that day, and things were crazier than they’d ever been.

2) The byline was incorrect. In my haste, I pasted the “Reported by: 9News Staff” byline from a previous story, but this was actually an Associated Press story.

3. Why didn’t you remove the problem story page from the outset?
My mistake, that’s why. I removed the link TO the story, but didn’t remove the actual story. Then, the story page was indexed by the major search engines. I didn’t even know the story hadn’t been removed until after I was contacted by a member of the public.

4. Why DID you remove the page?
Because it was in error.

5. Why did you create this FAQ page? Isn’t that just fueling the fire?
I’ve been getting a ton of phone calls and e-mails about this recently and answering everyone would make it hard for me to get my day job – running the website – accomplished. Also, unlike the old media paradigm, which is “ignore it and it’ll go away,” the Internet means a two-way conversation with our website users. So, in the interest of media transparency, this is my attempt to clear the air.
http://blogs.scripps.com/wcpo/staff/..._93_story.html

[clarathecarrot]

Yeap,!!! you guys are correct, there are no such things as airplanes, they don't take off of the ground and fly around at millions of different declinations, all over the world, by the millions, of individual planes and pilots, and land by the millions, from all different angles and directions all the time every day, it is just impossible...

*( everyone agree with me I think the moderators of this site are off the deep end and a danger to themselves)*

[clarathecarrot]

Eat my asshole, inbred retard...

You are a strange little man...buddy.

[Nickdfresh]

You are a strange little man...buddy.

I'm strange? Probably. But then I don't run around to every thread mentioning gays and complaining how much you hate them and their lifestyle, then you admit you don't date women because you can't get any and you hate them as a result....

So shut the fuck up, the adults are talking!

[ELVIS]

Says the intellectually lazy, incompetent spoon-fed conspiracy retard who never even actually read the "Official Report" to begin with...

No, that's you...

[motherchicken]

I wonder if CVH has any normal fans? Fans that don't spend hours and hours every night spewing conspiracy theories about this or that or refering to people who lean the other way politically as morons and retards. I've seen CVH twice and Van Hagar once and no one before during or after brought up such subjects. I say ban political talk (and religion while your at it) at The Roth Army. I wonder what Dave would think if he read this shit. Probably make Sarge remove his name.

[gbranton]

Can we roll into this thread about how Obama admin/Neolibs ignored continued warnings over the prior seven days about the 9/11 anniversary embassy attacks, or do we start a different thread about that?

[Nickdfresh]

Start whatever thread you want, gb...

[Hardrock69]

Posted in the wrong thread. Please delete this.