The Gun Control Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PETE'S BROTHER
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Feb 2007
    • 12678

    Originally posted by lesfunk
    What does a Kiwi footballer have to do with this?
    pants off!
    Another one of those classic genius posts, sure to generate responses. You log on the next day to see what your witty gem has produced to find no one gets it and 2 knotheads want to stick their dicks in it... Well played, sir!!

    Comment

    • lesfunk
      Full Member Status

      • Jan 2004
      • 3583

      How rude
      http://gifsoup.com/imager.php?id=4448212&t=o GIFSoup

      Comment

      • Nickdfresh
        SUPER MODERATOR

        • Oct 2004
        • 49563

        How NRA Propagandists & Their GOP Shills Try To Control Information & Stifle Debate

        January 17, 2013 7:36 PM

        NRA, Congress stymied CDC gun research budget
        <embed src="http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/cbsnews_player_embed.swf" scale="noscale" salign="lt" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" background="#333333" width="425" height="279" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" FlashVars="si=254&&contentValue=50139200&shareUrl= http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57564599/nra-congress-stymied-cdc-gun-research-budget/" />

        (CBS News) On Monday, President Obama ordered the Centers for Disease Control to begin research on the causes of gun violence. That was something that Congress specifically prevented the CDC from doing.

        "There is absolutely no question. These are preventable deaths," said Dr. Mark Rosenberg, who used to oversee research into gun violence and prevention at the Centers for Disease Control.

        In 1996, the NRA successfully lobbied Congress to put this restriction into the CDC's budget: "None of the funds made available ... may be used to advocate or promote gun control."

        "These were shots fired across the bow," said Rosenberg, "and they the terrorized people at the CDC. And they terrorized researchers who said, 'Whoa, this is scary. I don't want my funding jeopardized.'"

        9 in 10 back universal gun background checks
        NRA president: Gun control measures "feel-good proposals that won't work"
        NRA: We didn't get a chance to oppose N.Y. law
        Poll: 6 in 10 favor tougher gun laws

        The NRA was infuriated with a 1993 study sponsored by the CDC that concluded having a gun at home offered little protection, but it increased almost three-fold the risk of one family member shooting another.

        CDC funding into gun violence research has plummeted 96 percent since 1996, to just $100,000 of last year's $5.6 billion CDC budget.

        Asked if gun violence a legitimate public health issue Bob Barr, a former Georgia congressman who sits on the board of the NRA, responded, "Absolutely not."

        Barr added: "The issue of firearms violence is handled and ought to be handled as a law enforcement matter. We don't need government involved in this. It is all about the big C: control."

        The next step is up to Congress whether to approve President Obama's request for $10 million to study this issue of gun violence.
        © 2013 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
        Last edited by Nickdfresh; 01-18-2013, 04:24 PM.

        Comment

        • Nickdfresh
          SUPER MODERATOR

          • Oct 2004
          • 49563

          Originally posted by lesfunk
          That seems to be based on a pretty big assumption that people who own these kinds of weapons are all "bad" types.
          Your comment is a pretty big "assumption", or rather a strawman one.

          However, when a "Bushmaster" is repeatedly tied to massacres and murders, there might be a pattern developing. As in three major recent shootings and of course the magically appearing one used by the D.C. cunt-Sniper..

          Of course not , but are we trying to enact real meaningful change or only curb crime stemming from one specific weapon?
          It's so obviously a Political move. do you not see that?
          No, an entire class of weapons based on crimes since WWII. The NRA has just managed to minimize and deflect debate preventing a meaningful "curbing" of crime...

          something can be done, but there are millions of these fucking rifles out there yet they are hardly ever used in the commission of a crime.
          We need to focus on issues instead of scapegoating on specific weapon and the people who legally own them.
          That's fine, then the honest, hardworking, law-abiding owners can register them...

          Comment

          • Nickdfresh
            SUPER MODERATOR

            • Oct 2004
            • 49563

            Originally posted by lesfunk
            What does a Kiwi footballer have to do with this?
            Ian V.

            Comment

            • Nickdfresh
              SUPER MODERATOR

              • Oct 2004
              • 49563

              Originally posted by Kristy
              But you do have to instruct WARF on how to snowball you.
              Is that whore-vernacular?

              Comment

              • Kristy
                DIAMOND STATUS
                • Aug 2004
                • 16721

                Poor Nick - can't find a suitable reply from Wiki?

                Comment

                • lesfunk
                  Full Member Status

                  • Jan 2004
                  • 3583

                  No, an entire class of weapons based on crimes since WWII. The NRA has just managed to minimize and deflect debate preventing a meaningful "curbing" of crime...
                  No, not an entire class, Different brands, all making essentially the same rifle (AR-15) I couldn't get a real machine gun even if I wanted to and I can't even get an AR without at least a Pistol permit to show that I have had some training.
                  You should have to earn a certificate to be allowed to operate one of these things. You should have stringent background checks before you can own one. You should have a waiting period before you can take delivery. These should be universal.
                  As far as the NRA goes, they are a political group. It's their job to be unreasonable assholes; hence the term "political"

                  That's fine, then the honest, hardworking, law-abiding owners can register them...
                  There you go again, a subtle insinuation that the "honest, hard working, law abiding owners" would not abide by the law.
                  http://gifsoup.com/imager.php?id=4448212&t=o GIFSoup

                  Comment

                  • Nickdfresh
                    SUPER MODERATOR

                    • Oct 2004
                    • 49563

                    Originally posted by Kristy
                    Poor Nick - can't find a suitable reply from Wiki?
                    Oh look, unintentional irony! You take it, but you sure can't dish it out...

                    Comment

                    • Nickdfresh
                      SUPER MODERATOR

                      • Oct 2004
                      • 49563

                      Originally posted by lesfunk
                      No, not an entire class, Different brands, all making essentially the same rifle (AR-15) I couldn't get a real machine gun even if I wanted to and I can't even get an AR without at least a Pistol permit to show that I have had some training.
                      Good!

                      You should have to earn a certificate to be allowed to operate one of these things. You should have stringent background checks before you can own one. You should have a waiting period before you can take delivery. These should be universal.
                      As far as the NRA goes, they are a political group. It's their job to be unreasonable assholes; hence the term "political"
                      The NRA started out as a sportsmens' club concerned mainly with training and safety. They only transitioned to Babylonian whores in the 70's I think...

                      There you go again, a subtle insinuation that the "honest, hard working, law abiding owners" would not abide by the law.
                      You're interpretation is not my subtle insinuation. If they're law abiding owners, wouldn't that necessitate they follow a law?

                      Comment

                      • FORD
                        ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                        • Jan 2004
                        • 59552

                        The biggest misconception about the NRA by the right wing is the belief that they represent the best interests of gun owners.

                        They do not. They represent gun manufacturers. Wayne LaPierre doesn't really give a shit if the "Kenyan socialist Muslim" takes your guns... as long as you buy more guns to replace them.
                        Eat Us And Smile

                        Cenk For America 2024!!

                        Justice Democrats


                        "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                        Comment

                        • lesfunk
                          Full Member Status

                          • Jan 2004
                          • 3583

                          Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                          Good!
                          OK. so what's the problem?


                          The NRA started out as a sportsmens' club concerned mainly with training and safety. They only transitioned to Babylonian whores in the 70's I think...
                          Indeed. and our armed forces started out as a means of protecting our nation from outside aggression and now look at where we are. Imperial World Police



                          You're interpretation is not my subtle insinuation. If they're law abiding owners, wouldn't that necessitate they follow a law?
                          Of course, again, further restriction of the "good guys" does nothing about the "bad guys"
                          http://gifsoup.com/imager.php?id=4448212&t=o GIFSoup

                          Comment

                          • Nickdfresh
                            SUPER MODERATOR

                            • Oct 2004
                            • 49563

                            Originally posted by lesfunk
                            OK. so what's the problem?
                            That that isn't the case in every state. Virgina, you just need a driver's license and you can walk out with an armory...

                            Indeed. and our armed forces started out as a means of protecting our nation from outside aggression and now look at where we are. Imperial World Police

                            Of course, again, further restriction of the "good guys" does nothing about the "bad guys"
                            Um, bad guys use strawpurchasers, then the NRA and their Republican fuckwits attack the ATF to effectively prevent them from actually "enforcing the laws on the books" and promote politics over public safety....

                            Comment

                            • lesfunk
                              Full Member Status

                              • Jan 2004
                              • 3583

                              Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                              That that isn't the case in every state. Virgina, you just need a driver's license and you can walk out with an armory...
                              That's obviously wrong. Common sense tells you that but It does make living in VA sound more fun.

                              Um, bad guys use strawpurchasers, then the NRA and their Republican fuckwits attack the ATF to effectively prevent them from actually "enforcing the laws on the books" and promote politics over public safety....
                              How many weapons can a straw purchaser purchase at a time and from where do they purchase them?
                              It seems like it would be pretty easy to detect an individual buying tons of iron. The background checks should catch that
                              Last edited by lesfunk; 01-18-2013, 05:59 PM.
                              http://gifsoup.com/imager.php?id=4448212&t=o GIFSoup

                              Comment

                              • Kristy
                                DIAMOND STATUS
                                • Aug 2004
                                • 16721

                                Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                                Oh look, unintentional irony! You take it, but you sure can't dish it out...
                                You're right. I cannot handle your disappointment.

                                Comment

                                Working...