The Gun Control Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jhale667
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Aug 2004
    • 20929

    10 bucks says ELBOW's already damaged his knee cartilage spanking it to that picture...
    Originally posted by conmee
    If anyone even thinks about deleting the Muff Thread they are banned.... no questions asked.

    That is all.

    Icon.
    Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO
    I've seen prominent hypocrite liberal on this site Jhale667


    Originally posted by Isaac R.
    Then it's really true??

    The Muff Thread is really just GONE ???

    OMFG...who in their right mind...???
    Originally posted by eddie78
    I was wrong about you, brother. You're good.

    Comment

    • ELVIS
      Banned
      • Dec 2003
      • 44120

      Is that what happens to you ??

      Comment

      • Kristy
        DIAMOND STATUS
        • Aug 2004
        • 16721

        Originally posted by Nickdfresh
        Fun, but inaccurate...
        Wiki is always accurate.

        Right, Nick?

        Comment

        • ELVIS
          Banned
          • Dec 2003
          • 44120

          Larry Pratt Slams Piers Morgan Over “Sham” Gun Control Argument

          CNN host is still ludicrously claiming that gun control made England safe, when it is the most violent country in Europe

          Paul Joseph Watson

          Gun Owners of America head Larry Pratt re-appeared on CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight and proceeded to school Morgan on his ridiculous argument that England, a country with the highest violent crime rate in Europe, was made safe by gun control.



          Pratt savaged Morgan’s contention that gun control reduces violent crime and murders, labeling the CNN host’s position a “sham”.

          Morgan’s argument that England, a country with a higher violent crime rate than even poverty-stricken South Africa, was made safe by gun control, is patently ludicrous and can be debunked in all manner of different ways.

          For a start, Morgan’s claim of only 39 gun murders in England and Wales in 2011 has to be balanced against the fact that top police bodies in England have repeatedly warned that crime figures are being manipulated to reduce the number of recorded crimes and that, “the recorded crime level bore no resemblance to the actual amount of crime being committed.”

          A 2000 report from the Inspectorate of Constabulary found that the way England records homicides is completely inaccurate in comparison with the American method and that, “With such differences in reporting criteria, comparisons of U.S. homicide rates with British homicide rates is a sham.”
          As the Telegraph reported, “the true level of gun crime” (in England) is (still) far higher than the Government admits in official statistics.”



          Source: EU Commission, UN

          Crucially, the number of violent crimes in England per person compared to America is significantly higher. England is a far more violent place than America, despite having a total gun ban.
          Figures from the EU Commission and the UN show that the number of violent crimes per 100,000 residents in England is around 2,000 compared to just 466 in America. For all Piers Morgan’s claims about the proliferation of guns leading to an increase in violence, it’s four times safer to live in American than England and according to the latest FBI statistics, America’s violent crime rate continues to fall.



          Source: FBI

          In addition, you are more than twice as likely to be a victim of knife crime in the UK than you are a victim of gun crime in the United States, but there is no media debate about banning kitchen knives.

          Despite virtually all handguns being outlawed in 1996 following the Dunblane school massacre in Scotland, with law-abiding people rushing to turn in their firearms, over the next decade gun crime in the UK more than doubled.

          England is routinely either number one or number two in the rankings of the highest violent crime rate in Europe. Switzerland on the other hand, with its almost universal gun ownership, is routinely ranked as one of the safest countries in Europe, again proving that gun control does not reduce violent crime.
          Gun control has never reduced violent crime in Britain, nor has it reduced gun crime. Last year, gun crime in England and Wales soared by 35 per cent. England’s gun murder rate did not drop after all handguns were banned in 1996.

          While England’s violent crime rate continues to accelerate, America’s violent crime rate drops as more and more law-abiding people own firearms.



          Source: TownHall.com

          As Katie Pavlich documents, “the notoriously violent city of Washington D.C. just saw its murder rate fall below triple digits for the first time since 1963 and just four years after the Supreme Court overturned the city’s handgun ban in District of Columbia v. Heller.”

          Figures from the US Department of Justice also highlight the fact that over the last 40 years, the amount of guns in America per 1000 people has increased, whereas serious violent crimes have decreased.



          Source: US Justice Department

          Meanwhile, in gun control “havens” like Chicago, banning firearms has only emboldened criminals and caused violent crime to rise. Since the handgun ban took effect, the number of murders in Chicago committed using handguns has been 40% higher than before the ban, and has spiked even higher in recent years, proving that the gun ban actually served to cause an increase in violent crime.



          Source: JustFacts.com

          “Does anyone actually believe that Piers Morgan is oblivious to the fact that the statistics he has been citing relentlessly in recent weeks are a notoriously unreliable “sham”?”

          These figures completely decimate Piers Morgan’s argument that gun control creates a safer, less violent society.

          His primary example in making that argument – England – has one of the most draconian gun control ban policies in the world, yet is also routinely in the top two of the most violent countries in the developed world – and is a significantly more violent place to live than America – which is probably one of the reasons why Piers left in the first place.






          Comment

          • BigBadBrian
            TOASTMASTER GENERAL
            • Jan 2004
            • 10625

            Originally posted by Kristy
            Wiki is always accurate.

            Right, Nick?
            Not always, but usually.

            Get off his dick for using wiki. It can be a good place as long as it has references to back whatever one is looking up.

            Is that all you have to add to this thread?

            What are your ideas on gun control, or can you formulate an original thought?
            “If bullshit was currency, Joe Biden would be a billionaire.” - George W. Bush

            Comment

            • Seshmeister
              ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

              • Oct 2003
              • 35748

              Originally posted by ELVIS
              His primary example in making that argument – England – has one of the most draconian gun control ban policies in the world, yet is also routinely in the top two of the most violent countries in the developed world – and is a significantly more violent place to live than America – which is probably one of the reasons why Piers left in the first place.
              Was that the argument he made? I dunno I can't bear to watch the fuck but I thought the argument was that if you don't have legal guns then a lot less people get killed. England is violent, not least because it has a high population density but when violence happens people are a lot less killy than in the US.

              I also think some of those statistics comparing countries are a bit apples and oranges and probably largely due to data gathering.

              Plus I always disregard arguments that compare places to Japan, Switzerland or Norway because they are just weird places.
              Last edited by Seshmeister; 01-10-2013, 01:17 PM.

              Comment

              • Seshmeister
                ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                • Oct 2003
                • 35748

                Originally posted by BigBadBrian
                Not always, but usually.

                Get off his dick for using wiki. It can be a good place as long as it has references to back whatever one is looking up.
                Correct!

                Comment

                • ELVIS
                  Banned
                  • Dec 2003
                  • 44120

                  Originally posted by Seshmeister
                  I also think some of those statistics comparing countries are a bit apples and oranges and probably largely due to data gathering.
                  I totally agree with that, but you really should watch the clip...

                  Comment

                  • Nickdfresh
                    SUPER MODERATOR

                    • Oct 2004
                    • 49563

                    Originally posted by Kristy
                    Wiki is always accurate.

                    Right, Nick?
                    I dunno. What does it say about you wanting my penis?

                    Comment

                    • Nickdfresh
                      SUPER MODERATOR

                      • Oct 2004
                      • 49563

                      Originally posted by Seshmeister
                      ...

                      Plus I always disregard arguments that compare places to Japan, Switzerland or Norway because they are just weird places.
                      Especially when places like Switzerland are mentioned as red herrings solely because of the fact that they have a large number of "assault rifles" ISSUE BY THE GOV"T to the general population as most military aged men are in the Army reserve and the gov't obviously keeps close track of such weapons. Perhaps that's what was truly meant by the Second Amendment?

                      Comment

                      • BigBadBrian
                        TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 10625

                        Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                        Perhaps that's what was truly meant by the Second Amendment?
                        Nope.
                        “If bullshit was currency, Joe Biden would be a billionaire.” - George W. Bush

                        Comment

                        • BigBadBrian
                          TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 10625

                          "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

                          There it is. Break it down and define it.
                          “If bullshit was currency, Joe Biden would be a billionaire.” - George W. Bush

                          Comment

                          • LoungeMachine
                            DIAMOND STATUS
                            • Jul 2004
                            • 32576

                            Can't we all agree when this was [poorly] written they were firing muskets and couldn't possibly have known what would be considered "arms" in 200 years?

                            Also you guys always gloss over the "well REGULATED militia" part.

                            Originally posted by Kristy
                            Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
                            Originally posted by cadaverdog
                            I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

                            Comment

                            • BigBadBrian
                              TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                              • Jan 2004
                              • 10625

                              .....
                              “If bullshit was currency, Joe Biden would be a billionaire.” - George W. Bush

                              Comment

                              • ELVIS
                                Banned
                                • Dec 2003
                                • 44120

                                Originally posted by LoungeMachine

                                Also you guys always gloss over the "well REGULATED militia" part.


                                What does well regulated mean in your opinion ??

                                Also, the "militia part" is separate from the citizens right to keep and bear arms...

                                Comment

                                Working...