Teabaggers Roots go back to Dallas, 1963

[Satan]

Also this FBI memo, from the office of J. Edna Hoover herself, specifically mentions "Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency".......

[Nickdfresh]

To the contrary, the boats used in the Bay of Pigs CIA operation were named the "Houston", the "Zapata" and the "Barbara J".

Houston was Poppy's alleged hometown, and base of his cover, Zapata petroleum. And Barbara J. Crowley Pierce Bush..... well we all know who that is.

Poppy supervised the Bay of Pigs, and he supervised Dallas. Unfortunately, only one of those operations was a failure.

Yeah, um, but...

Even though a lot of the Anti-Castro activity was started under Ike, JFK approved the Bay of Pigs operation...

[Kristy]

The Carcanos were not very good military rifles overall, as not much the Italian military had in WWII could be called "good." But it's all relative. Firstly, a rifle can only be accurate if sited in properly by the shooter. You can plink at shit all day, but If the rifle wasn't sited into your own eyes and zeroed properly, you won't hit shit with them regardless of their accuracy. The Carcanos were not great, but that's compared to the other service rifles at the time like the German Mauser, the American M-1 Garand/Springfield, and the excellent Lee Enfield. That doesn't mean a properly used weapon wasn't more than serviceable enough, they killed more than a few Commonwealth and U.S. soldiers in WWII. Secondly, Oswald's shot wasn't particularly hard nor at long range and the shot and Oswald's purported actions were replicated by an Australian mercenary working with a Discovery Channel crew and showed to be far more plausible than the silly second shooter/Corsican Mafia, etc. conspiracy shit. I believe the weapon he used did jam in one of the simulations, but otherwise he had little trouble obliterating the JFK melon driving in the same distance and angle as JFK was from Oswald with multiple shots...

Couldn't help yourself, could you? For one, have you ever fired this weapon? I have. It's a pile of shit for a mass production rifle. The movable mechanisms were unreliable for battle and two, the half-ass Italian manufacturing sub-par; shit stock, sloppy bolt action, crappy machine boring. So let me tell you what that means: a inaccurate rifle as a whole; firing a rifle with accurate results is much more than just simple siting of a target. I've fired Mausers, too also a mass-production weapon built in several places throughout Europe (the Czech ones being the most solid) but unlike this piece of shit, it was designed with combat environments in mind. My uncle owned several that he built from "pickle barrel" parts and they fired with greater accuracy with little forethought as if one was in battle where his life deepened upon his weapon. I have no doubt a Carcano ended up costing the life of the one handling it than using it. Total pile of shit.

Any weapon will kill if used for its sole intended purpose - even a Carcano and quite possibly a Carcano 38 put a bullet in Kennedy's skull but it would take far more than luck to do it again with a second bullet that quick. Sloppy, sloppy bolt action even for a new one.

[Kristy]

Listen @1:47

Carcano is a piece of shit.

[Satan]

Here's irony for you...... just flipping through the channels on HellCable.... stumbled across the trash TV show "Access Hollywood" and they were talking about the JFK murder. And of course, they were pushing the Oswald fiction.

Why is this ironic? The program is hosted by one Billy BUSH. And yes, he is one of THOSE Bushes. Specifically the son of Jonathan Bush, the corrupt banker who helped Poppy (his brother) with the BCCI terrorist banking scam.

[Kristy]

Well, the picture says otherwise, George.

I have to admit that is interesting - if true.

[Kristy]

Here's irony for you...... just flipping through the channels on HellCable...

Don't you just call it "XFinity" like the rest of us?

[Kristy]

Jackie was quite fuckable for an Illuminati Blueblood

[Seshmeister]

I wonder what she found so attractive about billionaire Aristotle Onassis...

[Kristy]

I'm sure the word "billionaire" might have something to do with it.

[evilletwin]

Let me guess, Some Jesse Ventura/Alex Jone$ produced "documentary" upon which it's all linked back to Obama?

Jesus, not everything is a conspiracy in your land of the free and the brave. As a Brit, being impartial to Yank Politics, I think I have a reasonable amount of intelligence to discern what is (or at least looks) real. I'm no Obama fan, I think he's a joke -- but I'm certainly no GOP fan either, I think one is as bad as the other for America. Daddy Bush with puppet son ruined your economy with his pandering to the cor-po-rats, and Barrack is merely a Republican in a bad suit with ultra bad policies and race dividing ethics (Zimmerman was a classic, he on his high horse doing a Sharpton, getting a police captain fired for doing his job, while failing to mention that three brutal black on white murders happened that exact day. So, I think the documentary I saw, with previously unreleased footage, showing the SS guy putting a hole in JFK's head, as he was so hungover, fumbling to get a shot off at the Tower, he loosed a round into the guy's head. Accidents do happen. All involved were threatened to keep quiet over the incident or else. . . Now, did Oswald fire the 2nd bullet that hit JFK in the shoulder, that brought him flying back and his head getting in the way of a hungover agent who fired the kill shot? The documentary says yes, I seriously doubt it. They got the best sniper in the States to take the shot with the same gun LHO used, and he only made a direct hit on the third attempt. Unlikely Oswald was a shooter. Maybe, who knows. But if he worked for the CIA, KGB, or whoever would want JFK dead - they would hardly issue the guy with a weapon that basically a pop gun would have more accuracy. Did he act alone? No personal history showed he would do such a thing. That's all I was saying.

[Satan]

Except the Secret Service agent with the rifle was in the car behind Kennedy, and the kill shot was clearly fired from the front, with the part of JFK's skull that was blown off, being the obvious exit wound.

So the kill shot was not fired by either Oswald or a drunk/hungover SS guy. It was fired by a BCE/CIA assassin in the area which has commonly beome known as "the grassy knoll"

[Kristy]

Jesus, not everything is a conspiracy in your land of the free and the brave. As a Brit, being impartial to Yank Politics

One, fuck you you self-entitled whiny limey.

I think I have a reasonable amount of intelligence to discern what is (or at least looks) real. I'm no Obama fan, I think he's a joke -- but I'm certainly no GOP fan either, I think one is as bad as the other for America. Daddy Bush with puppet son ruined your economy with his pandering to the cor-po-rats, and Barrack is merely a Republican in a bad suit with ultra bad policies and race dividing ethics (Zimmerman was a classic, he on his high horse doing a Sharpton, getting a police captain fired for doing his job, while failing to mention that three brutal black on white murders happened that exact day.

Okay, sure, totally relevant to the Kennedy assassination no doubt. Some intelligence, indeed.

[

So, I think the documentary I saw, with previously unreleased footage, showing the SS guy putting a hole in JFK's head, as he was so hungover, fumbling to get a shot off at the Tower, he loosed a round into the guy's head. Accidents do happen. All involved were threatened to keep quiet over the incident or else. . . Now, did Oswald fire the 2nd bullet that hit JFK in the shoulder, that brought him flying back and his head getting in the way of a hungover agent who fired the kill shot? The documentary says yes, I seriously doubt it. They got the best sniper in the States to take the shot with the same gun LHO used, and he only made a direct hit on the third attempt. Unlikely Oswald was a shooter. Maybe, who knows. But if he worked for the CIA, KGB, or whoever would want JFK dead - they would hardly issue the guy with a weapon that basically a pop gun would have more accuracy. Did he act alone? No personal history showed he would do such a thing. That's all I was saying.

What you're saying contradicts your original statement

[Seshmeister]

Did he act alone? No personal history showed he would do such a thing. That's all I was saying.

There could hardly be more personal history - he was textbook lone nut shooter.

[Seshmeister]

I just listened to Oliver Stone give an interview about the 50th anniversary and he's saying the key bit of evidence, the one that is indisputable is that Kennedy was hit from two sides and that the Zebrudder film with his head going backwards towards Oswald categorically proves this.

Bizarre after all these years, I guess some people just get absorbed into these things and can't take a step back to look at any other evidence after a while.