Originally posted by Seshmeister
I just think it's amazing that over thousands of years people have spent so much time analysing every nuance of the text of the bible but so little has been done looking into where it came from.
There seems to be some pretty good evidence that Mary Magdelene was of royal blood so are we looking at spin...?
You have Constantine fearing the threat of an alternative heir so how better than to say she was a whore?
Unless Jesus was a screaming homosexual then it was deeply frowned upon for a 30 year old Jewish guy in those days not to be married. If he wasn't married then there should have been some justification for that in the gospels.
Leonardo da Vinci in his last supper painting shows a women(surely) at his right hand side.

Why would he risk that?
You have Constantine fearing the threat of an alternative heir so how better than to say she was a whore?
Cheers!
I just think it's amazing that over thousands of years people have spent so much time analysing every nuance of the text of the bible but so little has been done looking into where it came from.
There seems to be some pretty good evidence that Mary Magdelene was of royal blood so are we looking at spin...?
You have Constantine fearing the threat of an alternative heir so how better than to say she was a whore?
Unless Jesus was a screaming homosexual then it was deeply frowned upon for a 30 year old Jewish guy in those days not to be married. If he wasn't married then there should have been some justification for that in the gospels.
Leonardo da Vinci in his last supper painting shows a women(surely) at his right hand side.

Why would he risk that?
You have Constantine fearing the threat of an alternative heir so how better than to say she was a whore?
Cheers!

Comment