Originally posted by Cathedral
Ok then, by YOUR logic Saddam Hussein "technically" had WMD.
We sold the shit to him so we know for a fact he had them.
He used it on his own people so we know for a fact he had them.
So, "technically", Bush didn't lie either then.
Whats good for the goose is good for the gander, Ford.
But go ahead, let's here your spin on how one piece of shit is better than another piece of shit.
because when you break it down, if it looks and smells like shit it is shit...you don't have to taste it to know for sure.
Ok then, by YOUR logic Saddam Hussein "technically" had WMD.
We sold the shit to him so we know for a fact he had them.
He used it on his own people so we know for a fact he had them.
So, "technically", Bush didn't lie either then.
Whats good for the goose is good for the gander, Ford.
But go ahead, let's here your spin on how one piece of shit is better than another piece of shit.
because when you break it down, if it looks and smells like shit it is shit...you don't have to taste it to know for sure.
Chimp KNEW there were no WMD's in Iraq.
Not because Saddam refused to comment one way or another.
But because Scott Ritter, who led the previous UN inspection team, said so. And if Chimp wants to claim he can't trust the UN, he should at least trust the word of a US Marine Intelligence Officer
Because the sanctions and the restrictions of the north & south "No fly zones" had left Saddam effectively neutered as a threat to anyone outside the middle third of Iraq.
There was no reason to invade Iraq.
Except for the oil motivations of Bush/Cheney and the Isreali supremacy motivations of Likud/PNAC
And neither of those will EVER justify the loss of American lives, nor the slaughter of foreign civillians.
Comment