Gun Nut Afraid Obama Would Disarm Him, Kills 3 Cops

[bueno bob]

But Obama will try to take all firearms from the general public during his first term...

Mark my words, bitches...

I seriously doubt that. I could see him making an effort to make automatic weapons and assault weapons more difficult to obtain or keep, possibly, but frankly the only use for an Uzi or an AK47 (or otherwise) is to kill somebody, anyway. No practical application in hunting and they're essentially useless for home defense to anybody untrained in their usage.

Weapon collectors, of course, have a legitimate claim to them, but that's what background checks are done for. And frankly, I think background checks need to be more in depth and better executed. That system always needs an overhaul, no matter how good it currently is (or isn't).

I mean, unless we've all of a sudden developed problems with background checks and that's all part of a massive Democrat conspiracy to disarm the public, too....

[FORD]

There was a stand up comedian, I forget who now, who actually figured out the problem of gun violence.

Solution isn't taking away guns or making them more difficult to obtain - the solution was to keep it as is and just price bullets at $100.00 a pop.

You'd watch gun violence and accidental shootings vanish overnight, guaranteed.

It was Chris Rock.....

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eFcVwDw4YLE&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eFcVwDw4YLE&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[bueno bob]

It was Chris Rock.....

Ah yes, thank you.

[LoungeMachine]

But Obama will try to take all firearms from the general public during his first term...

Mark my words, bitches...

You're an idiot.

Mark my words...

[sadaist]

My guns are even registered, so I should be the first one to lose my guns.

Same here. Well, my shotguns are not registered, but they aren't required to be. If they change that law I'm not sure if I would register them. They can't take what they don't know you have.

[ELVIS]

Looks like Elvis has seen the new Alex Jones "movie".

Not yet...

[ELVIS]

No practical application in hunting and they're essentially useless for home defense to anybody untrained in their usage.

The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting...

[sadaist]

Weapon collectors, of course, have a legitimate claim to them

What makes a person a collector? Starting with one, enjoying it, then deciding you would like to own more.

[Nickdfresh]

Another CIA brainwashed plant set off to further Obama's agenda of disarming all of us...

You can pull Elvis' bed-pan out of his cold, dead hand!

[Nickdfresh]

But Obama will try to take all firearms from the general public during his first term...

Mark my words, bitches...

That's kind of funny, dope. Because I think he actually supported the Supreme Court decision overturning D.C.'s handgun ban...

[LoungeMachine]

The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting...

...and yet EVERYTHING to do with forming a well regulated militia

You gun nut clowns always forget that part when bringing up the 2nd amendment, why is that?

[Nickdfresh]

Looks like Elvis has seen the new Alex Jones "movie".

I watched that thing tonight. While I pretty much agree with everything he said about the Bilderbergers and the (not so) Federal Reserve, his case against Obama himself was pathetically weak. Allegations about him being "groomed for 30 years" (what, since he was 17??) without a shred of evidence to back it up.

You know you have problems when Ford calls you out as a conspiracist buffoon...

[Big Train]

I'm a conservative, but I am an independent conservative primarily for two reasons. I have no allegiance to guns or formalized religion (although I do believe in god and spirituality). If we did or didn't have guns, I don't really care. It's one of the "five subcultures that destroy men" that Carlin spoke about.

We have useful gun control and enough laws on the books. What we don't have and truly need is ammo control. These guys were able to do so much damage this week not because of the guns they carried, which are for the most part fairly standard issue, but the amount of ammo they carried, which allowed them to keep on firing. Nobody for ANY reason should have more than a box of ammo. If you need more than 1-2 boxes, your a shitty hunter. If the firing range kept ammo, fine. But you sign it out to fire it THERE and then. Like a driving range.

These are horrible events and my heart goes out to all involved. I just can't help but thing if these fucking useless pieces had less ammo, more would have survived and less would have been hurt.

[bueno bob]

What makes a person a collector? Starting with one, enjoying it, then deciding you would like to own more.

Or maybe a visible and defined investment at the onset would go a long way to establish intent and actualized desire? Examination of a storehouse where said weapons are to be stored and displayed? Perhaps a business license of some sort to trade or sell to further establish intent for the purchase/ownership of multiple assault rifles?

Or you can still have random guys who flip out, get pissed that they got fired, and decide they're going to shoot up their employers old place saying "Uh, yeah, I'm a collector! That's the ticket!"

I have multiple guns myself, and as a gun owner I have NO problem with intensified regulation of assault weaponry, period. As I stated, assault weaponry serves no purpose other than killing people and for that reason they should be EXTREMELY difficult to come by.

[bueno bob]

The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting...

I'm fully aware of it.

I get the feeling, however, that the founding fathers didn't visualize everybody in America running around with Heckler & Koch MG3's strapped to them either.