So to use your own argument, just ignore the real cause of these events, right? Let's not bother to find out the cause and try and prevent it, right?
I'll say it yet again: Anyone with such a desire to kill will find another way. The reason you don't hear about those events is partly because a gun if available is the first choice. No disagreement from me there. But there are lots of events everywhere in the world where mass killings occured with knives, other weapons, etc. As many people killed at once? Not usually, but sometimes.
And I did say I don't know why anyone needs an assault rifle.
But I'll bet if you take away guns, other killings will go up. People will have less defense against home invasions, for example. So who is to say more people won't be killed overall during other violent crimes if the general population is unarmed? You just won't here about it in the media.
I'll say it yet again: Anyone with such a desire to kill will find another way. The reason you don't hear about those events is partly because a gun if available is the first choice. No disagreement from me there. But there are lots of events everywhere in the world where mass killings occured with knives, other weapons, etc. As many people killed at once? Not usually, but sometimes.
And I did say I don't know why anyone needs an assault rifle.
But I'll bet if you take away guns, other killings will go up. People will have less defense against home invasions, for example. So who is to say more people won't be killed overall during other violent crimes if the general population is unarmed? You just won't here about it in the media.
Comment